Not forgetting… “he would stick to the government’s fiscal rules and not deviate from Labour’s 2024 election manifesto”

The same ‘manifesto’ which was ripped up and used as toilet paper practically on day one of Starmer’s jolly Fabian government, that is.

Trust them. They count on you being a sucker.

'Digital has it now'

back then, my dad and his colleague always facetiously added 'but you can't have it'

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-09-05-fi-13593-story.html

Happy not interdependence day

the pathetic thing about the hyper-exaggerated ‘climate change’ narrative being incessantly shilled here in the uk, whether it relates to the world cup or tour de france is that if things were truly accelerating that rapidly out of control, there would be absolutely no point in even trying to attempt to stop it

but, rather, rothschild and rockefeller, and their associated cronies, have decided that we in the west have to self-destroy in order to… er, what exactly?

‘climate science’ is not science

science is falsifiable

when things come out better than expected, it’s because of the ‘proactive stance of the climate science community’
when it’s worse than expected, it’s because ‘we do not do enough’

under no condition is ‘climate science’ falsifiable. hence, it isn’t science.

hahahahaha

it’s complete horse manure. who selects these ‘approximations’?

i assume that, if they’re wrong, the ‘climate science’ community hold up their hands and accept they were wrong?

oh wait, they don’t?

in other words, even the 'approximations' are unfalsifiable - because they sit within the same models.

it’s fraud.

oh wait - their ‘approximations’… they’re by and large scale invariant. hahahahahahaha

if ‘climate science’ cared about its reputation as a legit branch of science, then why was no climate scientists fired for gross misconduct post-Climategate?

and why did they lie about it being an ‘email controversy’?

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/climategate

funny how people who are certain ‘climate change’ is real fail to reply to related, foundational questions.

summary essays of my essays on climate change and environment

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/settled-science

PDF

the IPCC selects the ‘valid’ climate scenarios in exactly the same way as the NGFS SAC will select the ‘valid’ financial scenarios

both the IPCC and NGFS SAC operate through input constraint

included that in the essay, and here’s the PDF update

‘Socialism Is Targeting The Foundations That Made America Great’???????

Zero Hedge is bought and paid for.

the foundations are the ones pushing socialism.

right, read the Armstrong essay a 2nd time. here are my thoughts

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/economics/does-becoming-rich-create-a-god-like-self-image/

looks legit