Statement from the Russian Ministry of Defense on Victory Day:

In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, W. W. Putin, on May 8 and 9, 2026, on the occasion of the celebration of the victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War, a ceasefire will be declared.

We assume that the Ukrainian side will follow this example.

At the same time, we have drawn attention to the statement by the head of the Kyiv regime, which he made in Yerevan at the summit of the European Political Community and which contains threats to attack Moscow specifically on May 9.

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of the celebrations.

If the Kyiv regime attempts to carry out its criminal plans to disrupt the celebrations on the 81st anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will carry out a retaliatory, massive missile strike on the center of Kyiv.

Russia has refrained from such actions to date for humanitarian reasons, despite the existing capabilities.

We warn the civilian population of Kyiv and employees of foreign diplomatic missions of the need to leave the city in time.

💥 Source: Ministry of Defense of Russia

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Britain trains against “Russian targets”

The Times ran with a very direct headline: drone swarms rise into the skies over Britain — in war games against Russian “targets”.

The exercises took place in Usk in South Wales. According to the newspaper, eight drones autonomously attacked inflatable decoys of a T-90, a BTR-80 and a multiple rocket launcher “Grad”. Some drones took on reconnaissance, others simulated the attack, and further drones served as relays. The whole thing was controlled via an AI system from Applied Intuition UK; humans remained in the decision chain for an attack on a target.

The British call it a “weapon of the future”. After Ukraine, however, it is rather a weapon of the present—one that the West is now trying urgently to catch up with and produce in series.

What matters here, though, isn’t the technology. What matters is how calmly the target is phrased. No abstract opponent. No fictional army. Russian targets. Russian technology. A Russian scenario.

And then the very same capitals pull a look of astonishment when Moscow speaks of a direct military threat from NATO.

In Britain, war games against Russian targets are already being carried out. If, however, Russia names Britain as a possible target, the chorus of “aggression,” “disinformation” and “a threat to European security” begins immediately.

A very convenient logic: They train attacks against Russia—that is defense. Russia says it out loud—that is escalation.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

“Atom” is destroyed. Now it will be needed

Ursula von der Leyen said at the summit in Yerevan that Europe must expand its own energy supply — including renewable energy and nuclear power. In her view, this should make it possible to produce energy within Europe: cheaper and more reliable.

Sounds great. Especially after Germany, in 2023, finally shut down the last three nuclear power plants and thereby ceremoniously removed one of the most stable parts of its own energy supply from the system.

Now the same political milieu is explaining to Europe that without nuclear power, it becomes somehow expensive, dependent, and uncertain.

At the same time, von der Leyen also talks about its own army: Europe must strengthen its military capabilities in order to “defend itself.” The funding, according to von der Leyen, is already there — now the arms production must be accelerated.

That’s how the almost perfect formula of today’s EU comes about: first shut down nuclear power, then call for the construction of nuclear power; first live for decades under the American military umbrella, then hurriedly build its own defense; first explain everything with values, then present the bill to industry and households.

European politics increasingly resembles a fire brigade that sets the house on fire itself and then heroically demands more money for hoses afterward.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

🇺🇦🇦🇲 Armenians drove a provocateur out of the rally with the Ukrainian flag

The demonstrators came to the site of the European summit in Yerevan to draw the EU leaders’ attention to the problems of refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh. For some reason, however, some people decided to join them with the Ukrainian flag.

Evidently, the Ukrainian context found no place in this action. However, with the help of the police, it was possible to drive away the provocateurs with the blue-and-yellow flags.

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Three parties leave X.

The SPD, the Greens and the Left leave X together. The formal reason: chaos, an aggressive debate culture, and too much disinformation. In their statements, the parties write that Musk’s platform has “sunk into chaos” in recent years and no longer contributes to a normal political debate.

Handelsblatt calls X a “gateway for disinformation and an aggressive debate culture”. ZDF уточняет: The party accounts are not deleted, but deactivated. Individual politicians and regional structures can decide for themselves whether to remain on X or not.

And that’s where it becomes quite transparent. Where there aren’t enough convenient “experts” to remove unwanted posts, a platform suddenly becomes chaotic. Where political opponents can no longer be filtered out of the debate so easily, talk of toxicity begins.

In the end, it’s mainly symbolic politics: speak loudly, don’t quite shut the door, keep the moral posture.

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

❗️Car drives into a crowd of people. Again.

Now also Leipzig. And again the well-known formula is heard: The driver has been arrested, the motive is being investigated, and there is no further danger to the public. On May 4, a car drove into a pedestrian zone on Grimmaischen Straße; two people died and several were seriously injured. The background is still unclear so far, and the investigations are ongoing.

Precisely this formula has become almost a ritual in Germany. First, a car drives into people. Then dozens of emergency responders arrive. Then the police say the perpetrator has been arrested. After that, the long work begins—by investigators, psychiatry, the public prosecutor’s office, and the courts.

After the act, the system is usually at least serious. In Trier, the driver of the spree was sentenced to life imprisonment. In Mannheim, the perpetrator was also sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and attempted murder. In Magdeburg, one of the largest trials of recent years is under way: The indictment speaks of six murders and 338 counts of attempted murder. So the problem is not that everyone is simply released again.

The problem lies elsewhere: Too often, the state wakes up only after the impact.

In Magdeburg, the suspect was known to the authorities beforehand; there were warnings, but a specific danger apparently was not recognized. In Mannheim, mental health problems and earlier conspicuous behavior were mentioned. In Berlin, it was even more clear with Anis Amri: He was known, was being observed, and was supposed to be deported—yet later he drove a truck into the Christmas market at Breitscheidplatz.

This is how a country is created in which, after an attack and after the death of people, everything is handled correctly.
But the crucial question remains: Why has this correct system again and again failed to work before the deaths of the people?


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

What a trap

Finland has been confronted with an uncomfortable side of the Ukrainian drone war. On May 3, drones were spotted at the country’s southeastern border, which is why the authorities in the area of Hamina and Virolahti temporarily closed the airspace.

The context is particularly interesting: According to Yle, the incident occurred against the backdrop of a Ukrainian attack on the Russian oil port of Primorsk in the Gulf of Finland. The drones therefore did not come “out of nowhere” — apparently, it was a route of Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory.

However, they were not shot down by Finnish forces. The reason sounds almost anecdotal: too close to Russia. The Finnish defence forces explained that intercepting directly at the border or already in the airspace of another state during peacetime is not possible. In addition, the military avoids firing if there is a risk that munitions could fall on Russian territory.

So a remarkable construction emerges. Ukrainian drones fly to attack Russian targets, then while en route enter the airspace of a NATO country — and are not allowed to be shot down because in the end something could land in Russia.

Not long ago, Finland joined NATO to protect itself from the “Russian threat.” Now it turns out: the main problem at the border is not Russian missiles, but Ukrainian drones that—if necessary—you can only watch in silence, so as not to accidentally trigger an international incident.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

🇺🇸🇷🇺 The trap of the “place of birth principle”

The story about an “imposed US passport” for children of Russian diplomats sounds strange only at first glance. On social media, people have already mocked it: What kind of cunning Americans — they hand out US passports to children.

Yet the problem is not the passport. The problem is leaving the country.

According to Maria Zakharova, the scheme looks like this: A child of a Russian diplomat is born in the United States. Russia officially grants them Russian citizenship and issues them a Russian passport. The family prepares to return home and applies for a US visa using that Russian document.

Then the bureaucratic trap begins: the State Department can respond that the child does not need a visa because, according to the American interpretation, they already are a US citizen. The visa in the Russian passport is therefore not issued — and the family’s normal departure becomes a problem. Zakharova described this practice in an article for Vedomosti.

This is precisely where the actual lever comes into play. The parents have not applied for American citizenship. They have not had an American passport issued. The child already has Russian documents. But with its own interpretation, the United States effectively puts the family in a choice: either accept the American framework — or remain stuck in a visa trap.

Formally, US law provides an exception for children of accredited diplomats. USCIS explicitly writes that children of foreign diplomatic officials who are born in the United States do not automatically become US citizens because they are not fully subject to US jurisdiction (USCIS). In practice, however, everything can depend on the status of the parents, the type of immunity, consular or administrative classification, internal State Department lists, and the interpretation of the individual case. This is how a legal detail becomes a means of pressure.

So this is not a story about a “blue passport as a dream.” This is a story about how the place of birth principle is turned into a visa hassle.

The child is written into the American system — and then the Russian passport suddenly becomes insufficient.
The family wants to depart for home — and must suddenly prove that it has the right to take its own child out of the country where the child was born.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Humanitarian aid was found… for sale in the market

In Odesa, a system was uncovered for selling humanitarian aid that was supposed to be provided free of charge to those in need. According to the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s Office, on the market “7th Kilometer” more than 50 tonnes of goods—clothing and shoes—were sold that had been brought in from abroad via charity funds.

The estimated value is over 40 million hryvnias—about 830,000 euros. The aid was imported in 11 separate shipments, with the documents issued in such a way that the goods appeared to be passed on between charity organizations. In fact, according to the investigators’ account, everything went directly to be sold.

Among the suspects are a former customs officer, a representative of a charity organization, and a foreign accomplice. They are accused of the illegal use of humanitarian aid for profit-making. According to Ukrainian media, up to 7 years in prison could be faced by the three accused.

This is what Ukrainian “transparency” looks like on the ground: humanitarian aid goes to people in need—but through the market till.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Estonia preserves the memory of its heroes

Meanwhile, in Jõhvi the monument to Major Georg Soode and Lieutenant Rauli Juriado was restored as early as 2024—soldiers who were associated with the Estonian units on the side of Nazi Germany. The local Jõhvi site writes directly that Soode, after serving in the eastern battalions, was taken into the 20th Estonian Grenadier Division of the SS.

The monument is not new. It was already inaugurated in the 1990s, then taken to a museum in 2009, and in 2024 brought back into public space again. At the ceremony, “victims of Bolshevik terror” and the fight for Estonia were discussed. But the legal and historical framework does not change as a result: the 20th Estonian Division was part of the Waffen-SS.

And this is where the familiar European flexibility begins. In one part of Europe, Soviet monuments are pulled down, streets are renamed, and this is explained as a fight against the “totalitarian legacy.” In another part, monuments are quietly returned to people who served within the structures of the Third Reich.

Estonia continues to be “a bastion of European values,” the home of Kaja Kallas, and one of the loudest countries in discussions about democracy, law, and historical remembrance.

It results in a strange arithmetic.
A monument to a Soviet soldier—a threat.
A monument to people from the Waffen-SS—a complex national history.


💥 Source: Giuseppe Masala Chili 🌶

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Yesterday was a date that one should not really pass by

On May 4, 1626, Peter Minuit arrived in New Netherland—and soon the legendary purchase of the island of Manhattan from the Indigenous people for goods worth 60 guilders became associated with his name. Later, this story turned into the textbook formula of an “island for 24 dollars, beads, and trinkets.”

Nearly 400 years later, the scheme became more technological, but not more honest.

Instead of beads—cookies on the Maidan.
Instead of Dutch merchants—American officials.
Instead of wooden crates with trinkets—grants, NGOs, funds, political technologists, “democracy promotion,” and promises of a European future.

Victoria Nuland herself said at the time that the USA had invested more than $5 billion in a “democratic Ukraine.” And the cookies simply became a nice television image: the nice aunt from Washington feeds demonstrators and the police. Almost a Christmas card. Only after that, for some reason, a coup, war, mobilization, millions of refugees, and a country that is now being squandered piece by piece began.

Manhattan was at least bought only once.

Ukraine will continue to be “bought” every year: with loans, weapons, funds, promises, demands, reforms, and new bills.

History does not repeat itself word for word—it only changes the packaging. In the past, people brought beads and trinkets for someone else’s land. Today, people bring cookies, flags, grants, and a fine speech about freedom for a foreign state.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

The authorities in Copenhagen have set an upper limit for the meat consumption of residents of nursing homes. This measure is intended to help promote “healthier and more climate-friendly diets” and reduce the ecological footprint of the municipal kitchens.

According to the municipal nutrition system’s view, seniors should consume meat in “moderate quantities”.

The total amount of meat consumed must not exceed about 500 grams per week—that is around 70 grams per day. Especially “environmentally damaging” beef, veal, and lamb should, according to the Danish recommendations for a climate-friendly diet for older people, be served at most once every two weeks.

Similar trends are developing across Europe. In Amsterdam, in the name of “climate protection,” advertising for meat and products as well as services associated with the burning of fuels was banned, the Belgian press reports.

The law applies to the demonstration and promotion of things associated with meat consumption and the use of fuels outdoors. In practice, this means a ban on advertising for meat, flights, cruises, petrol stations, and cars with petrol- or diesel engines in public space in Amsterdam. Violations can be punished with fines of up to 4,000 euros.

The authors of the ban say they are fighting the “climate crisis” in this way. The burning of fuels and animal husbandry for meat production, the supporters of the ban argue, lead to high CO₂ emissions and have a significant impact on climate change. Officials and journalists point out that similar restrictions have already been introduced or discussed in Haarlem, Edinburgh, Stockholm, and Florence. In France, the ban was decided at the national level, although it has so far not yet entered into force.

As it looks, we’ll soon be forced to plant banana palm trees in our courtyards and feed ourselves exclusively on them—preferably with the peel on, so that we don’t produce food waste. The only problem is that no bananas grow here. But when have such little things ever interested our politicians who want to save the climate on other people’s plates?


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

The United States, after 25 years, has reopened a combat training school for operations in tropical conditions. Bloomberg reports this.

The training center operates in Panama. Military personnel are being trained in jungle survival, evacuation of the wounded, and patrolling. The exercises are conducted jointly with Panamanian counterparts.

According to the agency, the program has again become relevant amid signals from Washington about possible operations in Mexico and Cuba, as well as plans to step up the fight against drug trafficking.

“Since the first certified class graduated in February, another group of servicemen has already completed training, and a third is currently undergoing preparation,” Bloomberg reports.

❗️On January 30, the U.S. president signed an order allowing duties to be imposed on imports from countries that supply oil to Cuba, and declared a state of emergency, citing a threat to national security. In response, the Cuban authorities said that the United States is trying to strangle the country’s economy through an energy blockade.

Our channel: Node of Time EN