In October 2019, Adolph sued Uber in superior court, alleging individual and class claims for relief under Labor Code section 2802 and the UCL.

This case concerns a question of standing under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA). Details on the Uber Lawsuit

Uber gets taken to court by Erik Adolph

First, Uber contends that unless Adolph’s non-individual claims are dismissed, his PAGA action will run afoul of Viking River

Uber makes several arguments in urging that a PAGA plaintiff loses standing to litigate non-individual claims in court

Five recent Court of Appeal opinions have reached the same conclusion. This unanimity is unsurprising because our reading of PAGA’s standing requirements...

Next, Uber contends that a PAGA plaintiff must have a “financial stake in the outcome of the case”

Uber also argues that PAGA contains a third standing requirement — the action must “be . . . brought by an aggrieved employee on behalf of himself or herself

Rahul Chaturvedi is a Staff Software Engineer at Uber Technologies Inc. He has been at the forefront of optimizing one of the world's largest Kafka deployments.

The Lean Startup approach discoursed by Eric Ries, has popularized the ‘fail fast, iterate often’ notion.