Imagine a solution to the Gaza problem that gave Gazans twice the land they currently have, with fertile coastal soil, in exchange for the return of illegally occupied territory held by Turkey since 1974. #GazPrus

Oh dear it seems from the previous downvoted post so few people like the idea. Feedback here!
https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1921863346577367160

https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1923969368234524922

BUSTED!

Pharma's links to the community notes abuse scandal.

Enterprising Desert Raven whose identity was known was linked back to UDG healthcare.

UDG healthcare forgot to remove their web redirection which points to Inizio.

Inizio - a pharma PR company - was identified as the recruiter of pubpeer operatives in #Pubpeergate because Sholto David forgot to cover his tracks.

Check yourself here:
http://udghealthcare.com

Archived:
https://archive.is/YPH98

Ooh that ring. Very similar to Buzz Aldrin's ring. How convenient.

https://fxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1926089700449645042

https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1926133254035316952

Jeffrey Epstein.
George Church.
Jennifer Doudna.
James Randi.
Harvard.
Peter Singer.
Brigham & Women's.
Broad institute.

One thing in common.
They think they can make "better humans" in their own image.
The rest of us call it eugenics.
https://www.arkmedic.info/p/the-new-eugenics-movement-part-2

https://vxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1926445955659767985
🚨The miscarriage rate confusion:

I will explain why the "82%" or "81%" miscarriage figure is false and was allowed to poison the well.

The true story is that the miscarriage rate after COVID vaccination was seen to be about double the natural rate. Poisoning the well allowed the "factcheckers" to debunk the false story thereby suppressing the real story.

1️⃣The first "82%" figure was 104/127 representing 104 reported miscarriages from a falsely interpreted denominator of 127 from the NEJM Shimabukuro paper in 2021. There were actually 1132 vaccinations in first trimester pregnancies in that cohort, so the 82% figure was wildly wrong.
Full explanation here➡️ https://arkmedic.info/p/the-curious-case-of-the-miscalculated

2️⃣The second "81%" figure was 26/32 and was misinterpreted from the Pfizer post-marketing surveillance document 5.3.6. In table 6 there were 270 adverse events (VAERS-type reports) made related to pregnancy, and of these only 32 had a known outcome and 26 were fetal loss. However the correct denominator in this case were the many thousands of pregnancies that did not make an adverse event report, so this number is completely misrepresenting the miscarriage rate. It would be accurate to say "of the 32 adverse event reports made related to pregnancy where the pregnancy outcome was known 26 were fetal losses" but this is not a miscarriage rate. It's a "how many pregnancy adverse events that are reported are actually miscarriages" rate. Nobody should quote that as a miscarriage rate.
Report here➡️
https://archive.org/details/cumulative-analysis-of-post-authorization-adverse-event-reports-of-pf-07302048-bnt162b2/page/20/mode/2up

3️⃣Finally the second "81%" figure has also been touted around as having been deduced from the Pfizer vaccine trial (C4591001) where over a hundred women became pregnant whilst on trial. This again is a false interpretation and in fact in those known and followed up cases there were 17 miscarriages from 144 pregnancies (12%). Table attached.
Full explanation here➡️
https://arkmedic.info/p/the-miscarriage-of-medicine

In all the reports you see where the miscarriage rate following COVID vaccination is over 50% it is because the denominator is wrong. It is usually misinterpreted from a number of adverse event reports that were miscarriages, of all adverse event reports in pregnancy. That can easily approach 100%. For instance if you gave 1000 women in pregnancy a drug and 2 had a miscarriage and there were no other pregnancy events, your "miscarriages out of adverse events" rate would be 100% - whilst your actual miscarriage rate would be only 0.2%.

The V-safe publications were, in my view, intentionally confusing to create this very problem and to hide the real miscarriage rate.

In general, if a story is "too good/bad to be true" it probably is. Please use discernment.
Hope this helps.

#placentagate #NEJMGate #VsafeGate

#Ginogate is kicking off
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1927564476896649465

Let me spell this out:
#Ginogate is about Harvard university being the epicenter of the world's eugenics programmes masquerading as "gene therapy for the common good".

Funded by Jeffrey Epstein with CIA/DARPA money.
There.
Said it.

Ariely, known to have a history of research fraud, self declaring here that he was working for the "Israeli government" during COVID.

Nudgestock. The psychology of nudging you into doing what the government and pharma corporations want.

Protected?
#Ginogate

https://fxtwitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1927568707007467715