in the ‘third way’, the ethic eventually becomes the law. you questioning ‘climate change’ means risking your job, etc. you calling into question the efficacy of ‘vaccines = risking your job, and prosecution, etc etc etc
oh wait i wrote on that already
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/law-and-ethics-in-the-total-state?utm_source=publication-search
oh wait i wrote on that already
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/law-and-ethics-in-the-total-state?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
Law and Ethics in the Total State
I didn’t personally learn about this in school.
👍3
also - tony blair first wrote on this bernstein’ian view in 1991 in ‘marxism today’
because all supposed centre-left politicians write in marxist magazines. that’s just normal, just as all centre-right politicians write in fascist mag… oh wait a min-
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-third-way?utm_source=publication-search
because all supposed centre-left politicians write in marxist magazines. that’s just normal, just as all centre-right politicians write in fascist mag… oh wait a min-
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-third-way?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
The Third Way.
Manipulative socialists often misrepresent Thomas Paine, falsely asserting that he spoke of "Human Rights and Responsibilities." However, this is a deliberate distortion; Paine actually emphasized "Human Rights and LEGAL Responsibilities."
😁7
in a mixed economy, you have LEGAL responsibilities
in a 'third way' economy, you have ETHICAL responsibilities... which have a nasty habit of turning into law down the line.
in a 'third way' economy, you have ETHICAL responsibilities... which have a nasty habit of turning into law down the line.
👎1
i suddenly realise that this basically means that without people with reach forwarding (outside of google/twitter/facebook), my follower count would be expected to display gradual decay, with occasional increases when picked up by independent sites
which is exactly what i see.
so perhaps substack are actually not to blame here - in which case i stand corrected. it’s instead the preposterous levels of censorship by platforms which claim to support ‘free speech’
which is exactly what i see.
so perhaps substack are actually not to blame here - in which case i stand corrected. it’s instead the preposterous levels of censorship by platforms which claim to support ‘free speech’
❤4
facebook, google, and twitter all exhibit clear signs of being information clearinghouses - with common rules
👍12
it’s intelligence. fuck intelligence. incidentally, did you know that rothschild family originally were about finance AND intelligence?
🔥9
first off, thank you for this report, however after largely completing the first read (also spending time cross-referening, etc) i have bit of a luxury problem - there's so much ground to cover in this report, i dont even know where to start
i'm pretty well read-up on the clearinghouse and its associated structure, and this document is frankly mind-blowing.
i'm pretty well read-up on the clearinghouse and its associated structure, and this document is frankly mind-blowing.
🔥4
i think, fundamentally, we've been told such an epic lie that half the problem is delivering the information in a way that doesn't come across 'conspiratorial'. and i say that, even with the serious amounts of sources i've been able to drum up
👍8
i think, fundamentally, germany, france and the united kingdom have tried to get this through, each with their own 'ethic', with various levels of success
but what i struggle to reconcile is that all three 'ethics' appear somewhat aligned with a particular book released in the 19th century by the father of a notorious quasi-religion.
but what i struggle to reconcile is that all three 'ethics' appear somewhat aligned with a particular book released in the 19th century by the father of a notorious quasi-religion.
👍7
if i'm right - though i have been wrong before - then this completely changes the history of the 20th century.
🔥4👍2😨1
the 20th century was fundamentally a battle over who would occupy the clearinghouse. and the foundations in the 60s attempted to push the same model through 'the world congress for freedom and democracy'
the communists, nazis, and the liberal world order might have disagreed on the ideology - but not on the clearinghouse
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-fourth-casualty?utm_source=publication-search
the communists, nazis, and the liberal world order might have disagreed on the ideology - but not on the clearinghouse
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-fourth-casualty?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
The Fourth Casualty
Launched on April 17, 1961, the Bay of Pigs invasion was a failed attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro’s communist regime in Cuba.
👍5
Apparently someone is impersonating me through PMs. Not much I can do about that of course.
My personal account is not named ‘esc’, it’s a title I saw on an episode of the simpsons.
So block any personal messages from ‘esc’ unless if course you want to speak to scammers.
My personal account is not named ‘esc’, it’s a title I saw on an episode of the simpsons.
So block any personal messages from ‘esc’ unless if course you want to speak to scammers.
👍8💯3
I obviously appreciate that, but find that almost unreal. I get absolutely no exposure courtesy of the three major intelligence operated fronts.
❤2
I might start data mining this because it would provide a large grained exposure of which essays were not popular with the crooks in intelligence.
👍8💯1
why the heck did the OECD remove this page?
https://web.archive.org/web/20250316093542/https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/leveraging-private-finance-for-development/blended-finance.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20250316093542/https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/leveraging-private-finance-for-development/blended-finance.html
🤔3