Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Anonymous Quiz
0%
(a) 1 and 2 only
12%
(b) 2 and 3 only
15%
(c) 1 and 3 only
73%
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Consider the following statements:
The Parliament of India can place a particular law in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
The validity of a law placed in the Ninth Schedule cannot be examined by any court. Select the correct option:
The Parliament of India can place a particular law in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
The validity of a law placed in the Ninth Schedule cannot be examined by any court. Select the correct option:
Anonymous Quiz
76%
(a) 1 only
0%
(b) 2 only
20%
(c) Both 1 and 2
4%
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
With reference to Public Interest Litigation (PIL), consider the following statements:
1.Any public-spirited citizen can move the court for public cause.
2.The court may permit the filing of a letter as a writ petition. Select the correct answer:
1.Any public-spirited citizen can move the court for public cause.
2.The court may permit the filing of a letter as a writ petition. Select the correct answer:
Anonymous Quiz
16%
(a) 1 only
0%
(b) 2 only
84%
(c) Both 1 and 2
0%
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
The concept of “Judicial Activism” in India implies
Anonymous Quiz
70%
(a) The judiciary takes suo motu cognizance of matters
17%
(b) The judiciary oversteps its jurisdiction
13%
(c) The judiciary strictly adheres to the letter of the law
0%
(d) The judiciary functions under executive control
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
1.The Supreme Court of India is empowered to review its own judgments.
2.The Supreme Court of India can transfer certain cases from one High Court to another High Court. Select the correct answer:
1.The Supreme Court of India is empowered to review its own judgments.
2.The Supreme Court of India can transfer certain cases from one High Court to another High Court. Select the correct answer:
Anonymous Quiz
13%
(a) 1 only
3%
(b) 2 only
78%
(c) Both 1 and 2
6%
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Lines in the sand: On India and the Pax Silica alliance”
Introduction
• India has formally joined the U.S.-led Pax Silica alliance, a global initiative to secure technology supply chains — especially for semiconductors, AI infrastructure and critical minerals. 
• The move comes at a time of heightened strategic competition with China and evolving India-U.S. relations. 
• The editorial’s title suggests a focus on “lines in the sand” — i.e., how India is defining its priorities, limits, and strategic autonomy in the face of global tech blocs.
⸻
Body
• What Pax Silica is: A U.S.-proposed coalition aimed at building trusted, resilient technology supply chains across key sectors (AI hardware, semiconductors, critical minerals), reducing dependence on any one dominant supplier. 
• Why India joined: New Delhi sees value in securing tech access, deepening market and supply-chain integration, and gaining investment and capacity-building in high tech sectors. 
• Strategic calibration: While India is aligning with U.S. partners on economic and tech security, it also maintains an independent foreign policy, avoiding being seen as in a full geopolitical bloc against any single country. 
• Economic and geopolitical context: India’s joining comes amid efforts to normalise bilateral ties with Washington after trade and tariff tensions and amid broader negotiations on technology cooperation and market access. 
• Caveats and boundaries: Editorially, this likely reflects concerns about ensuring that membership doesn’t erode India’s strategic autonomy or pull it into rigid blocs, signalling where India draws its lines in the sand between cooperation and dependence.
⸻
Conclusion
• India’s inclusion in Pax Silica marks a significant step in global technology diplomacy, underlining its rising tech role. 
• The alliance reflects broader shifts in global geopolitical and economic order — from old trade pacts to supply-chain and tech security blocs. 
• But for India, the key is balancing cooperation with autonomy — participating where strategic and economic interests align, while avoiding entanglement that might compromise independent decision-making in global affairs.
Introduction
• India has formally joined the U.S.-led Pax Silica alliance, a global initiative to secure technology supply chains — especially for semiconductors, AI infrastructure and critical minerals. 
• The move comes at a time of heightened strategic competition with China and evolving India-U.S. relations. 
• The editorial’s title suggests a focus on “lines in the sand” — i.e., how India is defining its priorities, limits, and strategic autonomy in the face of global tech blocs.
⸻
Body
• What Pax Silica is: A U.S.-proposed coalition aimed at building trusted, resilient technology supply chains across key sectors (AI hardware, semiconductors, critical minerals), reducing dependence on any one dominant supplier. 
• Why India joined: New Delhi sees value in securing tech access, deepening market and supply-chain integration, and gaining investment and capacity-building in high tech sectors. 
• Strategic calibration: While India is aligning with U.S. partners on economic and tech security, it also maintains an independent foreign policy, avoiding being seen as in a full geopolitical bloc against any single country. 
• Economic and geopolitical context: India’s joining comes amid efforts to normalise bilateral ties with Washington after trade and tariff tensions and amid broader negotiations on technology cooperation and market access. 
• Caveats and boundaries: Editorially, this likely reflects concerns about ensuring that membership doesn’t erode India’s strategic autonomy or pull it into rigid blocs, signalling where India draws its lines in the sand between cooperation and dependence.
⸻
Conclusion
• India’s inclusion in Pax Silica marks a significant step in global technology diplomacy, underlining its rising tech role. 
• The alliance reflects broader shifts in global geopolitical and economic order — from old trade pacts to supply-chain and tech security blocs. 
• But for India, the key is balancing cooperation with autonomy — participating where strategic and economic interests align, while avoiding entanglement that might compromise independent decision-making in global affairs.
❤3
Daily Hindu Editorial 24Feb2026
📌 Introduction
AI for all: on the India AI Impact Summit 2026
The India AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi marked a major global technology gathering, aiming to position artificial intelligence as an inclusive force for social good rather than exclusive commercial power. The summit brought together governments, AI firms, innovators and civil society to shape a people-centric and responsible AI future. 
⸻
📌 Key Points (Crisp Bullet Body)
🌍 Global Participation & Vision
• Hosted at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi from mid-February 2026. 
• Delegations from 100+ countries, including large powers and developing nations. 
• Summit theme focused on “AI for All” — stressing equitable access, ethical standards, and global cooperation. 
🤝 Delhi Declaration & Shared Principles
• 88 countries signed the New Delhi Declaration advocating inclusive, democratic and responsible AI governance. 
• Declaration pillars: democratising AI resources, economic & social good, trusted systems, and human-capital development. 
• Underlying ethos: Sarvajan Hitaya, Sarvajan Sukhaya — welfare and happiness for all. 
📊 Investments & Economic Impact
• Summit saw commitments exceeding $250 billion in AI infrastructure, innovation and partnerships. 
• Major deals spanned data centres, sovereign AI models, and global tech integrations. 
🤖 Responsible & Inclusive AI Goals
• Emphasis on ethical, transparent and accessible AI rather than monopolistic tech dominance. 
• Focus on AI for public services: healthcare, education, agriculture, governance and skill building. 
• Call for policies tackling bias, safety, accountability and democratic access. 
🧠 Human-Centric Approach
• Discussion on preparing societies through education, skilling and awareness for AI transitions. 
• Recognition that AI should augment human work and uplift communities. 
🌐 Global South & Bridge-Building
• Summit underscored India’s role as a bridge between advanced and developing nations in shaping AI’s future. 
• Push to ensure that digital divides don’t widen in the AI era. 
📌 Introduction
AI for all: on the India AI Impact Summit 2026
The India AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi marked a major global technology gathering, aiming to position artificial intelligence as an inclusive force for social good rather than exclusive commercial power. The summit brought together governments, AI firms, innovators and civil society to shape a people-centric and responsible AI future. 
⸻
📌 Key Points (Crisp Bullet Body)
🌍 Global Participation & Vision
• Hosted at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi from mid-February 2026. 
• Delegations from 100+ countries, including large powers and developing nations. 
• Summit theme focused on “AI for All” — stressing equitable access, ethical standards, and global cooperation. 
🤝 Delhi Declaration & Shared Principles
• 88 countries signed the New Delhi Declaration advocating inclusive, democratic and responsible AI governance. 
• Declaration pillars: democratising AI resources, economic & social good, trusted systems, and human-capital development. 
• Underlying ethos: Sarvajan Hitaya, Sarvajan Sukhaya — welfare and happiness for all. 
📊 Investments & Economic Impact
• Summit saw commitments exceeding $250 billion in AI infrastructure, innovation and partnerships. 
• Major deals spanned data centres, sovereign AI models, and global tech integrations. 
🤖 Responsible & Inclusive AI Goals
• Emphasis on ethical, transparent and accessible AI rather than monopolistic tech dominance. 
• Focus on AI for public services: healthcare, education, agriculture, governance and skill building. 
• Call for policies tackling bias, safety, accountability and democratic access. 
🧠 Human-Centric Approach
• Discussion on preparing societies through education, skilling and awareness for AI transitions. 
• Recognition that AI should augment human work and uplift communities. 
🌐 Global South & Bridge-Building
• Summit underscored India’s role as a bridge between advanced and developing nations in shaping AI’s future. 
• Push to ensure that digital divides don’t widen in the AI era. 
❤2
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Anonymous Quiz
32%
(a) 1 only
0%
(b) 2 only
68%
(c) Both 1 and 2
0%
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Anonymous Quiz
18%
(a) 1 only
6%
(b) 2 only
76%
(c) Both 1 and 2
0%
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Anonymous Quiz
18%
(a) 1 only
12%
(b) 2 only
0%
(c) Both 1 and 2
71%
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Anonymous Quiz
44%
(a) 1 only
6%
(b) 2 only
44%
(c) Both 1 and 2
6%
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
The Attorney General of India can
1. Participate in the proceedings of the Lok Sabha.
2. Vote in the Lok Sabha. 3. Participate in the joint sitting of the two Houses of Parliament. Select the correct answer:
1. Participate in the proceedings of the Lok Sabha.
2. Vote in the Lok Sabha. 3. Participate in the joint sitting of the two Houses of Parliament. Select the correct answer:
Anonymous Quiz
11%
(a) 1 and 2 only
0%
(b) 2 and 3 only
79%
(c) 1 and 3 only
11%
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Daily Hindu Editorial 28 Feb 2026
Up in the air: on non-scheduled operators, aviation safety
Introduction
Recent accidents involving non-scheduled flight operators have raised serious concerns about aviation safety in India. While scheduled airlines operate under strict regulatory frameworks, charter services, air ambulances, and private operators often function with comparatively lighter scrutiny. The editorial highlights the urgent need to strengthen oversight of this growing segment to ensure passenger safety.
🔹 Core Issue
• Rising accidents involving non-scheduled operators (NSOPs) raise safety concerns.
• Charter flights, air ambulances, and private jets under scrutiny.
🔹 Key Concerns
• Safety oversight weaker than scheduled airlines.
• Maintenance and training gaps in smaller operators.
• Commercial/VIP pressure affecting pilot decisions.
• Poor safety management systems in some firms.
• Regulatory enforcement inconsistencies.
🔹 Regulatory Response
• Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) tightening audits and inspections.
• Zero-tolerance policy on safety violations.
• Greater management accountability.
• Emphasis on respecting pilot-in-command authority.
🔹 Editorial Stand
• Safety standards must be uniform across aviation sectors.
• Growth of aviation must not outpace regulation.
• Strong oversight and safety culture essential to prevent tragedies.
Up in the air: on non-scheduled operators, aviation safety
Introduction
Recent accidents involving non-scheduled flight operators have raised serious concerns about aviation safety in India. While scheduled airlines operate under strict regulatory frameworks, charter services, air ambulances, and private operators often function with comparatively lighter scrutiny. The editorial highlights the urgent need to strengthen oversight of this growing segment to ensure passenger safety.
🔹 Core Issue
• Rising accidents involving non-scheduled operators (NSOPs) raise safety concerns.
• Charter flights, air ambulances, and private jets under scrutiny.
🔹 Key Concerns
• Safety oversight weaker than scheduled airlines.
• Maintenance and training gaps in smaller operators.
• Commercial/VIP pressure affecting pilot decisions.
• Poor safety management systems in some firms.
• Regulatory enforcement inconsistencies.
🔹 Regulatory Response
• Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) tightening audits and inspections.
• Zero-tolerance policy on safety violations.
• Greater management accountability.
• Emphasis on respecting pilot-in-command authority.
🔹 Editorial Stand
• Safety standards must be uniform across aviation sectors.
• Growth of aviation must not outpace regulation.
• Strong oversight and safety culture essential to prevent tragedies.
Bad publicity: on AI Summit, Youth Congress protest, police action”Introduction
A protest by the Indian Youth Congress during a high-profile AI Summit in New Delhi shifted attention away from India’s technological ambitions to political controversy. The incident, followed by strong police action, generated avoidable negative publicity at an international forum.
⸻
Body
Youth Congress members disrupted the summit to protest government policies, raising slogans inside the venue. While dissent is a democratic right, staging a protest at a global platform meant to showcase India’s AI leadership was widely criticised as inappropriate.
The police responded with arrests and detentions, which in turn triggered allegations of excessive or improper action. The situation escalated into a political confrontation, overshadowing the summit’s objectives and raising concerns about coordination, proportionality, and respect for civil liberties.
The episode reflects two concerns:
• Misuse of international platforms for domestic political messaging.
• The need for measured, lawful police response that upholds democratic freedoms.
⸻
Conclusion
The controversy resulted in reputational costs for all sides. Political protests must be responsibly timed and located, especially during events of international significance. At the same time, law enforcement must act with restraint and strict adherence to procedure. Protecting both democratic expression and India’s global image requires maturity from political actors and institutions alike.
A protest by the Indian Youth Congress during a high-profile AI Summit in New Delhi shifted attention away from India’s technological ambitions to political controversy. The incident, followed by strong police action, generated avoidable negative publicity at an international forum.
⸻
Body
Youth Congress members disrupted the summit to protest government policies, raising slogans inside the venue. While dissent is a democratic right, staging a protest at a global platform meant to showcase India’s AI leadership was widely criticised as inappropriate.
The police responded with arrests and detentions, which in turn triggered allegations of excessive or improper action. The situation escalated into a political confrontation, overshadowing the summit’s objectives and raising concerns about coordination, proportionality, and respect for civil liberties.
The episode reflects two concerns:
• Misuse of international platforms for domestic political messaging.
• The need for measured, lawful police response that upholds democratic freedoms.
⸻
Conclusion
The controversy resulted in reputational costs for all sides. Political protests must be responsibly timed and located, especially during events of international significance. At the same time, law enforcement must act with restraint and strict adherence to procedure. Protecting both democratic expression and India’s global image requires maturity from political actors and institutions alike.
👍1