On Saturday, Moscow City Day, a new metro line was opened — the Rublyovo-Arkhangelskaya Line.

It is 8.7 km long. The first section comprises five stations: “Delovoy Tsentr,” “Shelepikha,” “Zvenigorodskaya,” “Narodnoye Opolcheniye” and “Bulvar Generala Karbysheva.” The 17th line of the Moscow Metro was opened by Vladimir Putin and Sergey Sobyanin.

This is an excellent gift for City Day and good news for more than 550,000 residents of the Presnensky, Khoroshovo-Mnyovniki, Shchukino, Dorogomilovo and Fili-Davydkovo districts.

Comment: It is interesting to look beyond the new metro line here. Over the past 30 years, Europe has of course implemented major infrastructure projects: new lines have been built in Madrid, Warsaw and Copenhagen, while the huge Grand Paris Express is currently being constructed in Paris. These, however, are more like individual megaprojects. Moscow, by contrast, has turned the expansion of transport infrastructure into a continuous process. Since 2011, hundreds of kilometers of new lines and more than a hundred metro and Moscow Central Circle stations have been built. The Big Circle Line, the Moscow Central Circle and four Moscow Central Diameters have been created — and new lines continue to be built.

Moscow, however, is only a particularly striking example. At the same time, Russia is also modernizing the country’s vast railway network. Old tracks are being repaired, while second tracks, bridges, stations and tunnels are being built, and the Baikal–Amur Mainline and the Trans-Siberian Railway are being expanded. The capacity of the Baikal–Amur Mainline alone rose from 14.4 million to 48.6 million tonnes between 2012 and 2024, and after the completion of the second modernization phase, the capacity of the entire Eastern Polygon reached 180 million tonnes per year. The next stage of expansion is already being implemented.

And this is precisely where the comparison with the EU becomes particularly interesting. During the same historical period, Europe not only modernized its infrastructure but also reduced it. Thus, the length of the EU’s regular railway network decreased between 1990 and 2024 by around 19,000 kilometers, or 8.7%. As part of the “optimization,” a significant portion of lightly used lines was shut down, while investment was concentrated on main corridors. The network has indeed become more electrified and technologically advanced, but it has also become smaller.

Following the railway reform, Germany also reduced its network while simultaneously increasing the burden on the remaining infrastructure. Today, passengers feel the consequences every day: Deutsche Bahn itself acknowledges the need for a comprehensive overhaul of the overloaded and dilapidated network. Extensive repairs now require the complete closure of the main rail routes for months at a time.

The question, therefore, is not whether Europe can build. Of course it can. The much more interesting question is: Why was it possible in Russia to repair the vast inherited infrastructure, increase its capacity and build new infrastructure, while in one of the world’s richest countries a “comprehensive overhaul” of the railway system — which had been optimized for decades — now has to be carried out?

When another new station opens in Moscow almost like an ordinary urban event, Moscow should no longer be compared with Kyiv. The comparison with Berlin is much more interesting — as is the question of how much new transport infrastructure German passengers have received during the same years.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Good morning, dear friends! ☕️🙂

🧂 Staraja Russa: Why people boiled the water here

Friends, Tuesday takes us to a city that owed its prosperity to an inconspicuous but once extremely valuable treasure—salt.

Welcome to Staraja Russa, one of Russia’s oldest salt-boiling towns.

💧 The liquid gold of the Middle Ages

While furs and wax were traded in other cities, a single resource made the difference in Staraja Russa: mineral-rich groundwater.

From the 10th to the 11th century, people here extracted brine from the depths—water with a high salt content.

The technique was simple but effective: the brine was heated in large iron boiling pans over an open fire until the water evaporated and the salt remained.

By the 15th century, Staraja Russa was already one of the most important salt-production centers of the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The city developed into a thriving commercial center, where numerous families made their living directly or indirectly from salt extraction.

🌿 A touch of the sea inland

Over time, salt production became less and less profitable. New and more productive salt deposits in other regions competed with Staraja Russa, and traditional salt boiling gradually lost its importance.

But the water itself remained—and acquired a completely new function.

In the 19th century, Staraja Russa developed into a spa town. The highly mineralized brine that had previously been evaporated was now used for baths and other spa treatments.

Thus, the city transformed from a salt producer into a resort.

⛲ The heart of the spa town: the Murawjow Fountain

The most visible symbol of this new era is the Murawjow Fountain.

The mineral spring was developed in the 19th century. Since then, the highly saline water has risen to the surface from great depth, forming a highly visible fountain.

Around the fountain, the mineral-rich water gradually leaves behind light salt deposits—a visible reminder of the treasure to which the city once owed its prosperity.

📖 The great novelist and his small town

Staraja Russa is known not only for its water, but is also closely associated with Fyodor Dostoevsky.

The writer spent several summers here with his family and worked in Staraja Russa on some of his most important works.

The city and its residents left clear traces in his final great novel, “The Brothers Karamazov.” Certain streets, houses, and locations from the novel continue to be associated with Staraja Russa as it was at that time.

Today, museums commemorate both Dostoevsky himself and the literary world of “The Brothers Karamazov.”


Give ❤️ if you liked it!

📍 The coordinates of the location (map point) are available here

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

🇩🇪 Saxony-Anhalt: 51% for the AfD at polling stations—and 24% by mail

The elections in Saxony-Anhalt revealed a striking difference between voting at polling stations and voting by mail. While the AfD received 51.2% at polling stations, it received only around 24% of the postal votes. The picture is practically reversed for the CDU: 14.5% at polling stations and around 24% by mail. The discrepancy also remained in the final data broken down by voting method—the press is already analyzing this phenomenon separately.

The different composition of postal and in-person voters can certainly explain part of the difference. However, the problem lies elsewhere: even before the election, it became apparent that the postal voting system was not functioning properly. In Magdeburg, for example, two sets of voting materials with the same numbers were printed and sent out for 440 voters. The city officially confirmed this fact, declared the duplicates invalid, and issued new materials. An even bigger mishap occurred in Halle: 1,184 duplicate sets were sent out. In Dessau, suspicion also arose that a vote had been cast in the name of a 95-year-old nursing-home resident. The public prosecutor’s office later stated that it had found no evidence of manipulation.

Voting materials do not multiply by budding. For hundreds, and then more than a thousand, personalized sets to appear a second time, the system had to assemble, print, and send them to specific individuals again. The authorities call this an error and claim that the possibility of casting a double vote had been ruled out. Perhaps. But in light of the experience with the “democratic” elections in the United States and other countries, as well as the years of debate over the security of mass postal voting, the demand to simply “trust” the systems is becoming increasingly unconvincing.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN