oh golly - that’s the day after i posted the essay on julius wolf

first off, thank you for this report, however after largely completing the first read (also spending time cross-referening, etc) i have bit of a luxury problem - there's so much ground to cover in this report, i dont even know where to start

i'm pretty well read-up on the clearinghouse and its associated structure, and this document is frankly mind-blowing.

i think, fundamentally, we've been told such an epic lie that half the problem is delivering the information in a way that doesn't come across 'conspiratorial'. and i say that, even with the serious amounts of sources i've been able to drum up

i think, fundamentally, germany, france and the united kingdom have tried to get this through, each with their own 'ethic', with various levels of success

but what i struggle to reconcile is that all three 'ethics' appear somewhat aligned with a particular book released in the 19th century by the father of a notorious quasi-religion.

if i'm right - though i have been wrong before - then this completely changes the history of the 20th century.

the 20th century was fundamentally a battle over who would occupy the clearinghouse. and the foundations in the 60s attempted to push the same model through 'the world congress for freedom and democracy'

the communists, nazis, and the liberal world order might have disagreed on the ideology - but not on the clearinghouse

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-fourth-casualty?utm_source=publication-search

Apparently someone is impersonating me through PMs. Not much I can do about that of course.

My personal account is not named ‘esc’, it’s a title I saw on an episode of the simpsons.

So block any personal messages from ‘esc’ unless if course you want to speak to scammers.

Over the past week, Paul Cudenec and Meryl Nass have each driven almost as much traffic to my substack than google, and more than Twitter.

I obviously appreciate that, but find that almost unreal. I get absolutely no exposure courtesy of the three major intelligence operated fronts.

I might start data mining this because it would provide a large grained exposure of which essays were not popular with the crooks in intelligence.

why the heck did the OECD remove this page?

https://web.archive.org/web/20250316093542/https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/leveraging-private-finance-for-development/blended-finance.html

while trying to wrap my head around how to cover the 1942 report, i thought i'd finish this one

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/settling-keynes

PDF

yeah, julius wolf is our man.

he basically developed an international system of social policy, and it ran straight through economics

no bloody wonder everyone keeps quiet about him.

i will rightfully claim i got there first! 🙂

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-man-who-history-forgot?utm_source=publication-search

defening silence… apart from twitter, facebook and google who all cut my impression counts at the same time.

which, again, suggests coordination.

it’s intelligence. must be.

the ‘third way’ isn't political compromise but the operating position of the clearing architecture itself

More inversion

‘We need to save it’ = ‘we need to further develop it’

https://amp.dw.com/en/what-is-the-rules-based-order-and-can-it-survive/a-76002970

what if the MCM / CMC differentiation per Marx’s Capital is not so much about the transaction itself?

what if it’s a veiled issue with capital buffers themselves; savings?

a worker wouldn’t be expected to have any savings, because savings introduces unpredictability into the system which is undesireable because it leads to misprediction?