now we have ISO standardising, while ie the OECD produces normalised data on a global scale, which can be embedded into conditional finance down to the level of the individual through conditional CBDCs.
and everything aligns to moses hess’ ethic, lenin’s ‘accounting and control’, julius wolf’s developments across the entire hess sphere, eduard bernstein’s repivoting society around public-private partnerships where an eventual CSO would dictate the common purpose…
carnegie adopted the same model wrt ‘peace’, while leonard s woolf generalised for political purpose, alfred zimmern implemented through the league of nations, and when the unoted nations came down the road, it was essentially league of nations in institutional form carried forward - except of course they formed the ECOSOC, which serves as the administrative component, organising reinicke’s trisectoral networks which quietly places the foundation-funded NGOs in power…
holy moly, 2 years down the line and the loop closes, almost fully…
and everything aligns to moses hess’ ethic, lenin’s ‘accounting and control’, julius wolf’s developments across the entire hess sphere, eduard bernstein’s repivoting society around public-private partnerships where an eventual CSO would dictate the common purpose…
carnegie adopted the same model wrt ‘peace’, while leonard s woolf generalised for political purpose, alfred zimmern implemented through the league of nations, and when the unoted nations came down the road, it was essentially league of nations in institutional form carried forward - except of course they formed the ECOSOC, which serves as the administrative component, organising reinicke’s trisectoral networks which quietly places the foundation-funded NGOs in power…
holy moly, 2 years down the line and the loop closes, almost fully…
👍3⚡1
bogdanov’s tektology eventually leads to artificial intelligence which runs the evaluative clearing without humans, the conditional CBDCs replace the behavioural settlement, where the ‘ethic’ is determined by the AI, leaving only the structural translation of ‘ethics’ into a ‘cognitive standard’ as the only job left for humanity to eventually do down the line (apart from menial work)… marx in fact stated as much through ‘fragment on machines’, but all of this - ALL of this - is working on the prerequisite that everything is a closed system.
it cannot operate open, because that generates unpredictable data.
it cannot operate open, because that generates unpredictable data.
👍3
rothschild, rockefeller, warburg, carnegie, then a fair distance, then ford, soros, gates, ...
👍1
and i have seen NO trace of royal families, 'black nobility' or other committee of 300 inspired nonsense, so if you object, please supply sourcing, ideally primary.
👍5
the frame is the tree of life, spinoza capped it at the top, laitman/burstein capped it at the bottom, rothschild and rockefeller realised the clearinghouse was the visible centre of power, but real power operated in the cognitive standards layer… and the soviet union, nazi germany, and the liberal world order ALL implemented the same system just in a different order.
and that system is fundamentally based upon a ‘global ethic’, structured around reorganised money… and it’s exactly this, which conditional CBDCs will close, thus enabling moses hess’s vision. hess, the father of communism.
and that system is fundamentally based upon a ‘global ethic’, structured around reorganised money… and it’s exactly this, which conditional CBDCs will close, thus enabling moses hess’s vision. hess, the father of communism.
👍3
and i keep arriving at this very same conclusion from different angles, in fact, arguably all essays ive written in 2026 fundamentally have only patched different gaps. i really cannot see this not holding.
the weak points of the system are
1. being seen whole. everything is compartmentalised, and there’s no defense against being seen whole
2. combinatorial explosion through ‘multi-crisis’ modelling.
the retarded system is closed, which means all they will succeed in, is developing the mother of all black swans.
the weak points of the system are
1. being seen whole. everything is compartmentalised, and there’s no defense against being seen whole
2. combinatorial explosion through ‘multi-crisis’ modelling.
the retarded system is closed, which means all they will succeed in, is developing the mother of all black swans.
🔥2😱1
moses hess brought the ‘ethical national identity’, herzl turned that into statistics, lenin into national statistics, bogdanov into a system of control, and down the line, that became artificial intelligence.
flow is calculated through leontief’s input-output analysis, and the entire thing was predicted by marx in ‘fragment on machines’
this wasn’t the outcome of extraordinary capability, it was because in a closed system, all flows eventually returns to source.
to control this flow, he claimed to have determined there was a difference between MCM and CMC, however, this can really only be determined throigh a conditionality check on every transaction, but in reality, it can’t even do that because investing and consumption are not clearly defined, and one often becomes the other in hindsight.
the entire system relies on the claim of total visibility, which of course is incredibly retarded. it’ll lead to the mother of black swans, it’s just a matter of time.
lenin outright stated that ‘accounting and control’ should run through the big banks, without which, the socialist experiement couldn’t come to pass.
and that leads to the final realisation here - julius wolf and eduard bernstein’s public-private-partnership for the ‘social good’ (as judged by an NGO in contemporary terms) in reality is absolutely nothing more but a flow, regulated by that third party.
the third party, itself, is a clearinghouse, mediating between two conflicting partners, judging when and why capital should flow.
the public-private partnership is thus not a governance function - it’s a clearing function. the clearing itself is carried out by a structure, which at its ethical foundation is represented through a ‘civil society organisation’ aka an NGO, whose ‘ethic’ is filtered through various international institutional machinery.
democracy was stripped in the process, but none even focus on that, because the issue of private greed is bound to come up, which of course serves as a bloody good distraction.
oh wait - there’s the input constraint again.
flow is calculated through leontief’s input-output analysis, and the entire thing was predicted by marx in ‘fragment on machines’
this wasn’t the outcome of extraordinary capability, it was because in a closed system, all flows eventually returns to source.
to control this flow, he claimed to have determined there was a difference between MCM and CMC, however, this can really only be determined throigh a conditionality check on every transaction, but in reality, it can’t even do that because investing and consumption are not clearly defined, and one often becomes the other in hindsight.
the entire system relies on the claim of total visibility, which of course is incredibly retarded. it’ll lead to the mother of black swans, it’s just a matter of time.
lenin outright stated that ‘accounting and control’ should run through the big banks, without which, the socialist experiement couldn’t come to pass.
and that leads to the final realisation here - julius wolf and eduard bernstein’s public-private-partnership for the ‘social good’ (as judged by an NGO in contemporary terms) in reality is absolutely nothing more but a flow, regulated by that third party.
the third party, itself, is a clearinghouse, mediating between two conflicting partners, judging when and why capital should flow.
the public-private partnership is thus not a governance function - it’s a clearing function. the clearing itself is carried out by a structure, which at its ethical foundation is represented through a ‘civil society organisation’ aka an NGO, whose ‘ethic’ is filtered through various international institutional machinery.
democracy was stripped in the process, but none even focus on that, because the issue of private greed is bound to come up, which of course serves as a bloody good distraction.
oh wait - there’s the input constraint again.
haha yeah so it was even mentioned at the Nuremburg trial post-ww2
yet, this was the model they used, and Keynes thought it was awesome
’They financed extensive purchases in occupied countries through clearing arrangements by which they exacted loans from the occupied countries’
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/count3.asp
yet, this was the model they used, and Keynes thought it was awesome
’They financed extensive purchases in occupied countries through clearing arrangements by which they exacted loans from the occupied countries’
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/count3.asp
👍3❤2🔥2
the nazis understood the incredible powers of the clearinghouse, just as alfred de rothschild did in 1886, and julius wolf in 1892
👍2
alfred de rothschild, 1886:
‘… in fact, the system of the Bankers Clearing House has reached such a high degree of perfection…’
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/own-nothing-control-everything?utm_source=publication-search
‘… in fact, the system of the Bankers Clearing House has reached such a high degree of perfection…’
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/own-nothing-control-everything?utm_source=publication-search
👍7
Das einzige Praktische, die einzige Waffe für die gesamte Lenkung des Handels zwischen den Völkern ist die Regelung des Zahlungsverkehrs
🔥5
Der einzelne Interessent merkt hiervon nichts mehr. Für ihn ist praktisch ein Zustand wiederhergestellt, der sich für seine wirtschaftlichen Bedürfnisse und seine wirtschaftliche Betätigung nicht mehr sehr wesentlich von dem Zustand der freien Devisenbewirtschaftung unterscheidet
🔥1
Die neue europäische Wirtschaft wird die Erfüllung ihrer sozialen Verpflichtungen als ihre vornehmste Aufgabe zu betrachten haben.
Eine solche Wirtschaftsgesinnung verlangt ein soziales Gewissen.
Eine solche Wirtschaftsgesinnung verlangt ein soziales Gewissen.
Nicht die Maschine soll den Menschen beherrschen, sondern der Mensch die Maschine; nicht die technisch-wirtschaftliche Entwicklung Volk und Staat, sondern die Nation die Wirtschaft und die Technik ihren Zielen dienstbar machen.
Die Entstehung der modernen Weltwirtschaft... war aber keine in sich ruhende Realität, sie lebte von der englischen Weltmacht und machte gleichzeitig die festlandeuropäischen Nationen gewissermaßen zu provinziellen Gliedern des englischen Weltreichs.
Die Entstehung der modernen Weltwirtschaft... war aber keine in sich ruhende Realität, sie lebte von der englischen Weltmacht und machte gleichzeitig die festlandeuropäischen Nationen gewissermaßen zu provinziellen Gliedern des englischen Weltreichs.
🔥1
the economy must serve political goals… the world economy already serves whoever controls the power behind it… every state on earth has already made its economy a function of state direction…
= the economy is the control surface of the political system
= the economy is the control surface of the political system
👍5
Eine solche Wirtschaftsgesinnung verlangt ein soziales Gewissen.
Die neue europäische Wirtschaft wird die Erfüllung ihrer sozialen Verpflichtungen als ihre vornehmste Aufgabe zu betrachten haben.
= the economy is a control instrument subordinated to political purpose; every state has already made its economy a function of state direction; the purpose it must serve is the fulfilment of social obligations; the world economy serves whoever operates it
and this is to happen using a ‘third way’ approach that isn’t obviously visible from the surface
Die neue europäische Wirtschaft wird die Erfüllung ihrer sozialen Verpflichtungen als ihre vornehmste Aufgabe zu betrachten haben.
= the economy is a control instrument subordinated to political purpose; every state has already made its economy a function of state direction; the purpose it must serve is the fulfilment of social obligations; the world economy serves whoever operates it
and this is to happen using a ‘third way’ approach that isn’t obviously visible from the surface
hence this is meant to be global, it's meant to serve social objectives above all, and the economy is the most important tool for this purpose.
it's moses hess' ideology, right there.
it's moses hess' ideology, right there.
👍2
the reason why julius wolf isn’t a household name, is because no-one has any interest in him being one.
👍3
amusing. so that's basically the same strucural logic i observed wrt JFK...
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/murder-on-the-orient-express?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/murder-on-the-orient-express?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
Murder on the Orient Express
The Assassination of John F Kennedy
🔥1
1993, hans kung, parliament of the world’s religions, ‘a global ethic’ - primarily a social ethic
1995, leo swidler, ‘a global ethic’ - a social and environmental ethic, through ‘rights and responsibilities’
2000, earth charter - an environmental and planetary ethic
2015, SDGs - a social, environmental and planetary ethic, managed through ‘rights and responsibilities’
2015, paris agreement - a way to monetise the ‘ethic’
they progressively developed the ‘ethics’ framework. and it arguably began with paul carus in 1893, chairing the parliament of the world’s religions
1995, leo swidler, ‘a global ethic’ - a social and environmental ethic, through ‘rights and responsibilities’
2000, earth charter - an environmental and planetary ethic
2015, SDGs - a social, environmental and planetary ethic, managed through ‘rights and responsibilities’
2015, paris agreement - a way to monetise the ‘ethic’
they progressively developed the ‘ethics’ framework. and it arguably began with paul carus in 1893, chairing the parliament of the world’s religions
🔥3