Neo Nazi larpers will say that Germany had to "rescue the German poles" as a defence to why the Nazis had to engage in warfare. But they conveniently skip over the fact that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia 5-6 months prior. England and France declared war after many warnings of declaration and then the Nazis went an invaded their second nation, Poland. So this whole line about the Nazis rescuing the German Poles is utterly garbage. They killed 5.5M Poles and decimated Warsaw, which shows that it wasn't about rescuing anyone--they were on a mission to blitzkrieg.

(Hitler at Prague Castle)
The military occupation of Czechoslovakia by Nazi Germany began with the German annexation of the Sudetenland in 1938, continued with the creation of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, and by the end of 1944 extended to all parts of Czechoslovakia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Czechoslovakia_(1938%E2%80%931945)

"Hitler and Göring remained deeply sceptical about such attempts to revive what Goring referred to as the ‘ridiculousness’ of ‘Wotan and Thor’ and the ‘Germanic wedding’. The Nazi Education Minister Bernhard Rust inveighed against attempts to propagate ‘Valhalla as a substitute for a Christian heaven’. And on 6 September 1938, Hitler himself weighed in with a speech attacking attempts to turn Nazism into a religion...."
— Richard J Evans, Third Reich in Power.

"This policy of distancing [Himmler] himself set certain limits to attacks on the churches. In September 1934 Himmler issued an SS order ‘strictly’ banning ‘any disturbance or any tactless behaviour during the religious ceremonies of all denominations’. In October 1935 he reassured Hitler, who was evidently concerned about the well-known hostile attitude of the SS to the churches, that ‘he valued highly peaceful relations between state and church’. In July 1937 he noted in an SS order that he had had to expel a Platoon Leader (Scharführer) from the SS for ‘a speech that was riddled with tactless remarks about Church matters’. A month earlier, during a course of ‘ideological indoctrination’, he had banned ‘any attacks on the person of Christ’, since ‘such attacks or the abuse of Christ as a Jew [are] unworthy of us’ and ‘definitely historically untrue’; which showed that he shared the notion of an ‘Aryan Jesus’ that was widespread in völkisch circles. He also declined to attack Christianity publicly as ‘Jewish-Roman’. In 1941 he wrote to a corporal in the Wehrmacht, who wanted to become a theology student, that he was unable to grant his wish ‘to remain a member of the SS as a theologian on principle’. The basic regulation had been passed in order to keep the SS ‘out of the conflicts among the religious denominations’.
The fact that the SS leadership did not demand that its members leave their churches, however much this was considered desirable, fitted in with this public image of neutrality vis-a`-vis the churches. At the end of 1938, 21.9 percent of SS members described themselves, like Himmler, as ‘believers in God’ (gottgläubig); in other words, they did not belong to any Christian denomination. Officially Himmler emphasized that he left it up to his members whether or not they belonged to a Christian denomination. In 1936 he advised the leader of the Düsseldorf Oberabschnitt, Fritz Weitzel, not to ask SS leaders during their indoctrination course to produce essays on the topic of ‘How I Came to Leave the Church’. He considered that ‘dangerous’; instead, he suggested ‘Is Belief in God the Same Thing as Membership of a Religious Denomination?’ In February 1937 he told the Gruppenführer that he was strongly against forcing people to leave the church—it should not be made into a ‘sport’ within the SS.
In 1937 he wrote to a pastor, in reply to a query: ‘Every SS man is free to be a member of a church or not. It is a personal matter, which he has to answer for to God or his conscience.’ SS men should not, however, be atheists, for ‘that is the only world- or religious view that is not tolerated within the SS’. ‘I have nothing to do with denominations,’ he told army officers in July 1944, ‘I leave that to each individual. But I have never tolerated an atheist in the ranks of the SS. Every member has a deep faith in God, in what my ancestors called in their language Waralda, the ancient one, the one who is mightier than we are.’ "
— Peter Longerich, Heinrich Himmler, A life

Marxism/Communism/Leninism should really be the one to be called National Socialism. The Russian system was all about putting your Nation state before yourself.

Germany's version should be called Germanic Socialism or Racial Socialists.

The Transfer Agreement | The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine | 2009 ed. (((Edwin Black)))

“The Transfer Agreement is Edwin Black's compelling, award-winning story of a negotiated rescue in 1933 between Zionist organizations and the Nazis to transfer some 50,000 Jews, and $100 million of their assets, to Jewish Palestine. In the process, the organized worldwide Jewish-led boycott against Hitler was stopped.”

ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ
@AmalekInternationalChatV2
@AmalekInternationalV5

THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT (Channel 5 News | 1984-04-22)

The Transfer Agreement | The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine | 2009 ed. (((Edwin Black)))

ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ ᛏ
@AmalekInternationalChatV2
@AmalekInternationalV5

Before you dismiss the author and his associates for being Jewish, keep in mind that many middle class Jews in Germany at the time were persecuted, uprooted from their homes and placed in work camps. So they have their own reasons/motives for exposing this arrangement. I am in no way trying to garner sympathy for Jews, but just explaining their side of the story and why they would have motivations to against the Zionist elites.
The banking elite has never had any issues scapegoating the middleclass Jews and throwing them under the bus to generate sympathy for Jews as a whole. I would hope that that middle class Jews will see this and realize how the elites have been the ones upheaving their families and having other groups persecute them.
It's extremely complicated to understand the full picture of you haven't researched CJBs work on Hitler. Many people on the far right assume that all Jews are just joyfully holding hands and going about as some sort of cooperative team, but the reality is that they infight all the time, and there's a Jew on each opposite side of every issue. The elites are aligned--but not the middle class Jews and especially not with the elite.
You have to consider the elites a separate entity and group to make sense of the big picture behind Hitler and their global power. There's a very small trillionaire club..and the rest. They couldn't give two shits for the lower classes.

A hypothetical conversation with Hitler (and his slippery sophistry) regarding religion, in the 1930s (this is satire)

Reporter: "So what exactly is your stance on religion for the future of Germany, would you be in favor of: Catholicism, Norse Paganism, Islam? Please explain."

Hitler: "Yes, of course. For the sake of the folk, we must adopt our natural spirituality and essence; an assertion, or a plea with the creator to allow us to be a nation of one.  (Shouting) Nowhere are we condemned for being ourselves as Germans and inheriting our right to the Fatherland! Our ancestors are watching our futures with keen eyes and whole hearts! (waves fist fanatically) Clearly, this as an opportunity for a renaissance before the non-atheists, and of course, those alike."

Reporter: "....ok then, right."

He would speak in and open-ended, vague manner, combined with heavy contradiction and political rhetoric. He was irrational as he was fanatical and word-salady.

“In November 1936 Himmler requested the SS-Gruppenführer not to conduct birth or marriage ceremonies on SS premises or in public, but rather within the family. Any report in the press was to be avoided. The private nature of these ceremonies, as Himmler explained to the Gruppenführer, should prevent any ‘priest’ from turning up and objecting that a ‘heathen marriage’ or ‘something like a church ritual’ was being carried out. There were good reasons for Himmler to be nervous about making the SS cult, which he had expressly designed, all too public. He feared not only ridicule from the public, BUT IN PARTICULAR HITLER’S NEGATIVE ATTITUDE WITH REGARD TO ANY TOO PRONOUNCED REVIVAL OF THE GERMANIC HERITAGE: ‘Rosenberg, Himmler, and Darre´ HAVE TO STOP THIS NONSENSE WITH CULTS’, he had said in 1935, according to Goebbels’s diary.”

— Peter Longerich, Heinrich Himmler, A life

Just a personal note about this channel:
When I started this, it was literally a private channel for myself, to recall sources for online debates on Hitler and random stuff. I was also using it for sharing various content like videos and PDFs.I had absolutely no intentions of making this channel into what it currently is. Initially I was just using this channel to upload random stuff, so that's why if you goto the beginning of the group, it's a mish mash of odd stuff and not entirely focused on Hitler at all.
It wasn't until a few months of debating Hitler online, that I would link a few people to this channel and made it public, but never really promoting it in anyway. Then after a while, the content became more Hitler focused because it basically kept coming up in debates and the channel literally shaped itself by the type of arguments I was initially formulating.
The fact that the channel is nearing 600 members is still rather surprising to me because it was never intended to become anything at all. And it's a very sobering subject, which makes it even more surprising.
I appreciate the amount of interest and support I've received making this channel, and it's refreshing to see that more and more people are finally starting to get it.
So yeah, just want to explain the process of how this channel came to be. The content was forged by the pragmatic necessity of constantly requiring sources and also always discovering new content once your eyes are opened to the third position. Then as I went a long I learned how many people are still asleep at the wheel on this topic, and it really fueled my fire to find new information.
Ultimately, the amount of ignorance surrounding Hitler in the based Telegram circles, is what really made me understand the need for this subject to be brought to light--and why I continue to push this message.
So thank you for taking the time to challenge your beliefs. The WN movement will always be divided until this issue has been sorted. The battle is on us to get passed Nazism.

"... in Himmler’s view the Christianization of the Teutons was above all the fault of ‘Charles the Frank’, that is, Charlemagne, whom he repeatedly accused in public speeches of slaughtering the Saxons; his son, Louis the Pious, was for Himmler simply ‘infected with Jewishness’. Himmler’s negative appraisal of Charlemagne made no impression on Hitler, however, who in his speech to the party conference in 1935 emphasized that in the process of forming the empire of the early Middle Ages Christianity had been effective in creating communities, and declared Charlemagne the historic unifier of the Reich, a judgement he backed up with comments in his private circle. THEREUPON HIMMLER REVERSED HIS OPINION: in the SS Guidance Booklets there appeared an article by H. W. Scheidt, head of the indoctrination office of Alfred Rosenberg (usually regarded as Himmler’s main ideological competitor), in which the latter declared that the ‘true reason for the conflicts with the Saxons and the other methods of subjugation employed by Charlemagne was his thoroughly Germanic will to power and his recognition that the centralized political power he enjoyed needed urgently to be extended’. Himmler himself was strikingly slow to comment. Only in 1944 did he concede that Charlemagne was the ‘subject of much controversy, much revered and in the final analysis—in spite of all the things we [ . . . ] don’t like about him and which we must nevertheless understand as part of the power struggle involved in forming an empire—a great man, because he founded the Reich’."

— Peter Longerich, Heinrich Himmler, A life, Peter Longreich

I don't mean to spread any anti-German sentiments when I refer to the Nazis in a negative sense. Germany was built up for glory and was horribly misguided by a psychopathic leadership. I don't blame the Germans, but we need to look at the facts and how Hitler and the Nazi administration strategically maneuvered the population into warfare. They were also put into workcamps similar to gulags if they didn't want to fulfill conscription. So they were under tremendous pressure to conform and be a part of the war machine build up.

It's kind of how the US has been using their army for all kinds of devastating uses for the past 50 years. Do you blame the average American for that? No of course not, they are just cogs in the wheel. So I'm just clarifying that the goal is simply to point out the intentions of the Nazi admin and the banking elites, and not necessarily referring to the German people themselves.

Yes the Germans did terrible things to other Europeans to be fair, but they did pay for it ten fold. So whats done is done and now it's time to move passed it all, we have bigger fish to fry with mass immigration.

"According to Thomas Weber...
In 1918, the Jew Kurt Eisner became minister-president of the newly proclaimed People’s State of Bavaria for the Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany (USPD).
Eisner was involved in organising a strike in the naval ports of Wilhelmshaven on 29 October 1918 that effectively sabotaged the German war effort against Britain in World War I. This was followed by Kaiser Wilhelm II (KG, annulled in 1915) abdicating his throne.

On 21 February 1919, Eisner was shot dead by the right-wing nationalist Anton Graf von Arco auf Valley (a.k.a. Arco-Valley).
None other than Adolf Hitler attended the funeral procession of the Jewish Communist Eisner, and more in general publicly supported for the founding father of the Bavarian Soviet Republic, Kurt Eisner, and then “Hitler made sure figuratively and quite possibly literally to burn any traces of his activities during this period”.

On the night of 6–7 April, Communists and anarchists declared a Bavarian Soviet Republic, with Ernst Toller as chief of state.
Adolf Hitler himself acted as a liaison between his army battalion and the Soviet’s Department of Propaganda: https://www.commentary.org/articles/andrew-roberts/hitlers-first-war-by-thomas-weber/