The Bolshevism & Zionism Dialectic _ Christopher Jon Bjerknes (720p_30fps_H264-192kbit_AAC)

If you're new here, watch the know more news with Adam Green and Christopher Jon Bjerknes, it's a great start to understanding the third position on Hitler.

'Work Makes you Free' is often interpreted as a cruel ironic joke placed on the inmates, but it's actually quite literal.

A question I get asked a lot on this subject is: ''but the gas chambers were faked and the numbers were extremely exaggerated (how could this be?)''

This is why you need to look into CJB's work because the third position doesn't have the same narratives as the mainstream.

The actual intention/goal of the work camps was to sort the wheat from the chaff as a eugenics program. The elites wanted to sort out who was the fittest for being sent over to Palestine. They would give them the 'choice' of being worked to death in the camps, or being sent over to establish Israel. So the phrase 'work sets your free' is actually to be taken at face value, if you understand it's true context.

https://youtu.be/ZY3IEySys5Y?t=211

They told the inmates that work can help you find god through struggle. I doubt any of the inmates understood that it was a eugenics program designed by their own elites and not the Germans.

Hitler had a deep hatred for the Noble Pre-Christian Germans.

From: Greeks, Romans, Germans How the Nazis Usurped Europe’s Classical Past, Johann Chapoutot

>Hitler found the unrestrained celebration of Germanentum on the part of Himmler and the SS to be so irritating. Indeed, he displayed a vicious wit in making fun of their Germanophilia, which he ridiculed in both public and private, chiding them for their love of crude, retrograde folklore that glorified a group of primitive idiots. In one of his public speeches, dripping with sarcasm, he declared he had no desire to take up “a bearskin to retrace the path of Germanic migrations”: “We are National Socialists, and we have nothing in common with this Völkisch idea . . . nor with petit-bourgeois Völkisch kitsch, or with heavy beards and long hair. We have all cut our hair quite short.” Long hair equaled savagery; the shaved heads of the Romans and the SA equaled civilization
[...]
Hitler thus echoed, in private as in public, the most humiliating prejudices about the early Germans
[...]
Hitler completely discounted the reactionary views of the SS, which attempted to resurrect Germanic cults, customs, and traditions, following Himmler’s lead. Not only were these cults and traditions culturally the equivalent of the Maoris’ gris-gris, but they had naturally disappeared over time because they were destined to perish: “It seems to me that nothing would be more foolish than to re-establish the worship of Wotan. Our old mythology had ceased to be viable when Christianity implanted itself. Nothing dies unless it is moribund. . . . It’s not desirable that the whole of humanity should be stultified.”

I often encounter the first two from critics. It doesn't phase me, I know they will get through it and come out better for it. Just don't be depressed for too long (or hopefully not at all), we need your spirits up.

Dr William Luther Pierce Final Speech

According to “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” Hitler knew invading Poland would spark a war and was preparing his generals for it.

Taken from this book

This channel: https://t.me/HitlerHatedChrist is seriously mistaken.

Hitler, the anti-white, definitely hated Christianity as presented by the Church or even the Bible; there is nothing to dispute on that, but he did not hate JEWsus. Being the great anti-white that he was, Hitler attributed his very ideology to none other than JEWsus.

https://t.me/exposinghitler/1072
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1073

The bullshit that Hitler spews in Otto Wagner's memoir on how he owes his ideology to none other than the rabbi JEWsus, is something that he said in his 1920 speech, so it cannot be handwaved as not being reliable. Since it is evidently reliable, as the recollection of Otto Wagner and the speech corroborate.

So, Hitler admired JEWsus, to what extent did he admire the anti-White rabbi Jewsus you may ask? He admired rabbi Jewsus to such an extent that he might probably slap you hard if you spoke sh*t about his beloved rabbi JEWsus.

What is important to notice is that while Hitler, the anti-White, admired and revered JEWsus, he had a deep hatred for the pre-Christian Germanic people and spoke badly about our Odin on numerous occasions.
example:
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1286
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1052

Hitler had a very deep admiration for the anti-White Charlemagne, who butchered the honourable Pagan Saxon in the most despicable way.
https://t.me/exposinghitler/893

It doesn't end there; Hitler went as far as saying there is no German people without Christianity: "The German people did not come into being merely as a product of ancient ideas and CHRISTIANITY but as a product of violence, ancient ideas, and CHRISTIANITY." (Monologue on March 31, 1942, in Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier, ed. Henry Picker)

This exact idea is again repeated in an official book titled "Why are we fighting for?" which Hitler officially endorsed.
"the Nazi propaganda pamphlet from 1944 titled Wofür kämpfen wir? (Why Are We Fighting?), which explained the ideological basis for the expansionist war Germany was fighting. In a letter published in the front of the pamphlet, Hitler personally endorsed the book and instructed German officers to use it regularly to indoctrinate their soldiers in the National Socialist worldview." (Richard Weikart, Hitler's Religion)

Continuation of: https://t.me/exposinghitler/1083

From: German Massacres Against Polish Civilians, 1939-1945, Daniel Brewing

>Von Alvensleben always identified the ‘pacification of the territory’ as the overriding priority, which his commanders unerringly interpreted as an injunction to carry out mass shootings. The basic question for all his subordinates was always: ‘How many Polacks … have been done away with so far?’ If, in von Alvensleben’s view, certain units had shot dead too few Poles within a certain period, he sought to increase the number of killings by issuing reprimands. After one of his commanders had carried out no shootings within a certain period of time, von Alvensleben asked him about his profession in harsh tones: ‘When I had answered that I was a farmer’, the commander recalled, ‘von Alvensleben said that in that case I could surely slaughter pigs’. According to recent estimates, the units of the Volksdeutscher Selbstschutz murdered up to 30,000 people in the first few months of the occupation [of Poland].
[...]
After a bout of heavy drinking, A., a member of the Volksdeutscher Selbstschutz, entered ‘a Polish house’ with his comrades. He purported to have been tasked with ‘carrying out checks on home-distilled schnapps’. A. struck out in all directions, maltreated the two male residents of the house and tried to rape their wives in front of them. For some men, joining the Selbstschutz was evidently a chance to act out their criminal proclivities with impunity. The ethnic German S., for example, having ‘drunk a large quantity of alcohol’, carried out regular bicycle inspections on village streets, which he was in no way authorized to do. A paedophile, this gave him the opportunity to abuse children and adolescents. In the wake of one bicycle inspection, he raped a 14-year-old girl in the nearby woods. The departure point and setting for these instances of violent self-empowerment were often village pubs, in which ethnic Germans initially continued to encounter their Polish neighbours on a regular basis. Time and again, in a state of drunkenness they attacked Polish patrons. The ethnic German K., for example, struck a Pole on the head with his full beer glass with such force that ‘the beer glass shattered, with one piece penetrating the Pole’s neck right next to the artery’. Ethnic Germans used their position in the Selbstschutz to rob prostitutes at gunpoint after sexual intercourse and raided the luggage of Polish evacuees. They frequently directed their violence against their own ranks, threatening their comrades and beating their superiors while inebriated. Evidently, it was by no means easy to channel the potential for violence that had been unleashed into the desired channels. The removal of traditional constraints produced an excess of violence that could flow in two directions: outwards, against the supposed Polish ‘subhumans’, but often inwards as well, against other members of the occupying society. The arbitrary invasion of homes, the rape of Polish women, the sexual abuse of Polish girls, the maltreatment of and brutal violence against Polish men – all these forms of violence were widespread among members of the Self-Protection Force. In significant part, their roots lay in the ennobling ‘You can!’ – that licence for violence issued upon entry into the organization. This opened the floodgates for ethnic Germans to indulge in multiple forms of violence. Fantasies of omnipotence, it seems, could now be lived out in an unfettered way.

From: German Massacres Against Polish Civilians, 1939-1945, Daniel Brewing

> In addition, a plethora of individual cases point to the regular execution of particularly brutal acts of violence. Brutality is understood here as a specific form of excessive violence that ‘takes place beyond any comprehensible cost-benefit calculation’. Of a multitude of possible examples, the events in the ‘House of Suffering’, the offices of the Selbstschutz in Rippin, undoubtedly stand out. Here, members of its local unit tortured their Polish victims in every imaginable way. They were attacked with whips studded with razor-sharp pieces of iron; nails were rammed into their backs; vicious dogs were set on the bound captives; plaster was poured into the mouths of screaming victims; eyes were gouged out; Poles had to lick up their own blood from the floor and the heads of young children were smashed against the wall in front of their parents; Polish women had their clothes ripped off and – in a certain order – every member of the unit was permitted to rape them. The practice of brutality by members of the force was evidently highly creative. The ethnic German perpetrators were imaginative, constantly discovering new ways of humiliating, tormenting and maltreating their Polish victims. Their torture chambers emerge as a ‘laboratory of destructive imagination’. The atrocities committed by the Selbstschutz make it clear that the goal was not to kill their Polish victims as quickly as possible. Death was to occur only after the prolonged infliction of suffering and torment. Before the victims were finally killed, they were to be ‘defiled, humiliated and mutilated’ in every conceivable way. As Michaela Christ has emphasized in a different context, this reveals a ‘curiosity about and … lust for violence’ that feeds on victims’ pain. Atrocities were not focused solely on the victims’ bodies but also entailed attempts to attack their psyches: the perpetrators gloried in their fear, panic and despair. Part of what they were doing, then, was toying with their victims’ emotions in the cruellest of ways – for example, when young children were battered in front of their helpless parents.
The brutal acts carried out in Rippin’s Selbstschutz headquarters were executed by a collective rather than individuals. Momentum will no doubt have been injected into the gang rape of young Polish women, for example, by a degree of mutual goading, as the men egged each other on and provided each other with mutual confirmation that their actions were beyond reproach.

These Pro Neo Nazi Groups are all over TG are full of idiotic Pro Nazi Propaganda, which dozens of people will positively react to. In this Photo Hitler is with the six year old Jewish girl that I mentioned in a previous post. Why was Hitler hanging around a six year old Jewish girl for 5 years? This is the context that these Nazi larpers are missing. They only see the pro-Hitler propaganda and stupidly admire it.

Adolf Hitler with a Little Girl Wearing a Traditional Costume, Berghof, Obersalzberg, 1936

This post

Der "Volksdeutsche Selbstschutz" in Polen 1939/1940
Christian Jansen and Arno Weckbecker