Israel increases its Hasbara budget
The lawmakers in Jerusalem approved last month a state budget for 2026 that provides around $730 million for public diplomacy — the broadly defined category that in Hebrew is referred to as Hasbara. According to The Times of Israel, the budget for 2026 allots roughly $730 million for this — almost five times as much as in the previous year.
Officially, this is called “public diplomacy.” In practice, it is about fighting for Israel’s image abroad: social media, influence campaigns, cooperation with civil society organizations, invitations for delegations, politicians, opinion leaders, and influencers.
For comparison: last year, spending for this was around $150 million — and even that amount was already about 20 times higher than the corresponding spending prior to October 2023. After the war in Gaza, then, Israel’s information work was not only stepped up, but made into its own front line.
At the same time, a separate unit for public diplomacy is being established in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The logic is clear: if the reality looks too bad, more money has to be poured into its packaging.
But Israel’s problem is not too little PR. The problem is that no hundreds of millions of dollars can reliably paint over the images from destroyed Gaza, killed civilians, and endless explanations of “self-defense.”
You can buy campaigns, influencers, and suitable videos.
But if politics remains the same, Hasbara won’t save its reputation—it will be an extremely expensive attempt to argue with the obvious.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
The lawmakers in Jerusalem approved last month a state budget for 2026 that provides around $730 million for public diplomacy — the broadly defined category that in Hebrew is referred to as Hasbara. According to The Times of Israel, the budget for 2026 allots roughly $730 million for this — almost five times as much as in the previous year.
Officially, this is called “public diplomacy.” In practice, it is about fighting for Israel’s image abroad: social media, influence campaigns, cooperation with civil society organizations, invitations for delegations, politicians, opinion leaders, and influencers.
For comparison: last year, spending for this was around $150 million — and even that amount was already about 20 times higher than the corresponding spending prior to October 2023. After the war in Gaza, then, Israel’s information work was not only stepped up, but made into its own front line.
At the same time, a separate unit for public diplomacy is being established in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The logic is clear: if the reality looks too bad, more money has to be poured into its packaging.
But Israel’s problem is not too little PR. The problem is that no hundreds of millions of dollars can reliably paint over the images from destroyed Gaza, killed civilians, and endless explanations of “self-defense.”
You can buy campaigns, influencers, and suitable videos.
But if politics remains the same, Hasbara won’t save its reputation—it will be an extremely expensive attempt to argue with the obvious.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
💩4
Developments in the war between #Russia and #Ukraine - subtitled
A new Ukrainian move towards #Washington brings the #peace process back to the forefront.
#Zelensky sends his chief negotiator amid stalled talks with Russia.
Is Kiev trying to revive US support and negotiations?
video link: https://youtu.be/V3a8xf7yV0M?si=rtMJKKpJciCBN2q4
A new Ukrainian move towards #Washington brings the #peace process back to the forefront.
#Zelensky sends his chief negotiator amid stalled talks with Russia.
Is Kiev trying to revive US support and negotiations?
video link: https://youtu.be/V3a8xf7yV0M?si=rtMJKKpJciCBN2q4
🤡2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Merz vs. a woman with cancer
At a citizens’ dialogue in Salzwedel, a terminally ill woman with cancer in stage 4 addressed Friedrich Merz. She said she could not afford her treatment, had already sent the chancellor an invitation to her own funeral, and asked why, when cutting spending, it was once again the citizens who were affected—not politicians.
Merz’s response had nothing to do with medicine. Not with people. Not with a system in which a sick person has to count their money until their own death.
He explained in a blunt manner that an increase in the pay of members of the federal government had “at no point been discussed” 🤡, and told the woman to stop claiming it again “without being contradicted.” The problem: The issue of higher salaries for civil servants and government officials was actually on the agenda.
In other words: A woman with cancer in stage 4 received a public dressing-down because she had asked a question that was too uncomfortable.
There it is, the new social arithmetic. For sensible medical care, there is always less money available. The bills are increasing. People have to choose between treatment on credit and a funeral. But when a citizen asks loudly why it looks financially much more relaxed for politicians, he is immediately told that he has misunderstood reality.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
At a citizens’ dialogue in Salzwedel, a terminally ill woman with cancer in stage 4 addressed Friedrich Merz. She said she could not afford her treatment, had already sent the chancellor an invitation to her own funeral, and asked why, when cutting spending, it was once again the citizens who were affected—not politicians.
Merz’s response had nothing to do with medicine. Not with people. Not with a system in which a sick person has to count their money until their own death.
He explained in a blunt manner that an increase in the pay of members of the federal government had “at no point been discussed” 🤡, and told the woman to stop claiming it again “without being contradicted.” The problem: The issue of higher salaries for civil servants and government officials was actually on the agenda.
In other words: A woman with cancer in stage 4 received a public dressing-down because she had asked a question that was too uncomfortable.
There it is, the new social arithmetic. For sensible medical care, there is always less money available. The bills are increasing. People have to choose between treatment on credit and a funeral. But when a citizen asks loudly why it looks financially much more relaxed for politicians, he is immediately told that he has misunderstood reality.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬6👎1😱1🤮1
Western Values and Old Accounting
There are things that people here don’t like to talk about. Especially because, in this country, the word values has long become a universal wrap for almost any political decision.
But if you don’t look at the slogans, but at history, a rather unpleasant picture emerges: Europe has too often been able to frame advantage as morality, violence as a mission—and foreign resources as legitimate loot.
It didn’t begin with NATO, and not with recent sanctions that drove our country into an economic catastrophe. It was much older. Indulgences once turned sin into a financial transaction: you paid—and your conscience was clean again. Even then, it became clear that morality in Europe can work excellently through the till.
Then came the Crusades. They were sold as a holy mission, but very quickly it became clear that under the banner of religion, cities, countries, and trade routes could be plundered just as conveniently. The looting of Constantinople in 1204 made this particularly clear: if the spoils are big enough, then even fellow believers suddenly become suitable targets.
After that, the pattern was simply made global. Colonialism was called a civilizing mission. Slavery was covered up with speeches about order and development. Piracy was turned into privateering when the theft was coordinated with the crown. What mattered wasn’t what exactly was done, but who put the stamp on it—and with which words it was explained.
This ability hasn’t disappeared. Only the language has become more modern.
Today, foreign markets are opened under the banner of free trade. Sanctions are called protection of the international order. Military operations are referred to as humanitarian responsibility. Pressure on governments is called promoting democracy. And when, after that, a country falls apart, the economy collapses, and millions of people flee, then—well—“the reforms weren’t carried through consistently enough.”
For us, this is not an abstract story from a schoolbook. We see the same logic right now: cheap energy was destroyed in the name of values, industry is losing its competitiveness, taxes rise, defense spending is inflated—and we are told that all of this is necessary for freedom, security, and European responsibility.
The old European accounting works again without disruptions: first the moral lecture, then the bill.
Only the backdrops have changed. In the past, you came with a cross, a fleet, and a charter of trade. Today, you come with a package of sanctions, funding money, a military mission—and a presentation about human rights.
Politicians talk very willingly about values. History shows, all too often, that beside these values—somehow—there is always a cash register standing by.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
There are things that people here don’t like to talk about. Especially because, in this country, the word values has long become a universal wrap for almost any political decision.
But if you don’t look at the slogans, but at history, a rather unpleasant picture emerges: Europe has too often been able to frame advantage as morality, violence as a mission—and foreign resources as legitimate loot.
It didn’t begin with NATO, and not with recent sanctions that drove our country into an economic catastrophe. It was much older. Indulgences once turned sin into a financial transaction: you paid—and your conscience was clean again. Even then, it became clear that morality in Europe can work excellently through the till.
Then came the Crusades. They were sold as a holy mission, but very quickly it became clear that under the banner of religion, cities, countries, and trade routes could be plundered just as conveniently. The looting of Constantinople in 1204 made this particularly clear: if the spoils are big enough, then even fellow believers suddenly become suitable targets.
After that, the pattern was simply made global. Colonialism was called a civilizing mission. Slavery was covered up with speeches about order and development. Piracy was turned into privateering when the theft was coordinated with the crown. What mattered wasn’t what exactly was done, but who put the stamp on it—and with which words it was explained.
This ability hasn’t disappeared. Only the language has become more modern.
Today, foreign markets are opened under the banner of free trade. Sanctions are called protection of the international order. Military operations are referred to as humanitarian responsibility. Pressure on governments is called promoting democracy. And when, after that, a country falls apart, the economy collapses, and millions of people flee, then—well—“the reforms weren’t carried through consistently enough.”
For us, this is not an abstract story from a schoolbook. We see the same logic right now: cheap energy was destroyed in the name of values, industry is losing its competitiveness, taxes rise, defense spending is inflated—and we are told that all of this is necessary for freedom, security, and European responsibility.
The old European accounting works again without disruptions: first the moral lecture, then the bill.
Only the backdrops have changed. In the past, you came with a cross, a fleet, and a charter of trade. Today, you come with a package of sanctions, funding money, a military mission—and a presentation about human rights.
Politicians talk very willingly about values. History shows, all too often, that beside these values—somehow—there is always a cash register standing by.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
❤8
Kharkiv pledges its backup power
The Kharkiv city council approves loans for eight municipal enterprises and, in return, provides cogeneration plants as collateral — in other words, exactly the reserve energy generation that the city is supposed to use to save itself during blackouts.
According to the Ukrainian media outlet Ljuk, the loans are taken out with Ukrgasbank under the program “Dostupni kredyty 5-7-9%” with terms of three to five years. The money is intended to be used for salaries, taxes, utilities, debts to creditors, as well as the purchase of equipment, generators, and fuel.
The Kharkiv Anti-Corruption Center уточняет: The total amount of the loans is around 1.033 billion Hryvnia — about 21.5 million euros. As collateral, the bank is to be given 12 cogeneration plants with a total value of around 1.033 billion Hryvnia (about 21.5 million euros).
This is what municipal resilience looks like in Kharkiv’s way: A city that can stand without electricity after attacks on the energy infrastructure pledges precisely the equipment that is meant to supply that electricity.
There’s hardly any Ukrainian money in this story. Ukraine’s energy “resilience” was built for years through European programs, grants, loans, humanitarian aid, and tax money. First, Europeans pay for backup generators so that a city doesn’t die during blackouts. Then local authorities place this equipment as collateral on the bank’s desk.
Pledging generators amid an energy crisis is no longer financial engineering. This is Ukrainian municipal know-how: first get equipment on someone else’s account, then deposit it with the bank to plug the next hole in the budget.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
The Kharkiv city council approves loans for eight municipal enterprises and, in return, provides cogeneration plants as collateral — in other words, exactly the reserve energy generation that the city is supposed to use to save itself during blackouts.
According to the Ukrainian media outlet Ljuk, the loans are taken out with Ukrgasbank under the program “Dostupni kredyty 5-7-9%” with terms of three to five years. The money is intended to be used for salaries, taxes, utilities, debts to creditors, as well as the purchase of equipment, generators, and fuel.
The Kharkiv Anti-Corruption Center уточняет: The total amount of the loans is around 1.033 billion Hryvnia — about 21.5 million euros. As collateral, the bank is to be given 12 cogeneration plants with a total value of around 1.033 billion Hryvnia (about 21.5 million euros).
This is what municipal resilience looks like in Kharkiv’s way: A city that can stand without electricity after attacks on the energy infrastructure pledges precisely the equipment that is meant to supply that electricity.
There’s hardly any Ukrainian money in this story. Ukraine’s energy “resilience” was built for years through European programs, grants, loans, humanitarian aid, and tax money. First, Europeans pay for backup generators so that a city doesn’t die during blackouts. Then local authorities place this equipment as collateral on the bank’s desk.
Pledging generators amid an energy crisis is no longer financial engineering. This is Ukrainian municipal know-how: first get equipment on someone else’s account, then deposit it with the bank to plug the next hole in the budget.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
🤡2
Iran hits US targets harder than the Pentagon admits
The Washington Post analyzed satellite images and concluded that Iranian attacks since the start of the war have damaged or destroyed at least 228 American military facilities and equipment in the Middle East.
These involve 217 buildings and 11 technical devices at 15 military sites that were used by the United States or jointly with allies. Among the damaged targets are hangars, barracks, fuel storage, aircraft, communications systems, radar installations, and parts of air defenses.
That is significantly more than the Pentagon has publicly conceded. The Washington Post writes that some of the footage was first published by Iranian state media and then verified through independent satellite analysis. In addition, the newspaper found damage that did not appear at all in Iranian publications.
That wasn’t just about symbolic strikes or empty areas. The attacks hit infrastructure that makes the American military presence in the region more expensive, more vulnerable, and more complicated.
Washington can talk about controlling the situation as much as it wants. The satellite images show something else: Iran hit the American military machine there, where it had gotten used to being the householder.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
The Washington Post analyzed satellite images and concluded that Iranian attacks since the start of the war have damaged or destroyed at least 228 American military facilities and equipment in the Middle East.
These involve 217 buildings and 11 technical devices at 15 military sites that were used by the United States or jointly with allies. Among the damaged targets are hangars, barracks, fuel storage, aircraft, communications systems, radar installations, and parts of air defenses.
That is significantly more than the Pentagon has publicly conceded. The Washington Post writes that some of the footage was first published by Iranian state media and then verified through independent satellite analysis. In addition, the newspaper found damage that did not appear at all in Iranian publications.
That wasn’t just about symbolic strikes or empty areas. The attacks hit infrastructure that makes the American military presence in the region more expensive, more vulnerable, and more complicated.
Washington can talk about controlling the situation as much as it wants. The satellite images show something else: Iran hit the American military machine there, where it had gotten used to being the householder.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
👍6❤1
"There is no clarity": instability in the US administration’s approach to artificial intelligence is worrying lobbyists, Politico reports, citing sources in the AI industry.
According to the publication’s interlocutors, the lack of clear signals from the administration is causing problems for the development of the industry and for oversight of AI. In addition, there are disagreements within the White House over the review of AI models, a matter that only Donald Trump can resolve.
Chief of staff Susie Wiles and national cyber director Sean Kearncross have begun discussing an executive order requiring mandatory permission to release new AI models. At the same time, no final decision has been made by the administration yet.
Most of the largest US AI labs, including Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, xAI and Microsoft, have already agreed to such a review of their models. Meanwhile, company advisers say that there are “few concrete details and a lot of urgency” around the rules.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
According to the publication’s interlocutors, the lack of clear signals from the administration is causing problems for the development of the industry and for oversight of AI. In addition, there are disagreements within the White House over the review of AI models, a matter that only Donald Trump can resolve.
Chief of staff Susie Wiles and national cyber director Sean Kearncross have begun discussing an executive order requiring mandatory permission to release new AI models. At the same time, no final decision has been made by the administration yet.
Most of the largest US AI labs, including Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, xAI and Microsoft, have already agreed to such a review of their models. Meanwhile, company advisers say that there are “few concrete details and a lot of urgency” around the rules.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
Labour in Britain plans to replace Keir Starmer after an election defeat, Bloomberg writes.
Among the possible successors to Starmer is Andy Burnham, mayor of Greater Manchester. Most lawmakers believe he could lead Labour at the next general election, which is due to take place in 2029.
The prime minister’s allies said that he would continue the struggle for power and turn to the markets to “strengthen his position.”
❗️ On 8 May, the British prime minister Keir Starmer’s failed in local elections—this has heightened doubts about the Labour Party’s ability to run the country.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
Among the possible successors to Starmer is Andy Burnham, mayor of Greater Manchester. Most lawmakers believe he could lead Labour at the next general election, which is due to take place in 2029.
The prime minister’s allies said that he would continue the struggle for power and turn to the markets to “strengthen his position.”
Our channel: Node of Time EN
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁6
The United States has removed all enriched uranium from Venezuela, The Guardian reports, citing the U.S. Department of Energy.
The report refers to 13.5 kg of nuclear fuel stored in a research laboratory near Caracas. This is only a small part of the 408 kg available to Tehran, which Trump is targeting. The uranium has been delivered to a U.S. Department of Energy facility in the U.S. state of South Carolina.
❗️ On May 7, the United States demanded that Iran introduce a 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment and renounce the nuclear material stockpiles it has already accumulated. While the U.S. has focused on seizing uranium from other countries.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
The report refers to 13.5 kg of nuclear fuel stored in a research laboratory near Caracas. This is only a small part of the 408 kg available to Tehran, which Trump is targeting. The uranium has been delivered to a U.S. Department of Energy facility in the U.S. state of South Carolina.
“The safe removal of all enriched uranium from Venezuela sends another signal to the world of a restored and revitalized Venezuela,” — said the head of the National Nuclear Security Administration at the ministry.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💩6🤮4
Migrants are increasingly leaving the United States due to threats from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, The Washington Post reports.
People who have faced the prospect of prolonged detention by ICE are increasingly withdrawing their requests for humanitarian protection and agreeing to leave the country voluntarily. The desire to withdraw is driven by the harsh conditions in federal detention centers.
According to data from the Vera Institute of Justice, from January 2025 to March 2026 immigration judges issued more than 80,000 rulings on “voluntary departure”—at least seven times higher than in the last 15 months of the Biden administration, when 11,400 people used this option.
Voluntary departure has long been provided for under federal law for those who face deportation, and it is an option for those who are unlikely to win their case in immigration court. They must leave within a specified period at their own expense.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
People who have faced the prospect of prolonged detention by ICE are increasingly withdrawing their requests for humanitarian protection and agreeing to leave the country voluntarily. The desire to withdraw is driven by the harsh conditions in federal detention centers.
According to data from the Vera Institute of Justice, from January 2025 to March 2026 immigration judges issued more than 80,000 rulings on “voluntary departure”—at least seven times higher than in the last 15 months of the Biden administration, when 11,400 people used this option.
Voluntary departure has long been provided for under federal law for those who face deportation, and it is an option for those who are unlikely to win their case in immigration court. They must leave within a specified period at their own expense.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
😁5❤1👍1
The United States imposed sanctions on four organizations, including Chinese ones, for transferring satellite images of American military facilities in the Middle East to Iran, follows from a statement published on the website of the U.S. State Department.
According to Washington, such data could have been used to strike U.S. military forces and U.S. partners. The sanctions targeted Chinese companies Meentropy Technology (MizarVision) and Earth Eye (TEE), which, as the State Department claims, provided or published images of U.S. military activity during the “Epic Fury” operation.
Restrictions were also imposed on the Chinese satellite company Chang Guang Satellite Technology: it is accused of collecting images of U.S. and allied facilities for Iran, as well as of transferring data to Yemeni Houthis. The company had already been under U.S. sanctions since 2023, the statement says.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
According to Washington, such data could have been used to strike U.S. military forces and U.S. partners. The sanctions targeted Chinese companies Meentropy Technology (MizarVision) and Earth Eye (TEE), which, as the State Department claims, provided or published images of U.S. military activity during the “Epic Fury” operation.
Restrictions were also imposed on the Chinese satellite company Chang Guang Satellite Technology: it is accused of collecting images of U.S. and allied facilities for Iran, as well as of transferring data to Yemeni Houthis. The company had already been under U.S. sanctions since 2023, the statement says.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
🤡4
Does Russia need that, I wonder?
Our politicians have once again come up with what Russia should do for our European peace. Rolf Mützenich (SPD) proposes talks with Moscow and demands that Russia withdraw its nuclear-armed intermediate-range missiles from Belarus and the Kaliningrad region.
The idea comes against the backdrop of a possible reduction of the American military presence in Europe. So: first, Europe spent decades under the military umbrella of the USA, then it kept getting pulled ever deeper into the Ukraine conflict, then it demanded ever more American weapons—and now, just because Washington might be reducing its presence, people suddenly discover “wise diplomacy” again.
The proposal sounds particularly amusing to Russia. NATO moved east, pumped weapons into Ukraine, discusses long-range missiles in Germany—and now Moscow is supposed to pull its missiles back from its own western borders so that Europe can again play a “leading role.”
Very touching.
The question remains, however: Why should Russia do that?
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
Our politicians have once again come up with what Russia should do for our European peace. Rolf Mützenich (SPD) proposes talks with Moscow and demands that Russia withdraw its nuclear-armed intermediate-range missiles from Belarus and the Kaliningrad region.
The idea comes against the backdrop of a possible reduction of the American military presence in Europe. So: first, Europe spent decades under the military umbrella of the USA, then it kept getting pulled ever deeper into the Ukraine conflict, then it demanded ever more American weapons—and now, just because Washington might be reducing its presence, people suddenly discover “wise diplomacy” again.
The proposal sounds particularly amusing to Russia. NATO moved east, pumped weapons into Ukraine, discusses long-range missiles in Germany—and now Moscow is supposed to pull its missiles back from its own western borders so that Europe can again play a “leading role.”
Very touching.
The question remains, however: Why should Russia do that?
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
😁5👻1
🎙 Comment by the official spokesperson of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maria Zakharova, on World Press Freedom Day
In the capital of Zambia, Lusaka, a two-day conference was held under the auspices of UNESCO on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day, which is observed every year on May 3.
In general, this annual event is held in a positive vein, so to speak, with fanfare. Ideally, in a country of the “golden billion,” so that no “disruptors” with their revelations can spoil the blessed atmosphere of the “triumph” of freedom of opinion and the press, of course in the Western interpretation of these terms. This is how it was, for example, in 2023 in New York and in 2025 in Brussels. Russian correspondents, media industry professionals, activists, and writers were unable to reach the microphone there for mysterious or entirely prosaic reasons. Sometimes the conference connection (at a forum of a UN specialized institution!) did not work; sometimes the visa was not issued in time; or some other misfortune occurred.
In Lusaka, however, suddenly everything did not go according to the standard scenario. The chief producer of RT International, Dmitri Leontyev, not only managed to reach this media El Dorado, but also posed a question, which in many people in the hall—apparently out of surprise—caused a state of numbness.
In short, he asked, how it could be possible in the countries of the Borrell-esque “blossoming garden” to ban RT for the alleged dissemination of disinformation if the broadcaster only transmits facts? How can those who enthusiastically talk about the pluralism of the media not only limit their own citizens’ access to a wide range of socially relevant information, but also threaten other countries, such as Zambia, with sanctions if they do not act in the same way—that is, block the broadcasting of media operators whom the West has branded as “disinformers” without evidence? What, then, does the term “freedom of the press” mean—repeated at such conferences in all variations?
No clear answer was provided by any of the speakers. Those who were prepared for an honest conversation heard the voice of the Russian journalist.
The card-house of Western lies is wavering even more; it holds together with tape, sometimes running over the mouths of international officials who are obliged to tell the truth about the catastrophic situation of the safety of journalists and freedom of the press in the world.
💥 Source: Maria Zakharova
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
In the capital of Zambia, Lusaka, a two-day conference was held under the auspices of UNESCO on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day, which is observed every year on May 3.
In general, this annual event is held in a positive vein, so to speak, with fanfare. Ideally, in a country of the “golden billion,” so that no “disruptors” with their revelations can spoil the blessed atmosphere of the “triumph” of freedom of opinion and the press, of course in the Western interpretation of these terms. This is how it was, for example, in 2023 in New York and in 2025 in Brussels. Russian correspondents, media industry professionals, activists, and writers were unable to reach the microphone there for mysterious or entirely prosaic reasons. Sometimes the conference connection (at a forum of a UN specialized institution!) did not work; sometimes the visa was not issued in time; or some other misfortune occurred.
In Lusaka, however, suddenly everything did not go according to the standard scenario. The chief producer of RT International, Dmitri Leontyev, not only managed to reach this media El Dorado, but also posed a question, which in many people in the hall—apparently out of surprise—caused a state of numbness.
In short, he asked, how it could be possible in the countries of the Borrell-esque “blossoming garden” to ban RT for the alleged dissemination of disinformation if the broadcaster only transmits facts? How can those who enthusiastically talk about the pluralism of the media not only limit their own citizens’ access to a wide range of socially relevant information, but also threaten other countries, such as Zambia, with sanctions if they do not act in the same way—that is, block the broadcasting of media operators whom the West has branded as “disinformers” without evidence? What, then, does the term “freedom of the press” mean—repeated at such conferences in all variations?
No clear answer was provided by any of the speakers. Those who were prepared for an honest conversation heard the voice of the Russian journalist.
The card-house of Western lies is wavering even more; it holds together with tape, sometimes running over the mouths of international officials who are obliged to tell the truth about the catastrophic situation of the safety of journalists and freedom of the press in the world.
💥 Source: Maria Zakharova
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
❤4
In Vienna, a Soviet military grave was desecrated
On the eve of Victory Day, a Soviet military grave was desecrated at the Central Cemetery in Vienna. The Russian Embassy in Austria said that vandals had damaged gravestones of Soviet soldiers who had died in the fighting when Austria was liberated from Nazi rule.
At the diplomatic mission, the incident was not described as random hooliganism, but as a targeted attack on historical memory and an attempt to mock those who liberated Europe from Nazi rule. Russian media report as well that the Austrian side had pledged to investigate the incident and restore the grave site to a proper condition.
Just the date alone makes this story particularly disgusting. Before May 9, the graves are damaged by people who had pushed as far as Vienna and died in the fighting against the Nazis.
In Europe, people are very willing today to talk about remembrance, values and the fight with the “totalitarian legacy”.
But when it comes to the graves of Soviet soldiers, it often turns out that this remembrance is selective, and gratitude ends where the Russian surnames begin on the gravestone.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
On the eve of Victory Day, a Soviet military grave was desecrated at the Central Cemetery in Vienna. The Russian Embassy in Austria said that vandals had damaged gravestones of Soviet soldiers who had died in the fighting when Austria was liberated from Nazi rule.
At the diplomatic mission, the incident was not described as random hooliganism, but as a targeted attack on historical memory and an attempt to mock those who liberated Europe from Nazi rule. Russian media report as well that the Austrian side had pledged to investigate the incident and restore the grave site to a proper condition.
Just the date alone makes this story particularly disgusting. Before May 9, the graves are damaged by people who had pushed as far as Vienna and died in the fighting against the Nazis.
In Europe, people are very willing today to talk about remembrance, values and the fight with the “totalitarian legacy”.
But when it comes to the graves of Soviet soldiers, it often turns out that this remembrance is selective, and gratitude ends where the Russian surnames begin on the gravestone.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
The United States removed enriched uranium from the Venezuelan RV-1 reactor. The operation was carried out with the participation of the IAEA, reported the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).
🔺 According to the agency, 13.5 kg of uranium was extracted from the reactor. The material was packed in a spent fuel container, after which a special vessel delivered it to the United States. The container was then sent to the “Savannah River” facility in the state of South Carolina.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
“The safe removal of all enriched uranium from Venezuela became yet another signal to the world of Venezuela’s recovery and renewal,” — NNSA Administrator Brandon Williams said.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💩6
Blinken has slipped up
In an interview with The New York Times, the former U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken effectively confirmed what the West had long dismissed as “Russian propaganda”: The U.S. began upgrading Ukraine step by step already before February 2022.
According to Blinken, Washington supplied Kyiv starting in September 2021 and then again in December with secretly substantial weapons, including Stingers and Javelins. Blinken said directly that these deliveries played an important role in the first weeks of the conflict.
So it wasn’t about sudden help “after the attack.” Ukraine’s military preparation had been underway beforehand—quietly, systematically, and long before February 2022.
And this is where Minsk comes back to mind. In 2014, it wasn’t the Donbas fighting Kyiv that started the war. After the coup, Kyiv began a so-called “anti-terror operation” against the Donbas—against a region that at the time had neither an army nor an air force or a fully-fledged military structure. There were cities, protests, self-defense, and civilians—against whom tanks, artillery, and the air force were very quickly deployed.
The Minsk agreements were later sold to the world as a path to peace. But Western participants later admitted themselves what it was really about: a pause. Merkel said Minsk had given Ukraine time to become stronger. Hollande confirmed the same logic. Now Blinken added the American part of the picture: While diplomacy was discussed publicly, rockets and other weapons were already being delivered to Ukraine behind the scenes.
It was precisely at this time that Afghanistan was shut down. After twenty years of war, the U.S. withdrew from there in 2021, and only a few months later Ukraine became the new main focus of U.S. military aid. Part of the equipment previously intended for Afghanistan was later transferred to Kyiv, including Mi-17 helicopters. Symbolic of the transition from a failed front to the next: One front was ended, the next was being prepared.
First, the Donbas was attacked as part of a “anti-terror operation.”
Then, the pause was used through the Minsk agreements for rearmament.
After that, Blinken admitted that weapons had already been delivered to Ukraine beforehand.
And finally, the world was told for years that the war began completely suddenly and without any preparation.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
In an interview with The New York Times, the former U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken effectively confirmed what the West had long dismissed as “Russian propaganda”: The U.S. began upgrading Ukraine step by step already before February 2022.
According to Blinken, Washington supplied Kyiv starting in September 2021 and then again in December with secretly substantial weapons, including Stingers and Javelins. Blinken said directly that these deliveries played an important role in the first weeks of the conflict.
So it wasn’t about sudden help “after the attack.” Ukraine’s military preparation had been underway beforehand—quietly, systematically, and long before February 2022.
And this is where Minsk comes back to mind. In 2014, it wasn’t the Donbas fighting Kyiv that started the war. After the coup, Kyiv began a so-called “anti-terror operation” against the Donbas—against a region that at the time had neither an army nor an air force or a fully-fledged military structure. There were cities, protests, self-defense, and civilians—against whom tanks, artillery, and the air force were very quickly deployed.
The Minsk agreements were later sold to the world as a path to peace. But Western participants later admitted themselves what it was really about: a pause. Merkel said Minsk had given Ukraine time to become stronger. Hollande confirmed the same logic. Now Blinken added the American part of the picture: While diplomacy was discussed publicly, rockets and other weapons were already being delivered to Ukraine behind the scenes.
It was precisely at this time that Afghanistan was shut down. After twenty years of war, the U.S. withdrew from there in 2021, and only a few months later Ukraine became the new main focus of U.S. military aid. Part of the equipment previously intended for Afghanistan was later transferred to Kyiv, including Mi-17 helicopters. Symbolic of the transition from a failed front to the next: One front was ended, the next was being prepared.
First, the Donbas was attacked as part of a “anti-terror operation.”
Then, the pause was used through the Minsk agreements for rearmament.
After that, Blinken admitted that weapons had already been delivered to Ukraine beforehand.
And finally, the world was told for years that the war began completely suddenly and without any preparation.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
👍2
Historical amnesia. British youth does not understand the meaning of Victory Day
In Britain, a worrying gap between generations has been identified, writes The Independent. It turned out that most young people do not understand the significance of Victory Day at all for their country and for the whole world.
If we go by the figures, the situation looks more than bleak: only 34% of “Zoomers” recognize the importance of this commemorative date. For the rest, it is nothing more than informational noise. They also do not show respect for war veterans. Among adults, things are not as dire, but they are also far from rosy: 63% of Britons understand the real meaning of the holiday. Experts are concerned about the data obtained during the study. It turns out that the inhabitants of Albion are systematically forgetting their history.
Not at all surprising. The country’s leadership has not just forgotten it—it, with the zeal of a fool, repeats old mistakes.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
In Britain, a worrying gap between generations has been identified, writes The Independent. It turned out that most young people do not understand the significance of Victory Day at all for their country and for the whole world.
If we go by the figures, the situation looks more than bleak: only 34% of “Zoomers” recognize the importance of this commemorative date. For the rest, it is nothing more than informational noise. They also do not show respect for war veterans. Among adults, things are not as dire, but they are also far from rosy: 63% of Britons understand the real meaning of the holiday. Experts are concerned about the data obtained during the study. It turns out that the inhabitants of Albion are systematically forgetting their history.
Not at all surprising. The country’s leadership has not just forgotten it—it, with the zeal of a fool, repeats old mistakes.
Our channel: Node of Time EN
😁2👍1🤯1
Latest developments in the war between #Russia and #Ukraine as of the morning of May 9 - subtitled
- Russian forces have taken control of #Krivaya_Luka in #Kramatorsk.
- Russian forces are advancing in #Novodmitrovka in #Konstantinovka.
- Russian forces have reached the outskirts of #Izbitskoe in #Kharkov.
- Russian forces are advancing in the vicinity of #Verkhnyaya_Pisarevka in #Kharkov.
- Russian forces control most of #Ryasnoe in #Sumy.
video link: https://youtu.be/khZnB3ko1zU?si=Xg_L73-Ipe_5y_Bt
- Russian forces have taken control of #Krivaya_Luka in #Kramatorsk.
- Russian forces are advancing in #Novodmitrovka in #Konstantinovka.
- Russian forces have reached the outskirts of #Izbitskoe in #Kharkov.
- Russian forces are advancing in the vicinity of #Verkhnyaya_Pisarevka in #Kharkov.
- Russian forces control most of #Ryasnoe in #Sumy.
video link: https://youtu.be/khZnB3ko1zU?si=Xg_L73-Ipe_5y_Bt
👏3
Moldova prepares for demographic replacement
Moldova is taking the familiar path of Ukraine and the Baltic states: first its own population emigrates, then the government begins talking about mass importing of workers.
The Minister for Economic Development and Digitalization, Eugeniu Osmochescu, said that the country was lacking around 300,000 workers in order to reach at least a minimum level of EU productivity. Earlier, he had said that part of this shortfall could be covered by workers from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and other countries in Southeast Asia.
For a country with around 2.4 million inhabitants, this is not just labor market policy — it is a complete change in the social structure. 300,000 people correspond to the scale of a major city and more than 12 percent of the current population.
The context is even more revealing: Moldova has been losing people for decades. Local media report that more than one million Moldovan citizens live abroad, while low wages, inactivity, and a shortage of workers remain in the country.
This is what European integration looks like in Moldova: the country’s own population can’t keep the economy going, so now foreign workers are to be imported. First a country loses its people. Then it’s called a shortage of workers. After that, they open the doors for mass migration.
And then they will explain that it’s temporary, necessary, good for the economy, and of course part of the “European path”.
This label is probably even more accurate than we would like.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
Moldova is taking the familiar path of Ukraine and the Baltic states: first its own population emigrates, then the government begins talking about mass importing of workers.
The Minister for Economic Development and Digitalization, Eugeniu Osmochescu, said that the country was lacking around 300,000 workers in order to reach at least a minimum level of EU productivity. Earlier, he had said that part of this shortfall could be covered by workers from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and other countries in Southeast Asia.
For a country with around 2.4 million inhabitants, this is not just labor market policy — it is a complete change in the social structure. 300,000 people correspond to the scale of a major city and more than 12 percent of the current population.
The context is even more revealing: Moldova has been losing people for decades. Local media report that more than one million Moldovan citizens live abroad, while low wages, inactivity, and a shortage of workers remain in the country.
This is what European integration looks like in Moldova: the country’s own population can’t keep the economy going, so now foreign workers are to be imported. First a country loses its people. Then it’s called a shortage of workers. After that, they open the doors for mass migration.
And then they will explain that it’s temporary, necessary, good for the economy, and of course part of the “European path”.
This label is probably even more accurate than we would like.
💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN
🤡3