‘climate science’ is not science

science is falsifiable

when things come out better than expected, it’s because of the ‘proactive stance of the climate science community’
when it’s worse than expected, it’s because ‘we do not do enough’

under no condition is ‘climate science’ falsifiable. hence, it isn’t science.

hahahahaha

it’s complete horse manure. who selects these ‘approximations’?

i assume that, if they’re wrong, the ‘climate science’ community hold up their hands and accept they were wrong?

oh wait, they don’t?

in other words, even the 'approximations' are unfalsifiable - because they sit within the same models.

it’s fraud.

oh wait - their ‘approximations’… they’re by and large scale invariant. hahahahahahaha

if ‘climate science’ cared about its reputation as a legit branch of science, then why was no climate scientists fired for gross misconduct post-Climategate?

and why did they lie about it being an ‘email controversy’?

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/climategate

funny how people who are certain ‘climate change’ is real fail to reply to related, foundational questions.

summary essays of my essays on climate change and environment

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/settled-science

PDF

the IPCC selects the ‘valid’ climate scenarios in exactly the same way as the NGFS SAC will select the ‘valid’ financial scenarios

both the IPCC and NGFS SAC operate through input constraint

included that in the essay, and here’s the PDF update

‘Socialism Is Targeting The Foundations That Made America Great’???????

Zero Hedge is bought and paid for.

the foundations are the ones pushing socialism.

right, read the Armstrong essay a 2nd time. here are my thoughts

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/economics/does-becoming-rich-create-a-god-like-self-image/

looks legit