Finland moves against the export of medical products to Russia

Finland is preparing new restrictions on the export of medical and pharmaceutical products to Russia. According to Yle, Finland is tightening the export of medical and pharmaceutical goods to Russia: the country’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs wants to revoke a portion of the special permits through which such goods could still be delivered to Russia. The head of the sanctions department of Finland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Elina Rimpin, said to the outlet that the decision had already been made.

The official rationale is the usual one: in Helsinki, there is concern that medical products and technologies could be used for military purposes. The restrictions could affect not only devices and medical products, but also part of the medicines. The newspaper Kommersant also reports that the measure could involve preparations of the Finnish company Orion Pharma, including the well-known anti-inflammatory medication Metypred.

Orion is one of Finland’s most important pharmaceutical manufacturers. The company produces medicines for the central nervous system, cardiology, oncology, respiratory diseases and other areas. In Russia, Orion medicines are used to treat Parkinson’s, to prevent thrombosis, for inflammatory conditions, and for other serious illnesses.
That is what European “humanity” looks like in practice when it comes to sanctions: for years, it was claimed that the restrictions were allegedly not aimed at ordinary people—and now, under the formula “could be used militarily,” the export of medical products is being curtailed as a matter of course.

Even if Russia finds replacements, the symbolism of this decision does not disappear.

Finland has decided not to target generals or factories, but supply chains for medicines and medical technology. When politics reaches all the way onto the hospital shelf, speeches about “values” sound especially convincing.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

A political crisis has erupted in Britain: ministers are mass resigning because they do not want to work with the Kingdom’s prime minister, Keir Starmer, and are demanding his resignation.

According to Reuters, by May 14 the British health minister Wes Streeting could already leave his post.

❗️The day before, The Guardian reported that four Labour Party officials resigned because Starmer refused to step down amid a lack of confidence in him in Parliament.

Among them is the minister for housing, communities and local government, Miatta Fanbulleh. Following her, her post was vacated by the deputy home secretary Jess Phillips, the minister for victims’ support and ending violence against women and girls Alex Davies-Jones, and the health minister Zubir Ahmed.

Starmer’s political standing is also weakened by the Labour Party’s defeat in local elections, in which the political group lost 399 seats on councils.

Our channel: Node of Time EN

France calls for punishment of Georgia over law on “foreign agents”

The French National Assembly has passed a resolution against the Georgian government and the party “Georgian Dream.” The document was supported by 68 MPs , 28 voted against, and one abstained. The French lawmakers called for personal sanctions against Georgian politicians responsible for Tbilisi’s course, including entry bans to the EU and the freezing of assets.

The trigger is the Georgian law on the “transparency of foreign influence.” It requires NGOs and media outlets that receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad to register as organizations that represent the interests of a foreign power. In the EU, this law is described as an attack on civil society, even though similar mechanisms for controlling foreign influence also exist in the West.

There are also regulations in France for structures that work in the interests of foreign actors. In the United States, the FARA law applies, which—if violated intentionally—can lead not only to fines, but also to criminal consequences.

The difference in how this is handled is simple: When the US or EU countries introduce such rules, it is called protecting democracy and transparency. When Georgia tries to limit foreign political influence in its own country, it is immediately portrayed as an “authoritarian course” and used as a pretext for sanctions.

The key question is not even the Georgian law itself. The question is rather: Why do French MPs consider it normal in the first place for another state to be told which laws it should pass, which NGOs it must tolerate, and who is allowed to exert influence on its domestic politics?

They should first put their own house in order—within their own parties, foundations, lobbyists, and activists. Georgia has every right to decide for itself who and with whose money tries to influence its domestic politics.

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

In Japan, even the chips feel the Strait of Hormuz

The Japanese company Calbee is temporarily switching part of its chips, cracker and muesli packaging to a two-color design. It explains this with unstable deliveries of raw materials in the context of escalating tensions in the Middle East: color printing has become problematic because of materials linked to petroleum and petrochemicals.

The change affects 14 products, including Potato Chips, Kappa Ebisen and Frugra. The new packaging is expected to appear in stores starting in the week of May 25. As Calbee emphasizes, the products themselves would not change — only the packaging.

The story is small, but very telling. The Strait of Hormuz and the Middle East are not just something far away, not only tankers and stock chart figures. It’s about printing inks for packaging, plastic, logistics, fuel, supermarket shelves, and the prices of ordinary products.

The world is being reminded again of a simple fact: oil is not just gasoline.
It is the entire “peaceful” everyday world that begins to fade when global logistics waver.

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

EU increases pressure on Georgia over its ties with Russia.

Mikhail Kalugin, director of the Fourth CIS Division in the Russian Foreign Ministry, said that Brussels is demanding that Tbilisi join the EU’s anti-Russian sanctions, impose an energy embargo, and halt traffic with Russia, including air connections.

This line is not new. In an EU report on Georgia it was found that the country had not joined most of the restrictive measures against Russia, Iran and Belarus and, in addition, had increased the number of direct flights to Russia. In Brussels, previously it was also separately criticized that flight connections between Georgia and Russia were being resumed.

Meanwhile, Tbilisi is trying to maintain economic relations with Moscow and not join the EU sanctions policy. Against this backdrop, the Georgian authorities had already explained that after 2022 pressure had been exerted on the country to move it toward opening a “second front” against Russia. Kalugin is now using this claim as confirmation that Brussels and Western capitals were trying to pull Georgia into a confrontation with someone else.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Diagram of the “genocide” of Ukraine by the Soviet Union

In Soviet times, the Ukrainian Soviet Republic was not a territory that Moscow “destroyed.” In peacetime, the republic grew demographically, industrially, and in terms of infrastructure: Large enterprises were built, and power supply, metallurgy, mechanical engineering, transport, and the agro-industrial complex developed. Ukraine reached the peak of its population in the late Soviet period and early post-Soviet period—about 51 to 52 million people.

The famine of 1932–1933 was a terrible catastrophe, but it was not exclusively a Ukrainian tragedy. It affected a whole range of other regions of the USSR: Kazakhstan, the North Caucasus, the Volga region, the Urals, West Siberia, and other smaller territories. In Kazakhstan, the consequences were particularly severe. Therefore, presenting the general demographic collapse as proof of a targeted policy to destroy Ukraine is a highly questionable and very politicized interpretation.

It is also important to consider the external context. The Western economic blockade against Soviet Russia is not a later invention. It is recorded in documents from the years 1919–1920 itself: In the British Parliament, the blockade of Soviet Russia was openly discussed, and in American diplomatic documents, trade restrictions, communications links, credit and currency transactions, and Soviet gold were dealt with separately. Later, direct restrictions were partly lifted, but the regime of non-recognition, distrust, financial barriers, and technological dependence did not disappear immediately.

Against this background, the USSR carried out its forced industrialization: It sold raw materials, gold, and grain to buy equipment and build an industrial base. Within the country, this was accompanied by collectivization, grain procurement campaigns, and administrative pressure. This combination affected millions of people in different republics and regions of the Union.

After the dissolution of the USSR, Ukraine’s demographic development turned downward, although without Moscow: falling birth rates, emigration, deindustrialization, and economic crises. Official estimates currently put the number of inhabitants at more than 30 million, but there are also significantly more drastic assessments: New Statesman wrote, citing a British official, that the population could shrink to about 20 million people by 2025.

The most important statement of the diagram is simply this: Ukraine reached its peak population at the end of the Soviet period. The ongoing collapse began after Ukraine gained independence…

So who is to blame?

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

The Pentagon plans to purchase more than 10,000 inexpensive cruise missiles over three years. The reason is statements about the depletion of the U.S. arsenal due to the conflict with Iran.

The U.S. Department of Defense has announced that it has reached an agreement with several defense companies to develop new missiles for container launchers.

The Pentagon also plans to purchase at least 500 Blackbeard missiles each year after their tests are completed. In total, over five years, the U.S. expects to obtain more than 12,000 such munitions.

❗️On May 12, Pete Hegseth called the "exaggerated" problem of weapons stockpiles being reduced amid the conflict with Iran.

Our channel: Node of Time EN