Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you don't understand that #PubpeerGate is a RICO operation to silence doctors and scientists and enable government agents to commit felonies, let Grok guide you through the crimes involved.
Sound on.
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1910891327178629161
Sound on.
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1910891327178629161
There are a few things going on here. First, the misunderstanding of what #BlueOrigin claimed which was only that they shot a phallus-shaped object 100km on a parabolic trajectory into space and the tip came off and landed in a desert defying the laws of physics. That tip (capsule) was undefiled by dust or scorch marks or friction so presumably was exposed to stratospheric lube. The capsule would have reached a theoretical 4000kmh in a vacuum or 1000kmh terminal velocity. Either way hundreds of GJ of kinetic energy must be dissipated. That is not possible with a parachute the size of a large pair of knickers.
Then there is the #Dragon capsule re-entry claim which is that a capsule of a similar size and shape (5,000kg) landed back on earth from an orbital trajectory, a similar trajectory that a meteorite takes. Meteorites burn up in that path despite being made of rock which is basically what the purported "ceramic tile" heat shields are made of, which superseded the "ablative" heat shields of Apollo (which were presumably not fit for purpose). Still, meteorites are obliterated at that speed and contact with the atmosphere. Yet the orbital speed capsules just happily land in the sea at a set point (ignoring all the confounders from wind resistance, parabolic paths etc and with no video evidence to support the idea that they actually came in on an orbital path).
So yes, the orbital path produces much more heat but perpendicular re-entry from the Karman line is no mean feat and produces explosive of kinetic energy. In summary, both stories are fake. If you think they are not please provide the video feed of the full descent as taken by the video cameras in the capsules and video cameras that should have been attached to the outside of the capsules considering they are so heat resistant.
Does that help?
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1913041922366804116
Then there is the #Dragon capsule re-entry claim which is that a capsule of a similar size and shape (5,000kg) landed back on earth from an orbital trajectory, a similar trajectory that a meteorite takes. Meteorites burn up in that path despite being made of rock which is basically what the purported "ceramic tile" heat shields are made of, which superseded the "ablative" heat shields of Apollo (which were presumably not fit for purpose). Still, meteorites are obliterated at that speed and contact with the atmosphere. Yet the orbital speed capsules just happily land in the sea at a set point (ignoring all the confounders from wind resistance, parabolic paths etc and with no video evidence to support the idea that they actually came in on an orbital path).
So yes, the orbital path produces much more heat but perpendicular re-entry from the Karman line is no mean feat and produces explosive of kinetic energy. In summary, both stories are fake. If you think they are not please provide the video feed of the full descent as taken by the video cameras in the capsules and video cameras that should have been attached to the outside of the capsules considering they are so heat resistant.
Does that help?
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1913041922366804116
X (formerly Twitter)
Jikkyleaks 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) on X
@skeletors_fist @amuse @Andercot @grok There are a few things going on here. First, the misunderstanding of what #BlueOrigin claimed which was only that they shot a phallus-shaped object 100km on a parabolic trajectory into space and the tip came off and…