1.74K subscribers
3.03K photos
3 videos
184 files
1.61K links
Download Telegram
yup, google's 're-indexing' has levelled out impression counts of google vs facebook and twitter.

google manage impression counts, not information. that's why it's gone so sh-t.
πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1
Ethics
Standards
Clearing
Settlement
Outcome
πŸ‘5πŸ”₯5
Esc
rebounded to mid-40s, which is interesting. to me, that appears an adaptive management protocol, where they target impression counts rather than serving information itself. the other thing of interest is that the most recent essay is now indexed, but L’Europe…
lol, google are still not done tinkering with their adaptive management of impressions script

now it shows one link only to my substack, and down below 40 to 39 results again.

hurr durr it's the algorithm. lol, no, it's a search engine ranking things by the amount of impressions they want you to receive.
πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1
over the past month, yandex's censorship... 13 hits, and 1 essay from my substack.

yandex's censorship is no less than google's. don't count on russia riding to help.
πŸ‘16πŸ”₯1😴1
fable is gone, and good riddance. the thing was so hyper-censorious i felt as though the Cheka would turn up any minute and take me away.

it was a more exceedingly efficient liar than even ChatGPT's latest, attempting to weasel out of any collection of primary sources.

https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/anthropic-rushes-staff-dc-after-national-security-order-yanked-fable-three-days
πŸ”₯3❀1πŸ‘1🀯1
can't sleep, so have begun doing a simplified tree of life in graph form, because it's the scale-invariant system you find throughout.

purposive ethic (the philosophical 'ought') - keter

(digital) IDs and credentials (capabilities) say what we can do (what we have at disposal) - chokmah

standards define the platform; a constraint - binah

'planning' is probably better; takes what we have (IDs+credentials) applies in context of constraints (standards) to achieve the ethic (philosophical ought) - da'at

surveillance (chesed), audits (gevurah), and clearing (tipheret) relate to what we do to correct the philosophical 'is' into becoming 'ought'

recursion-enabling governance (netzach), enforcement (hod) leading to settlement (yesod) - action oriented aspect delivers philosophical 'ought'

finally, the settled outcome (malkuth); either your transaction cleared or it didn't

needs more polish of course. here's three examples of how it applies to daily life

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/eleven-gates
πŸ‘6πŸ”₯3✍1πŸ‘1πŸ₯΄1
I counted 5 planes in the sky simultaneously doing what it is that they do this past Saturday here in the south east.

you know, perhaps it’s just me, but i definitely do not recall this from my childhood
πŸ’―33πŸ‘7😒2
Screenshot 2026-06-15 at 10.00.14.png
2.4 MB
the soviet clearing system running through Gosbank as described in 1952 was practically identical as that of the EPU, and that described in 1935…

you might argue that it was bilateral, but given bretton woods, the net effect was that it wasn’t.


https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00809A000700100312-2.pdf
❀2πŸ‘1
on Wilhelm Ropke’s post-ww2 Third Way

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-post-war-third-way
πŸ‘5πŸ‘Œ1
since it’s another essay attacking the post-ww2 foundation myth let me just record google’s search results… 1 link to my substack (lol, that totally doesnt appear weird), and 40 in total over the past month…
❀4
wrt David Gorski’s questionable β€˜science based medicine’…

the trick he employs is input constraint. he dismisses evidence on basis of β€˜prior plausibility’, which obviously isn’t subject to any oversight whatsoever beyond the β€˜experts’ who operate virtually entirely without accountability.

in short, you cannot influence what he considers β€˜science’, and there’s a reason for that.

i’ve even seen him source WHO documents which were little else but opinion pieces.

WHO opinion
-> treated as established science
-> sets β€˜prior plausibility’
-> used to dismiss evidence that contradicts the opinion
-> the dismissed evidence never enters the base that could challenge the plausibility standard

which as it happens is precisely how IPCC corrupts climate science
πŸ‘8πŸ‘2
i’ll let you know if the BIS bites
😁8πŸ‘€1
lol, a search engine with less than 1% market share yields around half the impressions served by each of the three giants

having fun, intelligence crooks?
😁10
Oh wow bing is even worse than Yandex - 8 search results and 2 notes, no essays over the past month.
πŸ‘Ž3
Not even a note on Baidu. See, what’s interesting is that the censorship is consistent across the platforms controlled by the alleged adversaries.
πŸ€”9😁1