meanwhile, let's check up on the new mayor of manchester... oh there she is

As soon as the only paper which questions the carbon dioxide horse manure is sold to the Germans, they start bombarding their readers with this garbage

they will come up with a (predetermined) solution which down the road will lead to an even worse problem, by intent.

it's how they do things. create a problem, shift in outrageous policy.

perhaps 'digital id to protect our borders'...

or perhaps biometric data collection... hah, april 2026. i bet that's part of their 'solution'

https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen/smart-borders/entry-exit-system_en

ah, i can do this better - June, 2026

golly, right?

https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/pact-migration-and-asylum_en

oh i see, we have ETIAS as well coming into force

https://travel-europe.europa.eu/etias/about-etias/what-is-etias

short and sweet

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/ceuta

PDF

oh hello, hello - what do we have here...

this, quite potentially, is the pinnacle, and it takes us straight back to alexander bogdanov.

what bogdanov realised is that it's not about the owners of the means of production - it's about the connectivity tissue between producer and consumer. the administrators.

project insight maps the global supply chain... for what purpose?

flow control, quite obviously.

flow control

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/flow-control?utm_source=publication-search

Well that didn’t take long.

Germans buy out the telegraph which immediately becomes just like the rest of the lying, propagandising, untrustworthy MSM

A number of people have asked my for a buymeacoffee address because they refuse to support substack for various reasons. So here it is - thank you.

https://buymeacoffee.com/escapekey

tying kennedy in with the rest of the construct

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/kennedy

PDF

sooo….. if IIASA information travels through the NGFS to become financial information, through the IPCC to become about carbon emissions, and through the IPBES to become about biodiversity... isnt it highly questionable that the scenarios picked by those three are not identical?

also - since they're picked scenarios, the underlying science is supposedly legit - but they cherry pick the specific strands of science which are useful to the narrative and there's no peer review for that - only the science itself.

ergo, the science is supposedly legit, but the scenarios allow cherry picking