Globalists, liberals, and leftists consider any right-wing political expression “white supremacy.”

There’s no codified definition of the term; even if there were, it would encompass far more than violent extremism.

Look at the replies to Scott’s tweet—they’re filled with naive conservatives, who believe that they’ll be excluded from the criminalization of “white supremacy.”

Case in point:

Be sure to add me on Snapchat for more garbage content: thepatrickcasey

So apparently the El Paso shooter didn’t even post his manifesto to 8chan—someone else did. The shooter posted it to Instagram.

Nevertheless, 8chan is being punished for allowing people to express dissident views. As its owner notes, the site does take action against illegal content.

If nothing changes, we face a future in which something as benign as “it’s okay to be white” qualifies as hate speech; such expression could very well be criminalized in our lifetimes.

To reiterate: The establishment’s goal is to convince people that white identity = violence. Radicals have been pushing this for a while, arguing that some speech—e.g., calling for immigration restriction—is inherently violent, and thus should not be protected by the 1A.

That’s obviously not true, but unfortunately is what the ruling class is working towards.

Big-brained traditionalism = throwing open your borders to third world peasants

Epic if true