#EditorialColumn #WHO #OneChinaPolicy #Apr21
WHO's One China Policy or No China Policy?
"If U.S. President Trump is politicizing the coronavirus, then Director-general of the World Trade Organization (WHO) Tedros Adhanom is putting the blame on racism for the mass number of coronavirus deaths caused by his misdirection...
Here comes the paradox: If Tedros is a follower of the 'one China' policy upheld by the WHO...does it mean that the Chinese government was behind it? Along the same line, should Tedros better lodge a complaint to the PRC's Foreign Ministry instead of directing it to Taiwan government and Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen?"
Image: Cobaindali
Continue Reading
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/19683
WHO's One China Policy or No China Policy?
"If U.S. President Trump is politicizing the coronavirus, then Director-general of the World Trade Organization (WHO) Tedros Adhanom is putting the blame on racism for the mass number of coronavirus deaths caused by his misdirection...
Here comes the paradox: If Tedros is a follower of the 'one China' policy upheld by the WHO...does it mean that the Chinese government was behind it? Along the same line, should Tedros better lodge a complaint to the PRC's Foreign Ministry instead of directing it to Taiwan government and Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen?"
Image: Cobaindali
Continue Reading
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/19683
#EditorialColumn #WHO #OneChinaPolicy #Apr21
WHO's One China Policy or No China Policy?
If U.S. President Trump is politicizing the coronavirus, then Director-general of the World Trade Organization (WHO) Tedros Adhanom is putting the blame on racism for the mass number of coronavirus deaths caused by his misdirection.
By now, countries around the world have felt the consequences after the WHO had ignored the warning sent from Hong Kong and Taiwan in December 2019. When Trump criticizes China for covering up the coronavirus crisis, according to Trump's rhetoric and style it might be more accurate to call it a 'stereotype' rather than 'racism' as China has insisted. However, Tedros' accusation of Taiwan for its 'racist' attack seemed more of a distraction to sway people from his scientific failures and administrative misconducts.
In the case of Taiwan, Yvon Pierre Loufoua, a crosstalker performer of Congolese descent living in Taiwan, spoke from his life experience that the name-calling acts described by Tedros sounded unreal to Taiwan society and culture. Yvon also saw "China's fear of Taiwan's growing international power" through Tedros' agenda to suppress Taiwan in the game of global politics by marginalizing his own ethnicity and identity.
After all, over the past few months, Tedros has demonstrated what scientific positivism is: Even when experts from Hong Kong and Taiwan ceaselessly suggested ways to stop the epidemic, Tedros insisted that no countries should close their borders with China. Moreover, it was not until March that the WHO finally called the Wuhan pneumonia a pandemic and began considering Europe as the hardest hit area outside of China. Maybe Tedros simply attaches great importance to what he considers as empirical data, as he was only willing to react after a large number of coronavirus patients died outside China.
By inference, Tedros must have had evidence to support his claims of Taiwan attacking him with racist comments and death threats--although Tedros has yet to make any details public.
Let us hope that this health expert from the WHO knows about information and cyber security---especially when some 'great and powerful' nation has perhaps been supplying intelligence analysis.
At this point, we should always remind ourselves that we live in an era of information warfare, where there are Chinese reporters posing as Hong Kong and Taiwanese reporters and asking questions at White House press conferences.
Finally, here comes the paradox: If Tedros is a follower of the 'one China' policy upheld by the WHO, he would have handled the matter like his colleague did: WHO advisor Dr. Bruce Aylward rejected Radio Television Hong Kong's (RTHK) question on Taiwan by hanging up the phone during an interview--he demonstrated how Taiwan should not even be brought up outside the China framework according to this logic. Hypothetically, if Tedros was really attacked by Taiwan, by the same policy does it mean that the Chinese government was behind it? Along the same line, should Tedros better lodge a complaint to the PRC's Foreign Ministry instead of directing it to the Taiwan government and Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen?
#Taiwan #PRC #NoChinaPolicy #Racism #Tedros
Image: https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/19681
WHO's One China Policy or No China Policy?
If U.S. President Trump is politicizing the coronavirus, then Director-general of the World Trade Organization (WHO) Tedros Adhanom is putting the blame on racism for the mass number of coronavirus deaths caused by his misdirection.
By now, countries around the world have felt the consequences after the WHO had ignored the warning sent from Hong Kong and Taiwan in December 2019. When Trump criticizes China for covering up the coronavirus crisis, according to Trump's rhetoric and style it might be more accurate to call it a 'stereotype' rather than 'racism' as China has insisted. However, Tedros' accusation of Taiwan for its 'racist' attack seemed more of a distraction to sway people from his scientific failures and administrative misconducts.
In the case of Taiwan, Yvon Pierre Loufoua, a crosstalker performer of Congolese descent living in Taiwan, spoke from his life experience that the name-calling acts described by Tedros sounded unreal to Taiwan society and culture. Yvon also saw "China's fear of Taiwan's growing international power" through Tedros' agenda to suppress Taiwan in the game of global politics by marginalizing his own ethnicity and identity.
After all, over the past few months, Tedros has demonstrated what scientific positivism is: Even when experts from Hong Kong and Taiwan ceaselessly suggested ways to stop the epidemic, Tedros insisted that no countries should close their borders with China. Moreover, it was not until March that the WHO finally called the Wuhan pneumonia a pandemic and began considering Europe as the hardest hit area outside of China. Maybe Tedros simply attaches great importance to what he considers as empirical data, as he was only willing to react after a large number of coronavirus patients died outside China.
By inference, Tedros must have had evidence to support his claims of Taiwan attacking him with racist comments and death threats--although Tedros has yet to make any details public.
Let us hope that this health expert from the WHO knows about information and cyber security---especially when some 'great and powerful' nation has perhaps been supplying intelligence analysis.
At this point, we should always remind ourselves that we live in an era of information warfare, where there are Chinese reporters posing as Hong Kong and Taiwanese reporters and asking questions at White House press conferences.
Finally, here comes the paradox: If Tedros is a follower of the 'one China' policy upheld by the WHO, he would have handled the matter like his colleague did: WHO advisor Dr. Bruce Aylward rejected Radio Television Hong Kong's (RTHK) question on Taiwan by hanging up the phone during an interview--he demonstrated how Taiwan should not even be brought up outside the China framework according to this logic. Hypothetically, if Tedros was really attacked by Taiwan, by the same policy does it mean that the Chinese government was behind it? Along the same line, should Tedros better lodge a complaint to the PRC's Foreign Ministry instead of directing it to the Taiwan government and Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen?
#Taiwan #PRC #NoChinaPolicy #Racism #Tedros
Image: https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/19681
Telegram
📡Guardians of Hong Kong
Illustration by Taiwanese artist MOGA
Translation by BeWaterHk
Source:
https://www.facebook.com/momogaga0/photos/a.1551617288406144/2625079121059950/?type=3
Translation by BeWaterHk
Source:
https://www.facebook.com/momogaga0/photos/a.1551617288406144/2625079121059950/?type=3
#TaiwanPassport #CCPCensorship
Chinese Media Censors "Republic of China" on New Taiwan Passport
When reporting the news about Taiwan's new passport design, a Chinese media, GuanCha, on Sept 2, 2020 pixelated the Chinese words "REPUBLIC OF CHINA" and the Taiwan's national emblem on the new cover, with only the English words "TAIWAN" and "PASSPORT" shown.
Such way of reporting has given rise to heated debate among netizens in both Taiwan and China.
Source: The Liberty Times #Sept4
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3280184
#GuanCha #Censorship
#OneChinaPolicy #ROC #CCPIdeology
====
#Taiwan Releases New Version of #Passport, Emphasizing Differentiation from China
https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/24882
Chinese Media Censors "Republic of China" on New Taiwan Passport
When reporting the news about Taiwan's new passport design, a Chinese media, GuanCha, on Sept 2, 2020 pixelated the Chinese words "REPUBLIC OF CHINA" and the Taiwan's national emblem on the new cover, with only the English words "TAIWAN" and "PASSPORT" shown.
Such way of reporting has given rise to heated debate among netizens in both Taiwan and China.
Source: The Liberty Times #Sept4
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3280184
#GuanCha #Censorship
#OneChinaPolicy #ROC #CCPIdeology
====
#Taiwan Releases New Version of #Passport, Emphasizing Differentiation from China
https://t.me/guardiansofhongkong/24882
US Senators Push Bill to Counter CCP’s Military Threat to Taiwan as House Representatives Call for Ending ‘One China’ Policy
As the situation becomes increasingly tense in the Taiwan Strait, a number of US senators called on the administration to help Taiwan fend off China on 17 September’s Foreign Affairs Committee hearing. A number of senators and House representatives has made similar calls for the US to take actions and asked that the ‘One China’ policy be ended. As senator Rick Scott proposed the Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act, House representative Tom Tiffany proposed that America resume diplomatic relations with Taiwan and open negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement.
In a tweet, Scott, senator for Florida, said, “For months, I’ve called on Communist China to...live up to its commitment to respect Hong Kong’s autonomy and end its efforts to crack down on Taiwan.” He described the Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act as demonstrating America’s commitment to democracy and freedom as well as Taiwan. The act deals with strengthening America’s Taiwan policy and increasing Taiwan’s ability to resist China. It also provides for limited authorization for the president to use force to protect Taiwan from military attack under specific circumstances. Additionally, it provides for a platform that facilitates military exercises involving the US and Taiwan and requires planning for coordinated military actions in case Taiwan is attacked. It further urges the US trade representative to enter into negotiations with Taiwan on a bilateral trade agreement, and to welcome the Taiwanese president to address a joint session of the US congress.
Source: Stand News #Sep19
#US #Taiwan #China #RickScott #TomTiffany #OneChinaPolicy #TaiwanInvasionPreventionAct #Diplomacy
https://bit.ly/2RWG2rd
As the situation becomes increasingly tense in the Taiwan Strait, a number of US senators called on the administration to help Taiwan fend off China on 17 September’s Foreign Affairs Committee hearing. A number of senators and House representatives has made similar calls for the US to take actions and asked that the ‘One China’ policy be ended. As senator Rick Scott proposed the Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act, House representative Tom Tiffany proposed that America resume diplomatic relations with Taiwan and open negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement.
In a tweet, Scott, senator for Florida, said, “For months, I’ve called on Communist China to...live up to its commitment to respect Hong Kong’s autonomy and end its efforts to crack down on Taiwan.” He described the Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act as demonstrating America’s commitment to democracy and freedom as well as Taiwan. The act deals with strengthening America’s Taiwan policy and increasing Taiwan’s ability to resist China. It also provides for limited authorization for the president to use force to protect Taiwan from military attack under specific circumstances. Additionally, it provides for a platform that facilitates military exercises involving the US and Taiwan and requires planning for coordinated military actions in case Taiwan is attacked. It further urges the US trade representative to enter into negotiations with Taiwan on a bilateral trade agreement, and to welcome the Taiwanese president to address a joint session of the US congress.
Source: Stand News #Sep19
#US #Taiwan #China #RickScott #TomTiffany #OneChinaPolicy #TaiwanInvasionPreventionAct #Diplomacy
https://bit.ly/2RWG2rd
立場新聞 Stand News
美參議員提《防止台灣被侵略法案》助抗衡中共軍事威脅 眾議員終止「一中政策」 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞
台海局勢越見緊張，美國多名參議員在本周四 (17 日) 在外交事務委員會聽證上表明，美國應協助台灣抗衡中國。亦...
US Representative Puts Forward Resolution to End ‘One China’ Policy, Establish Formal Diplomatic Relations Between America and Taiwan
US Republican representative Tom Tiffany has introduced a concurrent resolution calling for the resumption of formal diplomatic relations between America and Taiwan and ending the ‘one China’ policy.
Introduced on 16 September, the resolution will, if passed, serve as the congress’ call for the US to resume formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, negotiate and sign free trade agreements, and endorse Taiwan’s membership in international organizations. It will also call on the president to move away from the outdated ‘one China’ policy and recognize Taiwan as an independent state, and to endorse Taiwan’s membership in the UN and other international organizations of which the US is a member. A concurrent resolution is a legislation expressing the sentiment of the US congress. Requiring only the approval of both the house and the senate and not the president’s signature, it is not legally binding.
“Now is the time for America to stop parroting Beijing’s ‘One China’ fantasy, and for US policy to reflect the reality that Taiwan is a free, democratic and independent country,” Tiffany stressed, noting that the US does not need the CCP’s permission to engage in dialogue with its friends around the world.
Tiffany said the US and Taiwan had maintained normal diplomatic relations until 1979, when the then-president Jimmy Carter abruptly cut ties with Taiwan and recognized the communist Chinese regime without the congress’ consent. Despite the Taiwan Relations Act, which the congress later passed to authorize US arms sales to Taiwan, and the ‘six assurances’ made by the late president Ronald Reagan, the absence of formal diplomatic relations between the US and Taiwan is tantamount to treating the democratically elected government of Taiwan the same way it treats the brutal regimes in North Korea and Iran.
Source: Apple Daily #Sep18
#US #Taiwan #China #TomTiffany #Congress #OneChinaPolicy #Diplomacy
https://bit.ly/3mQrZSB
US Republican representative Tom Tiffany has introduced a concurrent resolution calling for the resumption of formal diplomatic relations between America and Taiwan and ending the ‘one China’ policy.
Introduced on 16 September, the resolution will, if passed, serve as the congress’ call for the US to resume formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, negotiate and sign free trade agreements, and endorse Taiwan’s membership in international organizations. It will also call on the president to move away from the outdated ‘one China’ policy and recognize Taiwan as an independent state, and to endorse Taiwan’s membership in the UN and other international organizations of which the US is a member. A concurrent resolution is a legislation expressing the sentiment of the US congress. Requiring only the approval of both the house and the senate and not the president’s signature, it is not legally binding.
“Now is the time for America to stop parroting Beijing’s ‘One China’ fantasy, and for US policy to reflect the reality that Taiwan is a free, democratic and independent country,” Tiffany stressed, noting that the US does not need the CCP’s permission to engage in dialogue with its friends around the world.
Tiffany said the US and Taiwan had maintained normal diplomatic relations until 1979, when the then-president Jimmy Carter abruptly cut ties with Taiwan and recognized the communist Chinese regime without the congress’ consent. Despite the Taiwan Relations Act, which the congress later passed to authorize US arms sales to Taiwan, and the ‘six assurances’ made by the late president Ronald Reagan, the absence of formal diplomatic relations between the US and Taiwan is tantamount to treating the democratically elected government of Taiwan the same way it treats the brutal regimes in North Korea and Iran.
Source: Apple Daily #Sep18
#US #Taiwan #China #TomTiffany #Congress #OneChinaPolicy #Diplomacy
https://bit.ly/3mQrZSB
The US Say No Position on Taiwan Sovereignty, but “One-China Policy” is Distinct from “One-China Principle”
In response to press inquiries, the US Department of State spokesperson further elaborates US's stance on Taiwan policy. He pointed out that the US has long followed a “One-China Policy” which is distinct from Beijing's “One-China Principle”. The spokesperson said the China Communist Party (CCP) asserts sovereignty over Taiwan under the “One-China Principle”, but the US takes no position on sovereignty over Taiwan.
The spokesperson added, "the fundamental U.S. interest is that the Taiwan question be resolved peacefully, without coercion, and in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait". In his reply, he emphasize the U.S.' One China policy remains guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, the three Joint Communiques between the U.S. and China, and the Six Assurances to Taiwan by Ronald Reagan, as it has been in the past four decades.
The US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in an interview with Hugh Hewitt Show that the US has prescribed that Taiwan has not been part of China, and that was recognized since the Reagan administration, adhered to now for three and a half decades, and done so under both Democratic and the Republican administrations, in fact, a bipartian consensus. Since Pompeo's speech was questioned as a violation of the “one China principle,” it reportedly triggered strong discontent among hardliners in Beijing.
#Taiwan #US #China #USdepartment #USsecretary #Pompeo #OneChinaPolicy #OneChinaPrinciple #TaiwanRelationsAct #SixAssurancesToTaiwan
Source: Apple Daily #Nov15
https://hk.appledaily.com/international/20201115/GJC2PKBV7NBR5GYTIKO32F4SKE/
In response to press inquiries, the US Department of State spokesperson further elaborates US's stance on Taiwan policy. He pointed out that the US has long followed a “One-China Policy” which is distinct from Beijing's “One-China Principle”. The spokesperson said the China Communist Party (CCP) asserts sovereignty over Taiwan under the “One-China Principle”, but the US takes no position on sovereignty over Taiwan.
The spokesperson added, "the fundamental U.S. interest is that the Taiwan question be resolved peacefully, without coercion, and in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait". In his reply, he emphasize the U.S.' One China policy remains guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, the three Joint Communiques between the U.S. and China, and the Six Assurances to Taiwan by Ronald Reagan, as it has been in the past four decades.
The US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in an interview with Hugh Hewitt Show that the US has prescribed that Taiwan has not been part of China, and that was recognized since the Reagan administration, adhered to now for three and a half decades, and done so under both Democratic and the Republican administrations, in fact, a bipartian consensus. Since Pompeo's speech was questioned as a violation of the “one China principle,” it reportedly triggered strong discontent among hardliners in Beijing.
#Taiwan #US #China #USdepartment #USsecretary #Pompeo #OneChinaPolicy #OneChinaPrinciple #TaiwanRelationsAct #SixAssurancesToTaiwan
Source: Apple Daily #Nov15
https://hk.appledaily.com/international/20201115/GJC2PKBV7NBR5GYTIKO32F4SKE/
#InternationalRelations
HK Authorities Force Taiwan's representatives in Hong Kong to sign “One China Commitment”
The Mainland Affairs Council (#MAC) of Taiwan pointed out that Hong Kong Government requested the Taiwanese staff of Taipei Economic and Cultural Office to sign the “One China Commitment”.
The Taiwanese staff refused, so their visas could not be renewed. 7 staff members had to leave Hong Kong and returned to Taiwan on Jun 20, 2021.
The President of MAC in Taiwan Chiu Tai-san criticized that the “One China Commitment” was a political barrier set up by Hong Kong Government, and it violates the Taiwan-HK agreement made in 2011 “with the aim to belittle the National status of my country, and forced the staff members to bow their heads to the Beijing authorities”.
Taiwan insists on rejecting it. Chiu also stated that #CCP is undoubtedly the “shadow fighter” behind all these operations, by attempting to take advantage of the Taiwan office in Hong Kong as a tool for political conspiracy against Taiwan. Once again, it proves Hong Kong’s “One Country Two Systems” becomes only an empty title.
As a consequent, countries that have signed contracts and negotiated with Hong Kong government "shall put a question mark on the autonomy and integrity of this authority”.
Source: Stand News #Jun22
#OneChinaPolicy #OneCountryTwoSystems
https://www.thestandnews.com/politics/%E9%99%B8%E5%A7%94%E6%9C%83%E6%96%A5%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E9%A7%90%E6%B8%AF%E8%BE%A6%E4%BA%8B%E8%99%95%E4%BA%BA%E5%93%A1%E8%A2%AB%E9%80%BC%E7%B0%BD-%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%AD%E6%89%BF%E8%AB%BE-%E6%89%B9%E8%A9%95%E6%B8%AF%E5%BA%9C%E9%81%95%E6%89%BF%E8%AB%BE-%E7%9F%AE%E5%8C%96%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%9C%8B%E6%A0%BC/
HK Authorities Force Taiwan's representatives in Hong Kong to sign “One China Commitment”
The Mainland Affairs Council (#MAC) of Taiwan pointed out that Hong Kong Government requested the Taiwanese staff of Taipei Economic and Cultural Office to sign the “One China Commitment”.
The Taiwanese staff refused, so their visas could not be renewed. 7 staff members had to leave Hong Kong and returned to Taiwan on Jun 20, 2021.
The President of MAC in Taiwan Chiu Tai-san criticized that the “One China Commitment” was a political barrier set up by Hong Kong Government, and it violates the Taiwan-HK agreement made in 2011 “with the aim to belittle the National status of my country, and forced the staff members to bow their heads to the Beijing authorities”.
Taiwan insists on rejecting it. Chiu also stated that #CCP is undoubtedly the “shadow fighter” behind all these operations, by attempting to take advantage of the Taiwan office in Hong Kong as a tool for political conspiracy against Taiwan. Once again, it proves Hong Kong’s “One Country Two Systems” becomes only an empty title.
As a consequent, countries that have signed contracts and negotiated with Hong Kong government "shall put a question mark on the autonomy and integrity of this authority”.
Source: Stand News #Jun22
#OneChinaPolicy #OneCountryTwoSystems
https://www.thestandnews.com/politics/%E9%99%B8%E5%A7%94%E6%9C%83%E6%96%A5%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E9%A7%90%E6%B8%AF%E8%BE%A6%E4%BA%8B%E8%99%95%E4%BA%BA%E5%93%A1%E8%A2%AB%E9%80%BC%E7%B0%BD-%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%AD%E6%89%BF%E8%AB%BE-%E6%89%B9%E8%A9%95%E6%B8%AF%E5%BA%9C%E9%81%95%E6%89%BF%E8%AB%BE-%E7%9F%AE%E5%8C%96%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%9C%8B%E6%A0%BC/