yep, that’s it. we have AI, conditional CBDCs, the entire stack from the ‘ethic’ through ISO/OECD/etc and to the end wallet, we have the stranded assets framework, Basel, FSB, we have the social license to operate, and we now have the IMF calling for AI to ‘solve’ the world situation.

the picture is complete.

all fully sourced, none depending on conspiratorial memes, and all documented through the principle that the documents should speak for themselves with minimal editorialising (‘none’ is impossible)

… well, i say that, i didn’t exactly stick to that principle back in 2023 when i wrote ‘the social license to operate’… 🙂

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/esg-and-the-social-license-to-operate?utm_source=publication-search

right, let me guess

digital public infrastructure (digital id, credentials, live surveillance and audits), conditional reconstruction finance (ensuring they stay in line), …

doesnt matter what i throw at it now, this is all grok returns. it’s been like this for a few days, with a few hours break.

anyone else get this?

never mind, doesnt matter….

Nobody reads the February 2024 ISO-IAF communiqué

i was taking today off… right up until the moment i woke up. then, obviously, my brain reminded me that I forgot to relate the Rothschild Health and Security event to ISO TCs…

oh, nice - BBC are back to shilling big pharma

after a bit of jousting, opus 4.7 adaptive agrees with my next essay. they have definitely tightened relative to 4.6, that’s for sure. it really does hedge like a bastard.

anyway… soo… who can spot where moses hess fits into all of this, specifically?

moses hess said every nation had an ‘ethical mission’… and they have succeeded in weaponising it! it’s very clever, will have to say.

it suddenly also makes sense why the technical committee for the meta-standardisation of SDG governance was placed in Denmark - because it’s the model country.

now, with Denmark placed, and we have the UK in charge of TC 309+322 = governance+sustainable finance, we can also place a few other nations… Italy, for instance, through the Vatican is the obvious seat of moral spiritualisation (moses hess: rome and jerusalem, 1862)… but the more interesting question is - who provides the ‘ethics’ which should be processed by Italy, Denmark, the UK and others?

and which ethics?

i mean, look, it’s rothschild and rockefeller at the head table, book it.

but we’re very close to a few realisations here… first off, what’s the worth of a claim of ‘ethical purpose’ when those nations are then led to open border policies, which will dilute their national and thus ethical purpose?

but we’re still short of the fundamental ethic itself. where does that come from? can’t be the SDGs, they werent around when moses hess was alive.

what moses hess, in effect, suggested in rome and jerusalem was that each state became a ‘processing node’. uk, us, denmark, italy, germany, israel, switzerland… they’re all processing nodes.

but it’s not about the processing nodes. it’s about the paths which take the outputs of one, and route them as inputs into the next.

that’s where the clearinghouse node sits. and what matters in that regard is not the nation state nodes, nor the clearinghouse either.

it’s who sets the standards for the nation states. all nation states will be dissolved at the end. all of them.

and all religion will be replaced by the ‘rational’ one world religion in my book - the baha’i faith.

this is leonard s woolf's international government

a world, controlled by international organisations - and not the sovereign state

not the uk. not denmark. not germany. not israel. not the united stated. not china.

the likes of chatham house and the council on foreign relations who engineer all of this

chatham and CFR were both strongly aligned with intelligence in their early years. we can then finish off by tying this back to rothschild (uk) and rockefeller (us), but is there a point?

and this is so obviously also why the CFR is lauding the end of the dollar, while chatham house speaks in glowing terms of ‘multi-polarity’

because the end state in their engineered world is the RIIA and the CFR strategising, and the nation state being a hollow vessel

the ‘multi-polar world order’ is a complete scam, because it’s not about nation states. it’s about leonard s woolf’s international government

the optimal, strategic position to end up in for the likes of the RIIA/CFR, is a world where there are two powers (or more) competing for every position. because that leads to calls for balance, and thus, a clearinghouse.

but there’s only one financial architecture - and their standards underpin everything you see.

Ooh CEPI look for a new CEO, perhaps I should apply.