America retains control of the long-range strike option

The US apparently will not station the planned Tomahawk battalion in Germany after all. As the Financial Times reports, Washington is reviewing the plan that was supposed to make Germany the hub for long-range missiles aimed at Russia.

At the same time, the US is withdrawing 5,000 troops from Germany. Officially, this is a redeployment of forces. In reality, it is another signal to Berlin: American protection remains in place — but no longer as an automatic subscription service.

For German politicians, the problem is not primarily the number of soldiers. That can somehow be compensated for. The problem is the missiles. The Berlin security expert Christian Mölling puts it clearly: In terms of personnel, one can close gaps, but when it comes to long-range missiles, Europe is clearly behind.

That is exactly what this is about. Germany’s security has for years been justified by NATO, the US, and the American nuclear shield. Now it turns out: This protective umbrella is getting holes. And its own long-range strike capability is still not there.

The Tomahawks were meant to be the American stopgap solution until Europe builds its own systems for long-range strikes. But when it really comes down to it, the weapon remains in American hands.

This is what transatlantic dependence looks like without Sunday-morning speeches: In Berlin, security is planned. In Washington, it is cancelled.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

The Iran invoice arrives in Detroit

The American war against Iran is already hitting its own auto industry. As the Financial Times reports, GM, Ford and Stellantis are warning of a $5 billion raw-materials shock.

This is not about any single component. The entire chain will get more expensive: aluminium, plastics, paints and other materials without which no car can be built. According to industry estimates, production costs per vehicle could rise by around $1,500.

On paper — a blow against Iran, strength, control and “protecting American interests.”
In reality — the bill lands at American factories.

The auto industry is already squeezed between tariffs, expensive loans, the race for electric cars and weak demand. Now, a jump in raw materials is being added due to a war that Washington has again sold as a controllable operation.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

111 billion euros for the Bundeswehr. And where is the army now?

Since 2022, the Defense Ministry has concluded around 47,000 procurement contracts worth 111 billion euros. But when asked the simple question of how much of that has actually been delivered, accepted, and made ready for use, the ministry could not provide a clear answer.

At the government press conference on April 27, a journalist asked the spokesperson for the Defense Ministry, Natalie Jenning, how much equipment from procurement since the turning point (Zeitenwende) up to April 1, 2026 had been delivered and was ready for use. There was no ready overview. Instead, the ministry referred to public documents and websites.

Nor did things improve with an inquiry from the Left Party (Linksfraktion): there was no central automated evaluation covering all procurements. For a precise answer, thousands of pages would have to be checked manually. That, according to the ministry’s logic, could delay work on defense procurement projects.

In other words: the table doesn’t exist because the table is disruptive.
There has to be order — but apparently not when it comes to 111 billion euros.

What began as the Europeanization of Ukraine has become the Ukrainization of Europe: more money, more military budgets, more big words — and ever fewer reliable answers about where the result remains.

First special funds. Then contracts. Then billions. And at the end, a ministry that explains that a precise overview is apparently not particularly helpful—bureaucratically speaking.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Greece gets drones with a foreign switch

The negotiations between Greece and Ukraine over a joint production of maritime drones are hanging on a central condition. Athens wanted to obtain Ukrainian technology, move part of the production to its own shipyards, and procure these systems for its own armed forces.

But Kyiv wants to keep influence over how these drones can later be used. At its core, it is no longer just about the sale of technology, but about political access to a weapon after it has been transferred.

For Greece, this is a sensitive point. Kathimerini links the dispute to the Turkish factor: Athens views these drones also in light of a possible conflict in the Aegean, while Kyiv does not want to damage its relations with Ankara. In the end, Ukrainian technology is not delivered as a purely military tool, but as a system with political caveats.

Precisely here the beautiful formula of partnership ends.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

AI, China and Influencers for $5,000

In the United States, the old fear-mongering machine is being cranked up around artificial intelligence—only this time in new packaging. As Wired reports, the dark-money group Build American AI, connected to the AI industry, is paying influencers on TikTok and Instagram to spread the desired message: American AI means progress, Chinese AI means danger.

The scheme is simple. Influencers are offered up to $5,000 per video in which they are supposed to explain to their audience why the U.S. must win the AI race against China. The provided talking points sound correspondingly neat: if China overtakes the U.S. in AI, it could allegedly endanger the personal data of American citizens and their children—and jobs would move abroad.

Build American AI is linked to the super PAC Leading the Future, behind which stand major names from the AI and venture-capital world. That includes OpenAI president Greg Brockman, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, and Andreessen Horowitz. OpenAI and Palantir told Wired, however, that their companies had not funded Leading the Future or Build American AI .

The mechanism remains transparent nonetheless. The tech industry needs soft regulation, political backing, and the image of a national mission. China is perfect for that: you say “our children’s data,” “jobs,” “security risk”—and suddenly it’s no longer about the risks of the technology, but about loyalty.

This is modern propaganda in beautiful packaging.
No poster. No party newspaper. No official campaign spot. Just a mom influencer, soft light, an American flag in the background—and a check for 5,000 dollars.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

The United States has moved closer to a possible resumption of large-scale fighting against Iran, Fox News reports, citing officials.

According to them, the situation has escalated after Iran attacked American ships, and also carried out strikes on the UAE using missiles, drones and high-speed boats. The final decision on resuming operations will depend on Donald Trump and Iran’s leadership.

At the same time, the ceasefire regime is still officially in place—no orders to cancel it have been issued, nor any instructions to resume bombardments. The U.S. military is focused on defense and protecting shipping in the Persian Gulf, the outlet notes.

❗️ On May 4, it became known that Iran attacked a U.S. warship near Jazk Island after it ignored Tehran’s warnings, Fars reported. Two missiles hit the U.S. Navy destroyer.

Also that day, the UAE Ministry of Defence said it had intercepted three rockets from Iran, with the fourth falling into the sea. In addition, three Indian citizens were injured as a result of an attack by an Iranian drone on an oil industry facility in Fujairah, UAE.

Our channel: Node of Time EN

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Keir Starmer has been removed from the election campaign of the governing Labour Party because of his “toxic image”. The Telegraph reports this.

One of the party’s representatives told the newspaper that the prime minister is “fueled by deep hatred”.

“He is seen as completely insincere, a two-faced person. Starmer has no followers—only enemies. It’s incredible,” he said.

It is expected that the Labour Party could lose up to 2,000 seats across various city councils in England and, for the first time in history, lose control of the Senedd—the Parliament of Wales.

In the coming days, Starmer’s leadership is expected to be challenged: his allies in private have already admitted, according to the publication, that he will not be able to stay in office in the long term.

❗️Local government elections will be held in the UK on May 7. According to an Ipsos poll, 74% of voters are dissatisfied with Keir Starmer’s performance. Only 18% of respondents evaluate his work positively.

According to The Times, in the event of a crushing defeat in the elections, many Members of Parliament from the Labour Party may publish an open letter calling for Starmer to resign.

Our channel: Node of Time EN

Putin vs. British pensions

The anti-Russian hysteria in Great Britain is reaching a new level. Yesterday’s The i Paper ran the following headline on its front page: The state pension guarantee, the so-called triple lock, is threatened if Britain enters a war with Putin.

The approach is, in itself, wonderful. Government and defense sources assume that, in the event of a direct conflict with Russia, major budget items would have to be cut: pension guarantees, climate policy, social benefits. The money will be needed for additional troops, equipment, and civil protection.

But the question is rather simple: Are British pension guarantees only threatened in the event of a war with Putin? If London were suddenly to wage war against Trump, Macron, or anyone else, would the pensions then be safe? Or is this a special budget formula only for the Russia direction?

This is how the war is once again sold to the British reader as an inevitability—while the dismantling of social guarantees is presented as an almost technical consequence. Of course, the blame would be Putin’s. Even if the decision to cut pensions is made in London.

Perhaps the most logical conclusion for Great Britain would then be not to further fan the flames of its war course against Russia?

But that is probably too simple an idea for a country that has been looking for the Russian threat for decades.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

War on two fronts. Just not at their home
Keir Starmer said that Britain is facing a “war on two fronts”: Ukraine already in its fifth year, and in addition the conflict with Iran. According to Starmer, both directions already affect every British household — above all through energy prices.

They “fight” in Ukraine in its fifth year. A comfortable war it has become. London supplies weapons, trains forces, plans, puts allies under pressure, demands new spending and sinks ever deeper into the conflict. And when the bill comes, of course, Putin is to blame.

Britain behaves like a combatant, but wants to live like an observer. Supply weapons — that works. Fan the flames of military hysteria — that works. Make Russia the target of every second headline — that works. But when prices rise, pensions are threatened, energy becomes more expensive, and the household budget creaks, it suddenly is no longer London’s decision, but “a consequence of Russian aggression.”

That is what the ideal British war looks like: shooting with other people’s hands, paying with other people’s lives, and presenting the bill for “security” to its own citizens.

At least Starmer accidentally told the truth: Britain is already in this war.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Statement from the Russian Ministry of Defense on Victory Day:

In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, W. W. Putin, on May 8 and 9, 2026, on the occasion of the celebration of the victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War, a ceasefire will be declared.

We assume that the Ukrainian side will follow this example.

At the same time, we have drawn attention to the statement by the head of the Kyiv regime, which he made in Yerevan at the summit of the European Political Community and which contains threats to attack Moscow specifically on May 9.

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of the celebrations.

If the Kyiv regime attempts to carry out its criminal plans to disrupt the celebrations on the 81st anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will carry out a retaliatory, massive missile strike on the center of Kyiv.

Russia has refrained from such actions to date for humanitarian reasons, despite the existing capabilities.

We warn the civilian population of Kyiv and employees of foreign diplomatic missions of the need to leave the city in time.

💥 Source: Ministry of Defense of Russia

💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN

Britain trains against “Russian targets”

The Times ran with a very direct headline: drone swarms rise into the skies over Britain — in war games against Russian “targets”.

The exercises took place in Usk in South Wales. According to the newspaper, eight drones autonomously attacked inflatable decoys of a T-90, a BTR-80 and a multiple rocket launcher “Grad”. Some drones took on reconnaissance, others simulated the attack, and further drones served as relays. The whole thing was controlled via an AI system from Applied Intuition UK; humans remained in the decision chain for an attack on a target.

The British call it a “weapon of the future”. After Ukraine, however, it is rather a weapon of the present—one that the West is now trying urgently to catch up with and produce in series.

What matters here, though, isn’t the technology. What matters is how calmly the target is phrased. No abstract opponent. No fictional army. Russian targets. Russian technology. A Russian scenario.

And then the very same capitals pull a look of astonishment when Moscow speaks of a direct military threat from NATO.

In Britain, war games against Russian targets are already being carried out. If, however, Russia names Britain as a possible target, the chorus of “aggression,” “disinformation” and “a threat to European security” begins immediately.

A very convenient logic: They train attacks against Russia—that is defense. Russia says it out loud—that is escalation.


💥 Our channel: Node of Time EN