i suppose its worth adding that the PEP in essence was a fabian offshoot... the same fabians who in 2023 suggested shifting power of financial policy into a - yes - clearinghouse

this would shield it from voter wishes, which of course is the entire idea

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/in-tandem?utm_source=publication-search

it's the BIS, it's the Bank of England, it's the clearinghouse, and Rothschild and Rockefeller organise the contemporary convenings which set future direction through UN/EU/etc technical committees which outline 20-year policy objectives for the secretariat/commission/... to integrate.

it really is that simple. they're just shifting it into place in slightly different ways per territory, but it's the same plan.

same goes for digital public infrastructure which is being pushed through health in europe, development aid in the third world, war in ukraine/gaza/..., promises of 'financial inclusion' in india and other regions... it's all the same think. it's the digital control grid which supports the clearinghouse structure - which also is super-handy, as the objective is to shift the clearinghouses into federated AI from top to bottom, leaving only a handful of 'navigators of spaceship earth' to set the course

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/08/world/david-de-rothschild-modern-explorers

and as for the 'perhaps its for our good' argument - they never bothered telling you about them doing this. you'd have to be gullible as all hell to believe they're in it to help you.

Yes, burnham - a Fabian - is considering miliband (a Fabian), Mahmoid (a Fabian), and streeting (a fabian) for the role in the treasury.

Doing things differently indeed. Different rhetoric. Same clearinghouse installation procedure, it would just have arrived later under Starmer (a Fabian).

It doesn’t fucking matter which Fabian parasite is in number 10. They’re all the god damn same.

And most high traction influencers and high profile journalists damn well know.

I swear if I have to listen to one more episode of triggernometry where they discuss Fabian parasites versus one another as if they’re any different……

Not forgetting… “he would stick to the government’s fiscal rules and not deviate from Labour’s 2024 election manifesto”

The same ‘manifesto’ which was ripped up and used as toilet paper practically on day one of Starmer’s jolly Fabian government, that is.

Trust them. They count on you being a sucker.

'Digital has it now'

back then, my dad and his colleague always facetiously added 'but you can't have it'

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-09-05-fi-13593-story.html

Happy not interdependence day

the pathetic thing about the hyper-exaggerated ‘climate change’ narrative being incessantly shilled here in the uk, whether it relates to the world cup or tour de france is that if things were truly accelerating that rapidly out of control, there would be absolutely no point in even trying to attempt to stop it

but, rather, rothschild and rockefeller, and their associated cronies, have decided that we in the west have to self-destroy in order to… er, what exactly?

‘climate science’ is not science

science is falsifiable

when things come out better than expected, it’s because of the ‘proactive stance of the climate science community’
when it’s worse than expected, it’s because ‘we do not do enough’

under no condition is ‘climate science’ falsifiable. hence, it isn’t science.

hahahahaha

it’s complete horse manure. who selects these ‘approximations’?

i assume that, if they’re wrong, the ‘climate science’ community hold up their hands and accept they were wrong?

oh wait, they don’t?

in other words, even the 'approximations' are unfalsifiable - because they sit within the same models.

it’s fraud.

oh wait - their ‘approximations’… they’re by and large scale invariant. hahahahahahaha

if ‘climate science’ cared about its reputation as a legit branch of science, then why was no climate scientists fired for gross misconduct post-Climategate?

and why did they lie about it being an ‘email controversy’?

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/climategate

funny how people who are certain ‘climate change’ is real fail to reply to related, foundational questions.

summary essays of my essays on climate change and environment

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/settled-science

PDF

the IPCC selects the ‘valid’ climate scenarios in exactly the same way as the NGFS SAC will select the ‘valid’ financial scenarios

both the IPCC and NGFS SAC operate through input constraint

included that in the essay, and here’s the PDF update

‘Socialism Is Targeting The Foundations That Made America Great’???????

Zero Hedge is bought and paid for.

the foundations are the ones pushing socialism.