sniamod dab
moctodsysenc
tsohtodtluavspv

https://github.com/salesforce/hassh 😐

https://github.com/salesforce/ja3 😐

It is not recommended to utilize this resource, as software developed by an unknown entity and maintained in a newly established repository. such repo usually contains significant vulnerabilities. Despite these concerns, it is often cited as the sole available solution for iran now

One or two servers without anti-spoofing measures are still required. Most prominent data centers have already implemented this security barrier.

When Google operates, this process functions slowly and requires specific attention to deploy. It currently contains numerous issues.

this one also uses google... and its working
https://github.com/Kianmhz/GooseRelayVPN

dns tunnel works
+ to make it work , you need addresses of domestic resolvers .

https://github.com/masterking32/MasterDnsVPN

one can bypass using
https://github.com/avacocloud/XHTTP-Installer +
https://github.com/B3hnamR/XHTTPRelayECO +
https://networksdb.io/ip-addresses-of/vercel-inc +
https://github.com/alixtron0/vscanner

[ "empty sni" actually workes ]

Starlink has also proved crucial to other operations. After Iran cracked down on protests in January, killing thousands of people, the Trump administration smuggled in more than 6,000 Starlink terminals to provide internet access to citizens, the Wall Street Journal previously reported.

As the war intensified, however, Iranian authorities confiscated the terminals and deployed jamming devices across major cities to disrupt connections, according to a source familiar with the matter. Within a week of the conflict beginning, Pentagon officials began discussions with SpaceX about deploying direct-to-cell service that could bypass those disruptions, two people familiar with the matter said. The capability, similar to a 5G connection, would allow users to connect without terminals on the ground.

SpaceX, which generated $11.4 billion in revenue from Starlink in 2025, proposed charging as much as $500 million to launch the capability, along with a $100 million monthly fee to operate it, according to one of the people and Pentagon documents - prompting alarm from defense officials over the price. 😐 😐 😐
Reuters could not determine whether an agreement has been reached.

(Reporting by David Jeans; editing by Joe Brock and Anna Driver)
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/technology/exclusive-pentagon-spars-with-spacex-over-starlink-price-hike-during-iran-war/ar-AA247r5f