#Analysis #ChingCheong
Will CCP truthfully accept international community inspection?
We can explore the issue from three perspectives.
It was just a show
//Dr Bruce Aylward slipped of his tongue that they had not visited the dirty district of Wuhan. (note 1) Therefore, the WHO group and their so-called report was a mere formality.
WHO’s report was written to fit CCP’s notion
//did not allow mentioning anything about the possibility of second wave of outbreak... the report did not point out CCP covered up the outbreak of the epidemics and suppressed people who disclosed the truth of the reality.
//this was not a negligence but a deliberate avoidance of Wuhan in order not to embarrass PRC.
CCP wants to make use of the authority of WHO and the report from the investigation team to legitimise their own official notion about the epidemics
1. The covid-19 is a ‘natural’ product and not ‘artificially synthesised’
//The report did not mention a word about the suspicious concerns relating to P4 lab at Wuhan from the international community and the role of the lab in this incident.
2. The virus is not mutated
//It is important as to whether there is any mutation of the virus because it implies whether somebody is developing biological weapons.
//The problem is that the strains were provided by CCP and therefore totally controlled by whatever CCP wanted to provide.
3. WHO helps to sell CCP propaganda of “China experience” in ‘combating’ the pandemics
//they do not only ruin their own reputation, they have become an accomplice of the pandemics.
Full translation:
https://telegra.ph/Will-CCP-truthfully-accept-international-community-inspection-04-04
Excerpt: HKCNews, (4-Mar, updated on 4-Apr)
https://bit.ly/2V0hlLU
#WHO #ChinesePropaganda #CCP #VirusOrigin #BruceAylward #Censorship #SharpPower #Wuhan
Will CCP truthfully accept international community inspection?
We can explore the issue from three perspectives.
It was just a show
//Dr Bruce Aylward slipped of his tongue that they had not visited the dirty district of Wuhan. (note 1) Therefore, the WHO group and their so-called report was a mere formality.
WHO’s report was written to fit CCP’s notion
//did not allow mentioning anything about the possibility of second wave of outbreak... the report did not point out CCP covered up the outbreak of the epidemics and suppressed people who disclosed the truth of the reality.
//this was not a negligence but a deliberate avoidance of Wuhan in order not to embarrass PRC.
CCP wants to make use of the authority of WHO and the report from the investigation team to legitimise their own official notion about the epidemics
1. The covid-19 is a ‘natural’ product and not ‘artificially synthesised’
//The report did not mention a word about the suspicious concerns relating to P4 lab at Wuhan from the international community and the role of the lab in this incident.
2. The virus is not mutated
//It is important as to whether there is any mutation of the virus because it implies whether somebody is developing biological weapons.
//The problem is that the strains were provided by CCP and therefore totally controlled by whatever CCP wanted to provide.
3. WHO helps to sell CCP propaganda of “China experience” in ‘combating’ the pandemics
//they do not only ruin their own reputation, they have become an accomplice of the pandemics.
Full translation:
https://telegra.ph/Will-CCP-truthfully-accept-international-community-inspection-04-04
Excerpt: HKCNews, (4-Mar, updated on 4-Apr)
https://bit.ly/2V0hlLU
#WHO #ChinesePropaganda #CCP #VirusOrigin #BruceAylward #Censorship #SharpPower #Wuhan
Telegraph
Will CCP truthfully accept international community inspection?
We can explore the issue from three perspectives. It was just a show In the beginning, the itinerary WHO agreed with CCP did not include Wuhan - the most affected city. They eventually allowed a few people to go in Wuhan upon WHO’s insistence. The investigation…
#Newspaper
MPs vote to summon key WHO adviser after global body refuses to let him testify
//A parliamentary committee has voted to employ a rarely used power to summon key WHO adviser Bruce Aylward after te global body declined to allow him to testify...on how it responded to the COVID-19 pandemic
//The WHO is facing questions about its relationship with China and whether the organization properly notified and prepared the world for the coronavirus the causes COVID-19
//In late January, even after Chinese authorities locked down Wuhan...Director-General (of WHO) urged countries not to limit travel
//The organization has refused to denounce China for concealing information about COVID-19
//According to WHO lawyer Derek Walton, “As an intergovernmental organization vested with certain immunities and in order to protect its impartiality and objectivity, WHO or its officials do not normally participate in hearings held by parliamentary bodies.”
//Dr. Aylward...has praised China’s response to COVID-19 and declined to answer questions about Taiwan’s exclusion (in WHO) when interviewed by a Hong Kong reporter in March
Full article: The Globe and Mail, (30-Apr)
https://tgam.ca/2Sq9dUb
#coronavirus #WHO #BruceAylward #Canada #China
MPs vote to summon key WHO adviser after global body refuses to let him testify
//A parliamentary committee has voted to employ a rarely used power to summon key WHO adviser Bruce Aylward after te global body declined to allow him to testify...on how it responded to the COVID-19 pandemic
//The WHO is facing questions about its relationship with China and whether the organization properly notified and prepared the world for the coronavirus the causes COVID-19
//In late January, even after Chinese authorities locked down Wuhan...Director-General (of WHO) urged countries not to limit travel
//The organization has refused to denounce China for concealing information about COVID-19
//According to WHO lawyer Derek Walton, “As an intergovernmental organization vested with certain immunities and in order to protect its impartiality and objectivity, WHO or its officials do not normally participate in hearings held by parliamentary bodies.”
//Dr. Aylward...has praised China’s response to COVID-19 and declined to answer questions about Taiwan’s exclusion (in WHO) when interviewed by a Hong Kong reporter in March
Full article: The Globe and Mail, (30-Apr)
https://tgam.ca/2Sq9dUb
#coronavirus #WHO #BruceAylward #Canada #China
The Globe and Mail
MPs vote to summon key WHO adviser after global body refuses to let him testify
Under the terms of the motion, the summons will be issued once the committee learns that Dr. Aylward, a Canadian working out of Geneva for the WHO, is back on Canadian soil
#Smearing #Harrassement
HK Journalist Leaves Post After Being Attacked by Pro-China Group for Filming Documentary on Xinjiang’s 'Education Camp'
A number of RTHK programs and journalists in Hong Kong have been repeatedly attacked by pro-China groups.
Among them is Yvonne Tong Yeuk-wun who hosts the English-language radio program "The Pulse" .
During her interview with #BruceAylward, the assistant director general of the #WHO in 2020, Tong raised a question of whether the management of WHO would reconsider the membership status of Taiwan.
Since then, she has been repeatedly targeted by pro-China activists. The #AppleDaily reporters have received information from sources at RTHK saying that Tong is suspected to have resigned from the ongoing pressure and will leave within this week.
A pro-China group went to RTHK earlier this month, accusing Tong of "using public money" to produce "anti-China fake news" by claiming that over a million people are being imprisoned in Xinjiang.
They demanded the station to have her fired. This is not the first time that pro-China groups have come to RTHK to protest against Tong.
Since the end of March in 2020, Tong was accused of violating the "#One China" policy by pro-China groups and even by The Commerce and Economic Development Bureau
after interviewing the WHO representative on "whether Taiwan's membership would be reconsidered".
Amen Ng Man-yee, the former head of Corporate Communications & Standards at RTHK, responded that Tong was carrying her job as a journalist and asked the question in a very matter-of-fact manner without any special meaning.
Source: Apple Daily #April12
https://bit.ly/3g311G9
#Journalist #FreedomOfSpeech #XinjiangCamp #BlueRibboners #ProChina
HK Journalist Leaves Post After Being Attacked by Pro-China Group for Filming Documentary on Xinjiang’s 'Education Camp'
A number of RTHK programs and journalists in Hong Kong have been repeatedly attacked by pro-China groups.
Among them is Yvonne Tong Yeuk-wun who hosts the English-language radio program "The Pulse" .
During her interview with #BruceAylward, the assistant director general of the #WHO in 2020, Tong raised a question of whether the management of WHO would reconsider the membership status of Taiwan.
Since then, she has been repeatedly targeted by pro-China activists. The #AppleDaily reporters have received information from sources at RTHK saying that Tong is suspected to have resigned from the ongoing pressure and will leave within this week.
A pro-China group went to RTHK earlier this month, accusing Tong of "using public money" to produce "anti-China fake news" by claiming that over a million people are being imprisoned in Xinjiang.
They demanded the station to have her fired. This is not the first time that pro-China groups have come to RTHK to protest against Tong.
Since the end of March in 2020, Tong was accused of violating the "#One China" policy by pro-China groups and even by The Commerce and Economic Development Bureau
after interviewing the WHO representative on "whether Taiwan's membership would be reconsidered".
Amen Ng Man-yee, the former head of Corporate Communications & Standards at RTHK, responded that Tong was carrying her job as a journalist and asked the question in a very matter-of-fact manner without any special meaning.
Source: Apple Daily #April12
https://bit.ly/3g311G9
#Journalist #FreedomOfSpeech #XinjiangCamp #BlueRibboners #ProChina