now completely censored on google.
past month, not a single link to my substack. not one.
and only 29 hits in total.
past month, not a single link to my substack. not one.
and only 29 hits in total.
🤬10🔥9
right, read the Armstrong essay a 2nd time. here are my thoughts
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/economics/does-becoming-rich-create-a-god-like-self-image/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/economics/does-becoming-rich-create-a-god-like-self-image/
👍18💯2❤1👌1
i just went through his essays, and he in essence looks like he’s trying to ‘sell’ the bullshit i pick apart.
what he, in essence, is promoting, is a global ‘precautionary principle’ that doesnt even factor in ruined lives, and catastrophically declining living standards.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/settled-science/comments
what he, in essence, is promoting, is a global ‘precautionary principle’ that doesnt even factor in ruined lives, and catastrophically declining living standards.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/settled-science/comments
👍15
in his profile, he describes himself as a theoretical physicist, but having read his essays, i find it more than a little odd he’s so outright dismissive of science.
🤔2🔥1
technically speaking, ordoliberalism suggests the NGFS pathway goes first
also, IIASA doesn’t technically measure - that’s GEOSS and similar. IIASA models.
also, IIASA doesn’t technically measure - that’s GEOSS and similar. IIASA models.
👍4
i suppose we could also include
TCFD/ISSB for climate - they feed Basel capital requirements
TNFD for biodiversity - they feed the same Basel framework
TCFD/ISSB for climate - they feed Basel capital requirements
TNFD for biodiversity - they feed the same Basel framework
👍5