Sarah Dye and Douglas Mackey are fantastic people, who’ve been unjustly persecuted for having the “wrong” opinions.

They’ve remained strong in the face of an unrelenting left-wing witch hunt, and for that they deserve to be commended.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pqdaGKS3V68

Please consider supporting Sarah and Doug. Their farm flooded the week all of this went down, which has made the past few months even more trying.

https://schoonercreekfarm.org/donate

Chicago friends: I’ll be in your area next week. Reach out if you want to get together.

you either die a certain age, or live long enough to see yourself become older than that age

Bring on the obnoxious superchats

Greetings from the promised land

I finished The Sopranos tonight. Excellent show. The ending was good—ambiguous, but good. The final scene—where the Sopranos are eating in the diner—was delightfully anxious. It leaves you on the edge of your seat, awaiting some tragedy to befall the family—but then it ends abruptly.

Ending a show is hard. I’m not without sympathy for the writers of any popular show. They must be aware of the fact that people are going to whine, regardless of how well an ending is written and executed. Most of the largest shows—Lost, Breaking Bad, Dexter, etc.—have managed to piss people off.

The Sopranos is of particular interest to us as identitarians. Race, ethnicity, and religion are all explored within an American context. Tony’s “old-fashioned” views on race are presented without progressive moralizing.

Further interesting is the way in which the show approaches degeneracy. These days, interracial relationships, homosexuality, drugs, promiscuity, etc. are flaunted as virtues in mass media; in The Sopranos, they’re portrayed as destructive and unwholesome. Vito’s escapades end tragically; Tony’s womanizing causes immense damage to his family life; multiple characters destroy themselves via substance abuse; and despite having considerable worldly riches, Tony and many other characters are profoundly unhappy.

The villain is a notorious washed up e-celeb who’s livestreaming the event on YouTube and raking in millions in superchats

Today we're launching our Autumn Fundraiser!

We have big plans for the upcoming months, including a few actions centered around the 2020 election – actions with the potential to force identitarianism into the public spotlight.

Contributions can be made out to American Identity Movement and sent to PO Box 2702 Leesburg, VA 20177.

Additionally, you can help by donating crypto:

BTC: 1PYcVEnJPG42XYEhhMiwa4KLPkoWYjVmtG

Thank you!

Going live right now! Dlive.tv/nickjfuentes

The Saudi oil field thing is certainly cause for concern, but let’s remember that the safest bet is always that nothing will happen.

We’ve seen plenty of saber-rattling in this past. While this particular incident is serious, I’d be surprised if we see military action.

Damn.

To be fair, it’s not as if they’re going to outright ban the classics anytime soon.

But they don’t need to; for to consign Western literature to the figurative and literal dumpster of history only requires that new generations be left uneducated on such things.

This is happening right before our eyes. Go out onto the street and ask people if they’ve even heard of Melville, Dostoevsky, Spengler, Nietzsche, Kant, etc.—most haven’t. Even among otherwise educated people, knowledge our people’s intellectual and cultural achievements is waning.

As such, it isn’t too far fetched to imagine that a few generations from now the average White American will be totally unaware of the depth and profundity that existed in the before times. Sure, the books will still be there—at least online—but no one will know about them, let alone read them. For such works are ultimately the products of a time before “progress” finally took root, and thus to be treated as volatile artifacts.