Forwarded from Total Disclosure (NEW)
I ''wonder'' why it is so hard for El Elyon Musk to get rid of the bots, porn, OF prostitutes, and crypto scammers who are on X by the dozens of thousands.
Ah, that's right. The dude loves porn, prostitutes, and crypto scammers!
Ah, that's right. The dude loves porn, prostitutes, and crypto scammers!
Forwarded from The Way Forward (Alec Zeck)
Important Epistemological, Scientific, Philosophical, and Legal Questions:
Before claiming that X causes Y, is it necessary to first establish that X exists?
If X is related to a scientific claim, by what standard is X confirmed to exist and to cause Y?
And after first proving that X even exists in the first place — which is the essential first step, is it not also essential to clearly demonstrate that X actually causes Y?
If a government enacts laws, codes, acts, or statutes around X and then coerces or threatens individuals into compliance based on what X allegedly does, must it first demonstrate that X exists?
If health experts recommend — or even mandate —treatments, medications, or injections based on the alleged effects of X, is it necessary to first prove that X exists?
If X has not been confirmed to exist or to cause Y according to that standard alluded to above, is it not imperative to question and challenge its legitimacy?
Does it matter that “the overwhelming majority of experts believe that X exists and causes Y” if X has not been confirmed to exist or to cause Y according to that standard?
If no one has formulated a 100% perfect explanation for what does cause Y, does that have any bearing on the fact that X has not been proven to exist or to cause Y?
Does it make sense to accept the foundational assumption that X exists and causes Y, despite failing to validate that claim according to the established standard, and then focus only on scrutinizing the additional claims built upon that unproven assumption?
Does it matter that, because the overwhelming majority of people have been conditioned to believe that X exists and causes Y, anyone who highlights the lack of evidence for X’s existence and causal link to Y may be perceived as “crazy” by the majority?
Before claiming that X causes Y, is it necessary to first establish that X exists?
If X is related to a scientific claim, by what standard is X confirmed to exist and to cause Y?
And after first proving that X even exists in the first place — which is the essential first step, is it not also essential to clearly demonstrate that X actually causes Y?
If a government enacts laws, codes, acts, or statutes around X and then coerces or threatens individuals into compliance based on what X allegedly does, must it first demonstrate that X exists?
If health experts recommend — or even mandate —treatments, medications, or injections based on the alleged effects of X, is it necessary to first prove that X exists?
If X has not been confirmed to exist or to cause Y according to that standard alluded to above, is it not imperative to question and challenge its legitimacy?
Does it matter that “the overwhelming majority of experts believe that X exists and causes Y” if X has not been confirmed to exist or to cause Y according to that standard?
If no one has formulated a 100% perfect explanation for what does cause Y, does that have any bearing on the fact that X has not been proven to exist or to cause Y?
Does it make sense to accept the foundational assumption that X exists and causes Y, despite failing to validate that claim according to the established standard, and then focus only on scrutinizing the additional claims built upon that unproven assumption?
Does it matter that, because the overwhelming majority of people have been conditioned to believe that X exists and causes Y, anyone who highlights the lack of evidence for X’s existence and causal link to Y may be perceived as “crazy” by the majority?
Hey guys I went in the Josh Button podcast yesterday sharing my journey with his audience. It was a great talk for a little over an hour!
Also happy 1 year anny to Project Whistleblower. Praise God for keeping me alive and for everyone who has had me on their platform this year to do a media blitz to share this unique whistleblower story with the world.
Check out the documentary testimony at justintegrity.net if you haven’t seen it yet!
Check out the documentary testimony at justintegrity.net if you haven’t seen it yet!
https://beyondterrain.com/the-microbiology-deception/
Great read on my friend Liev’s blog post. Awesome stuff removing the layers of conditioning around microbiology, and creating a foundation of truth around pleomorphism.
Great read on my friend Liev’s blog post. Awesome stuff removing the layers of conditioning around microbiology, and creating a foundation of truth around pleomorphism.
Beyond Terrain
The Microbiology Deception
A critical look at microbiology’s flawed foundations—exploring pleomorphism, and the terrain-based role of microbes in health.
https://rumble.com/v6riyl5-e4-virology-science-or-scientism-an-overview-of-logical-fallacies.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
For anyone looking to venture into the logical fallacies regarding virology, here’s a conversation I had with ChatGPT that dumbs down about 30 logical fallacies. I also venture into the epistemology of why virology is fraudulent. Please share and send to those who might not fully get it. I think this might help :) ✌️☮️💙
For anyone looking to venture into the logical fallacies regarding virology, here’s a conversation I had with ChatGPT that dumbs down about 30 logical fallacies. I also venture into the epistemology of why virology is fraudulent. Please share and send to those who might not fully get it. I think this might help :) ✌️☮️💙
Rumble
E4: Virology: Science or Scientism?- An overview of Logical Fallacies
Is virology truly a science, or is it built on inference, assumption, and institutional authority rather than direct empirical proof? In this episode, we break down why virology fails under epistemolo
Forwarded from ViroLIEgy
Dr. Mark Bailey’s “A Farewell to Virology” is a masterful takedown of “Covid-19” & virology. First a free essay, then a powerful 3-part documentary—now available in a beautiful hardcover including “Virology’s Event Horizon” & “Virus, Bacteriophage and Single ‘Virus’ Genomics.”
If you’d like to support the Baileys’ work, consider buying a copy for yourself—or for someone who needs to understand the depth of the virology fraud.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Please see this for my take on Mark's amazing work, with links to the documentary and his other brilliant piece, "The COVID-19 Fraud & War on Humanity."
https://viroliegy.com/2022/09/16/dr-mark-bailey-bids-farewell-to-virology/
If you’d like to support the Baileys’ work, consider buying a copy for yourself—or for someone who needs to understand the depth of the virology fraud.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Please see this for my take on Mark's amazing work, with links to the documentary and his other brilliant piece, "The COVID-19 Fraud & War on Humanity."
https://viroliegy.com/2022/09/16/dr-mark-bailey-bids-farewell-to-virology/
Hey all, check out this video of me recording the serving of lawsuits for crime against humanity for the Covid-19 fraud scamdemic to MSNBC. Please retweet, like, share if you can as I’m extremely censored and would love to force the big players like infowars, daily wire and Fox, to cover this as it’s unlikely the mainstream media will rattle on themselves. I’ll be bringing testimony for the vaxx injured and bringing up virology fraud to get it in the record as someone who worked directly on the COVID-19 poison injection. Sharing also keeps more people finding out about it, which essentially keeps me alive.
Stay tuned, there’s about a dozen more of these servings coming out, just have to edit the videos.
https://x.com/justintegrity_/status/1909701683401125980?s=46&t=uV0zcJqVFlRJYuHKtxDX_g
https://x.com/unjected/status/1909689448583119141?s=46&t=uV0zcJqVFlRJYuHKtxDX_g
Stay tuned, there’s about a dozen more of these servings coming out, just have to edit the videos.
https://x.com/justintegrity_/status/1909701683401125980?s=46&t=uV0zcJqVFlRJYuHKtxDX_g
https://x.com/unjected/status/1909689448583119141?s=46&t=uV0zcJqVFlRJYuHKtxDX_g
X (formerly Twitter)
Unjected Official (@unjected) on X
MSNBC you've been SERVED!
Maybe you shouldn't have pushed 💉and defamed the unvaccinated population 👊🏼
Huge shoutout to Justin @justintegrity_ who is a Pfizer whistleblower and plaintiff on Team Humanity. If you haven't seen his documentary about his time…
Maybe you shouldn't have pushed 💉and defamed the unvaccinated population 👊🏼
Huge shoutout to Justin @justintegrity_ who is a Pfizer whistleblower and plaintiff on Team Humanity. If you haven't seen his documentary about his time…
Forwarded from YumNaturals Emporium Amandha Vollmer
Well, it's done! This was an incredible amount of work (being that I ended up writing it 3 times), but now you have something to share with people who are taking Methylene Blue so they can understand the risks.
My reference list has 90 citations, so that can give you an idea of it's size. Please share widely.
https://open.substack.com/pub/amandhavollmer/p/methylene-blue-colour-me-concerned
With care,
ADV 🩵
#methyleneblue #dangers #MBrisks
My reference list has 90 citations, so that can give you an idea of it's size. Please share widely.
https://open.substack.com/pub/amandhavollmer/p/methylene-blue-colour-me-concerned
With care,
ADV 🩵
#methyleneblue #dangers #MBrisks
Substack
Methylene Blue: Colour Me Concerned
A critical analysis of its pharmacology, risks, and incompatibility with holistic methods.