Exposing Hitler as Zionist
1.19K subscribers
574 photos
372 videos
212 files
521 links
Download Telegram
National *Socialists* were left wingers as well.
👏6👍1
Forwarded from -
Hitler's hatred for Germanic Paganism and Pre-Christian Germanic people.

Continuation of:
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1351
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1335

> In Mein Kampf, Hitler spurned the right-wing nationalists who enthused about Germanic prehistory, especially those wanting to resurrect ancient Germanic religions. He stated, “Especially with the so-called religious reformers on an old Germanic basis, I always have the feeling that they were sent by those powers which do not want the resurrection of our people.” Hitler had no interest in neo-paganism or mysticism, which he considered counterproductive politically, because it would lead to religious squabbling and destroy German unity.
At the Nuremberg Party Rally in September 1938, Hitler confronted head-on the neo-paganism in his own party. Some Germans were becoming unsettled at Rosenberg’s and Himmler’s attempts to resurrect ancient Germanic gods, rites, and shrines. Hitler reassured his followers that this did not represent the official party position, nor did it correspond with his own perspective. [...] This speech was an open rebuke to Himmler, Rosenberg, and other neo-pagans, who were building shrines and formulating rites and ceremonies to honor ancient Germanic gods.
[...] In August 1935, Hitler told Goebbels, “Rosenberg, Himmler and Darré must put an end to their cultic nonsense.” Speer remembered Hitler as utterly contemptuous of Himmler’s penchant for Germanic mythology. Despite his admiration for Himmler’s devotion to the Nazi cause and his organizational skills, behind his back Hitler derided his religious tendencies, exclaiming, “What nonsense! Here we have at last reached an age that has left all mysticism behind it, and now he wants to start that all over again. We might just as well have stayed with the church. At least it had tradition. To think that I may some day be turned into an SS saint! Can you imagine it? I would turn over in my grave.” He also contemptuously dismissed Rosenberg’s Myth as “stuff nobody can understand.” Hitler’s military adjutant likewise recalled that Hitler disapproved of Himmler’s plans to reintroduce the cult of Wotan and Thor. In October 1941, Hitler ranted again about the foolishness of trying to resurrect the cult of Wotan. Even Rosenberg recognized that Hitler was not sympathetic with his efforts to revive Germanic paganism. [...] Rosenberg then confessed that Hitler was even suspicious of Rosenberg’s own studies of Germanic prehistory. Hitler, he recalled, was not interested in the huts of the ancient Germans, but rather looked to the temples of Greece as cultural models.

Source: Richard Weikart, Hitler's Religion.
Forwarded from -
Daily reminder: Hitler literally admired Charlemagne, who brutally slaughtered the great Pagan Saxon people and used underhanded tactics and brutal ways to enforce Christianity onto the rest of the masses; he even went on to say that without that brutal Christianization and butchering of Pagans, Germanic people would have ceased to exist.

"CHARLEMAGNE WAS HITLER'S HERO" - OTTO DEITRICH

For more info:
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1381
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1351
https://t.me/exposinghitler/893
👍4🔥3
Hitler was simping for Arabs and Islam.
According to Hitler
> Pre-Christian Germanic culture was on the level of Maori.
> Europeans must have lost the Battle of Poitiers and converted to Islam.
>The Arabs in Spain had an "infinitely noble" culture, while the pre-Christian Germans's culture was on the level of Maroi.
🔥11👍2
The ADL hires these retarded Nazi Feds to stir up their own Hollywood brand of antisemitism
💯14
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
PraxBen on that "economic miracle" bit we always hear about.

"By 1936 the German recovery was no more advanced than that of Britain or the United States"

"Deficit spending was dominated by war preparation"

"Full scale rearmament had begun by 1934 and 70% of government expenditures had gone toward it by 1939"

"The economy recovery of the 1930s was like a balloon. The Nazis tried to fill the balloon with air but they could never tie the knot to keep it stable. The massive short term gain with equally massive long term consequences"

From the booklet "Deficit Spending in the Nazi Recovery"

Follow @redideologies
👍4
Red Ideologies
PraxBen on that "economic miracle" bit we always hear about. "By 1936 the German recovery was no more advanced than that of Britain or the United States" "Deficit spending was dominated by war preparation" "Full scale rearmament had begun by 1934 and 70%…
As mentioned before, the so called "economic miracle", and "booming economy", were simply the German rearmament process. If you take unemployed people and give them temporary jobs in the military, that's not actually creating permanent jobs or improving the economy, it's just artificial inflation.

This also shows that Germany had full intentions on engaging in warfare. You can't possibly build up one of the greatest armies of all time "by accident". It takes years of mental and physical preparation on a population, in order to make them war-ready and their society into a war-machine.
👍8
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Hitler, Rosenberg, Goebbels and others differed on many topics and were not all marching in lockstep.

"the 'National Socialist worldview' did not exist - that is why I used the term 'Hitlerism'... I show that there were significant differences between the worldview of Alfred Rosenberg and Heinrich Himmler, criticized by Hitler as "mysticism," and his own views. [...] evidenced by the work of Frank-Lothar Kroll, "Utopia as Ideology," written in 1998 as a post-doctoral thesis (with Gregor Schöllgen and Hans-Ulrich Thamer, among others), which closed an important gap in research. In addition to Hitler's ideology, Kroll analyzed those of Rosenberg, Richard Walther Darre, Himmler, and Joseph Goebbels. Kroll chose to examine the thinking of these five National Socialists because the dual criterion of ideological formative power and a de facto involvement in the concrete political decision-making process of the Third Reich applied to them. Kroll states that there were only a few similarities between these National Socialist "masterminds," apart from the awareness that the establishment of National Socialism would usher in a fundamental epochal change in world history that would create a "new man" and a "new world. " Beyond this common ground, which in my view is rather thin, there were considerable differences, as Kroll shows. Hitler, for example, had regarded "any Germanic enthusiasm, as it was widespread above all in the environment of Himmler's SS, but also in the context of the >Blut und Boden< ideology championed by Darre [ . . . ], as an insipid private quirk of sectarians alienated from life and time and detrimental to the ultimate goals of National Socialism". "Contrary to obvious and widespread generalizations, Hitler had very little sympathy for the world of Germanicism. "

Source: Rainer Zitelmann, Hitler. Selbstverständnis eines Revolutionärs

Follow @redideologies
👏6
No words necessary
👍4🔥4
Forwarded from -
Nazism is essentially an anti-intellectual, retarded movement; it either robs an individual of basic reading or thinking skills, or the individual who drifts towards Nazism already lacks both skills. The following example is enough to demonstrate that. In this pro-Nazi channel, in this post, a Nazi, Adrien Arcand, is quoted saying that he has read the encyclical 'Mit Brennender Sorge' a whopping hundred times and came to the conclusion that it doesn't condemn Nazism at all.

Now, contrary to Nazi Adrien Arcand's claim, Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, who was one of the editors of the encyclical, outrightly said that the encyclical was indeed a condemnation of Nazism (check the image).
It is hilarious to think that the Nazi, Adrien Arcand, knows more about the text than the individual who contributed to it.
🔥5👍2
This is the sort of maturity and IQ level of your average Hitlerites. I usually make the same arguments about "how is he based if he killed so many euros and plundered European cultures", it's a very linear and straight forward argument, and frankly impossible to deny this fact---and they typically will respond with "Jew! Fed! Subverter!" Or some sort of elementary slur as shown here--while never addressing the actual argument.

It's blatent cognitive dissonance and cult of personality. They are much like a religious zealots who lash out when you criticize their religion/skydad.
💯19👍4
Forwarded from -
Read the following 👇
Forwarded from -
Forwarded from -
Now we know why the Nazis are repeating the same debunked meme again and again. And why do they simply call everything that destroys their opinion fake?
🔥4
Forwarded from -