italy’s the standout in that document.

so there’s the periodic netting of balances, in the italy-germany agreement.

that was also part of the EPU, post-ww2.

and italy also identified the issue relating the multilateral clearing - unless it’s all based around gold.

so the EPU, in essence, wasn’t ‘new’ - it’s was a reimplementation of an Axis mechanism, under an Allied flag.

ewll, technically, it was julius wolf’s, but italy and germany had implemented it in practise.

the italy-german bilateral agreement was in effect a prototype of what became the EPU post-WW2.

the nazis saw the clearinghouse as a mechanism for extraction. keynes looked at the same plan, thought it was excellent, and then added some claims of honesty to it, thus airbrushing its potential for abuse.

and the nazis were actively using that mechanism since 1934, and centralised it all in 1940 before beginning work on standards, customs, regulations, …

all we really need here is a nazi emphasis on doing this for the sake of ‘ethics’ in some context, and the entire julius wolf palette is full… hmm… Kraft durch Freude?

https://www.dhm.de/lemo/kapitel/ns-regime/ns-organisationen/kdf

bloody hell. there is it.

… ok. *blink*. speechless.

‘… served the vision of a classless society in line with the National Socialist concept of the "people's community.”’

https://www.dhm.de/lemo/kapitel/ns-regime/ns-organisationen/kdf

so the nazis had the clearing function, they had the common standards, regulation, customs, single market, harmonised trade policy, … and they had, at least for the working class, the concept of a classless society, which was propagated through education… the real difference here was that the central ‘ethic’ was a racial one, whereas communism has a social one.

so… this is the full implementation of julius wolf’s programme, all centred around… ethics of pure will?

ethics of pure will is hermann cohen, ftr

the man who subordinated religion to ethics...

so from where i sit, there's little difference between the soviet union an nazi state except for their chosen 'ethic'.

and the systems prototyped in nazi germany then went on to form the basis of the post-ww2 economic order.

and include the liberal world order - the allied - and you come to realise that all three implemented julius wolf’s structural plan.

and wolf’s plan was functionally very similar to moses hess… the father of communism.

all three end up in the same spot. the nazi harboured a racial ethic, the commies a social ethics, and the liberal world order... implemented the same system, very, very slowly until one day.... BAM, the sustainable development goals.

so this ultimately boils down to... installing a global ethic. fuck me, i’m back to where i was in early 2024!

i arrived there probably around january, but went through hans kung and leo swidler a few months later.

swidler’s ‘global ethic’ is BY FAR the more revealing.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-global-ethic

and, wait, moses hess also said in rome and jerusalem that each nation had an ethic - which we can now observe through ISO technical committees - and theodor herzl called for statistics to track adherence.

then lenin came along, and took the 'accounting and control' to the level of the individual, which bogdanov generalised it into early form general systems theory, which through cybernetics eventually delivered us artificial intelligence.

holy moly, it all aligns scarily well.

now we have ISO standardising, while ie the OECD produces normalised data on a global scale, which can be embedded into conditional finance down to the level of the individual through conditional CBDCs.

and everything aligns to moses hess’ ethic, lenin’s ‘accounting and control’, julius wolf’s developments across the entire hess sphere, eduard bernstein’s repivoting society around public-private partnerships where an eventual CSO would dictate the common purpose…

carnegie adopted the same model wrt ‘peace’, while leonard s woolf generalised for political purpose, alfred zimmern implemented through the league of nations, and when the unoted nations came down the road, it was essentially league of nations in institutional form carried forward - except of course they formed the ECOSOC, which serves as the administrative component, organising reinicke’s trisectoral networks which quietly places the foundation-funded NGOs in power…

holy moly, 2 years down the line and the loop closes, almost fully…

bogdanov’s tektology eventually leads to artificial intelligence which runs the evaluative clearing without humans, the conditional CBDCs replace the behavioural settlement, where the ‘ethic’ is determined by the AI, leaving only the structural translation of ‘ethics’ into a ‘cognitive standard’ as the only job left for humanity to eventually do down the line (apart from menial work)… marx in fact stated as much through ‘fragment on machines’, but all of this - ALL of this - is working on the prerequisite that everything is a closed system.

it cannot operate open, because that generates unpredictable data.

rothschild, rockefeller, warburg, carnegie, then a fair distance, then ford, soros, gates, ...

and i have seen NO trace of royal families, 'black nobility' or other committee of 300 inspired nonsense, so if you object, please supply sourcing, ideally primary.

the frame is the tree of life, spinoza capped it at the top, laitman/burstein capped it at the bottom, rothschild and rockefeller realised the clearinghouse was the visible centre of power, but real power operated in the cognitive standards layer… and the soviet union, nazi germany, and the liberal world order ALL implemented the same system just in a different order.

and that system is fundamentally based upon a ‘global ethic’, structured around reorganised money… and it’s exactly this, which conditional CBDCs will close, thus enabling moses hess’s vision. hess, the father of communism.

and i keep arriving at this very same conclusion from different angles, in fact, arguably all essays ive written in 2026 fundamentally have only patched different gaps. i really cannot see this not holding.

the weak points of the system are
1. being seen whole. everything is compartmentalised, and there’s no defense against being seen whole
2. combinatorial explosion through ‘multi-crisis’ modelling.

the retarded system is closed, which means all they will succeed in, is developing the mother of all black swans.

moses hess brought the ‘ethical national identity’, herzl turned that into statistics, lenin into national statistics, bogdanov into a system of control, and down the line, that became artificial intelligence.

flow is calculated through leontief’s input-output analysis, and the entire thing was predicted by marx in ‘fragment on machines’

this wasn’t the outcome of extraordinary capability, it was because in a closed system, all flows eventually returns to source.

to control this flow, he claimed to have determined there was a difference between MCM and CMC, however, this can really only be determined throigh a conditionality check on every transaction, but in reality, it can’t even do that because investing and consumption are not clearly defined, and one often becomes the other in hindsight.

the entire system relies on the claim of total visibility, which of course is incredibly retarded. it’ll lead to the mother of black swans, it’s just a matter of time.

lenin outright stated that ‘accounting and control’ should run through the big banks, without which, the socialist experiement couldn’t come to pass.

and that leads to the final realisation here - julius wolf and eduard bernstein’s public-private-partnership for the ‘social good’ (as judged by an NGO in contemporary terms) in reality is absolutely nothing more but a flow, regulated by that third party.

the third party, itself, is a clearinghouse, mediating between two conflicting partners, judging when and why capital should flow.

the public-private partnership is thus not a governance function - it’s a clearing function. the clearing itself is carried out by a structure, which at its ethical foundation is represented through a ‘civil society organisation’ aka an NGO, whose ‘ethic’ is filtered through various international institutional machinery.

democracy was stripped in the process, but none even focus on that, because the issue of private greed is bound to come up, which of course serves as a bloody good distraction.

oh wait - there’s the input constraint again.

haha yeah so it was even mentioned at the Nuremburg trial post-ww2

yet, this was the model they used, and Keynes thought it was awesome

’They financed extensive purchases in occupied countries through clearing arrangements by which they exacted loans from the occupied countries’

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/count3.asp

the nazis understood the incredible powers of the clearinghouse, just as alfred de rothschild did in 1886, and julius wolf in 1892

alfred de rothschild, 1886:

‘… in fact, the system of the Bankers Clearing House has reached such a high degree of perfection…’

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/own-nothing-control-everything?utm_source=publication-search