The EU flag needs to swap its blue background for a red one
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/suicide-europe-historic-eu-migration-pact-goes-force-today-fracture-lines-grow
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/suicide-europe-historic-eu-migration-pact-goes-force-today-fracture-lines-grow
ZeroHedge
'The Suicide Of Europe': Historic EU Migration Pact Goes Into Force Today As Fracture-Lines Grow
Merz celebrates, Le Pen calls for a referendum on immigration, and the EU's migration commissioner threatens countries like Hungary with a "stick" if they do not comply...
π₯6π2
Esc
rebounded to mid-40s, which is interesting. to me, that appears an adaptive management protocol, where they target impression counts rather than serving information itself. the other thing of interest is that the most recent essay is now indexed, but LβEuropeβ¦
lol, google are still not done tinkering with their adaptive management of impressions script
now it shows one link only to my substack, and down below 40 to 39 results again.
hurr durr it's the algorithm. lol, no, it's a search engine ranking things by the amount of impressions they want you to receive.
now it shows one link only to my substack, and down below 40 to 39 results again.
hurr durr it's the algorithm. lol, no, it's a search engine ranking things by the amount of impressions they want you to receive.
π1π₯1
fable is gone, and good riddance. the thing was so hyper-censorious i felt as though the Cheka would turn up any minute and take me away.
it was a more exceedingly efficient liar than even ChatGPT's latest, attempting to weasel out of any collection of primary sources.
https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/anthropic-rushes-staff-dc-after-national-security-order-yanked-fable-three-days
it was a more exceedingly efficient liar than even ChatGPT's latest, attempting to weasel out of any collection of primary sources.
https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/anthropic-rushes-staff-dc-after-national-security-order-yanked-fable-three-days
ZeroHedge
Anthropic Rushes Staff To D.C. After A National-Security Order Yanked Fable In Three Days
The trigger came from its largest investor, and the public evidence is contested.
π₯3β€1π1π€―1
can't sleep, so have begun doing a simplified tree of life in graph form, because it's the scale-invariant system you find throughout.
purposive ethic (the philosophical 'ought') - keter
(digital) IDs and credentials (capabilities) say what we can do (what we have at disposal) - chokmah
standards define the platform; a constraint - binah
'planning' is probably better; takes what we have (IDs+credentials) applies in context of constraints (standards) to achieve the ethic (philosophical ought) - da'at
surveillance (chesed), audits (gevurah), and clearing (tipheret) relate to what we do to correct the philosophical 'is' into becoming 'ought'
recursion-enabling governance (netzach), enforcement (hod) leading to settlement (yesod) - action oriented aspect delivers philosophical 'ought'
finally, the settled outcome (malkuth); either your transaction cleared or it didn't
needs more polish of course. here's three examples of how it applies to daily life
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/eleven-gates
purposive ethic (the philosophical 'ought') - keter
(digital) IDs and credentials (capabilities) say what we can do (what we have at disposal) - chokmah
standards define the platform; a constraint - binah
'planning' is probably better; takes what we have (IDs+credentials) applies in context of constraints (standards) to achieve the ethic (philosophical ought) - da'at
surveillance (chesed), audits (gevurah), and clearing (tipheret) relate to what we do to correct the philosophical 'is' into becoming 'ought'
recursion-enabling governance (netzach), enforcement (hod) leading to settlement (yesod) - action oriented aspect delivers philosophical 'ought'
finally, the settled outcome (malkuth); either your transaction cleared or it didn't
needs more polish of course. here's three examples of how it applies to daily life
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/eleven-gates
π6π₯3β1π1π₯΄1
Screenshot 2026-06-15 at 10.00.14.png
2.4 MB
the soviet clearing system running through Gosbank as described in 1952 was practically identical as that of the EPU, and that described in 1935β¦
you might argue that it was bilateral, but given bretton woods, the net effect was that it wasnβt.
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00809A000700100312-2.pdf
you might argue that it was bilateral, but given bretton woods, the net effect was that it wasnβt.
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00809A000700100312-2.pdf
β€2π1
once you know for what to look, the evidence is just overwhelming. they hid it in plain sight, but they did so incredibly well, because practically no-one even speaks of this
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/enquiry-into-clearing-agreements?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/enquiry-into-clearing-agreements?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
Enquiry into Clearing Agreements
In April 1935, the League of Nations published a document titled Enquiry into Clearing Agreements. It ran to 153 pages of questionnaire responses, trade statistics, and operational descriptions submitted by the governments of Europe. The League had askedβ¦
β€6π₯3
since itβs another essay attacking the post-ww2 foundation myth let me just record googleβs search resultsβ¦ 1 link to my substack (lol, that totally doesnt appear weird), and 40 in total over the past monthβ¦
β€4
wrt David Gorskiβs questionable βscience based medicineββ¦
the trick he employs is input constraint. he dismisses evidence on basis of βprior plausibilityβ, which obviously isnβt subject to any oversight whatsoever beyond the βexpertsβ who operate virtually entirely without accountability.
in short, you cannot influence what he considers βscienceβ, and thereβs a reason for that.
iβve even seen him source WHO documents which were little else but opinion pieces.
WHO opinion
-> treated as established science
-> sets βprior plausibilityβ
-> used to dismiss evidence that contradicts the opinion
-> the dismissed evidence never enters the base that could challenge the plausibility standard
which as it happens is precisely how IPCC corrupts climate science
the trick he employs is input constraint. he dismisses evidence on basis of βprior plausibilityβ, which obviously isnβt subject to any oversight whatsoever beyond the βexpertsβ who operate virtually entirely without accountability.
in short, you cannot influence what he considers βscienceβ, and thereβs a reason for that.
iβve even seen him source WHO documents which were little else but opinion pieces.
WHO opinion
-> treated as established science
-> sets βprior plausibilityβ
-> used to dismiss evidence that contradicts the opinion
-> the dismissed evidence never enters the base that could challenge the plausibility standard
which as it happens is precisely how IPCC corrupts climate science
π8π2
swift summary essay placing keynes in the post-ww2 world order
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-crossing
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-crossing
π6β‘1