blair also pretty much stated as much

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-third-way?utm_source=publication-search

ok… so the end point is fixed, but we can choose how to get there?

so it’s a kind of spiritual ‘third way’?

like the political 'third way', where economic conditionality in effect subtly steers decisions

ok… so after spending 1 1/2 hours reading laitman’s book of zohar… the alignment is almost perfect.

https://files.kabbalahmedia.info/files/eng_t_ml-sefer-zohar.pdf

Reminder that the Fabian parasites still are slow walked communists

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ministry-truth-uk-government-block-false-information-during-crisis-events

yup, google's 're-indexing' has levelled out impression counts of google vs facebook and twitter.

google manage impression counts, not information. that's why it's gone so sh-t.

Ethics
Standards
Clearing
Settlement
Outcome

The EU flag needs to swap its blue background for a red one

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/suicide-europe-historic-eu-migration-pact-goes-force-today-fracture-lines-grow

over the past month, yandex's censorship... 13 hits, and 1 essay from my substack.

yandex's censorship is no less than google's. don't count on russia riding to help.

fable is gone, and good riddance. the thing was so hyper-censorious i felt as though the Cheka would turn up any minute and take me away.

it was a more exceedingly efficient liar than even ChatGPT's latest, attempting to weasel out of any collection of primary sources.

https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/anthropic-rushes-staff-dc-after-national-security-order-yanked-fable-three-days

can't sleep, so have begun doing a simplified tree of life in graph form, because it's the scale-invariant system you find throughout.

purposive ethic (the philosophical 'ought') - keter

(digital) IDs and credentials (capabilities) say what we can do (what we have at disposal) - chokmah

standards define the platform; a constraint - binah

'planning' is probably better; takes what we have (IDs+credentials) applies in context of constraints (standards) to achieve the ethic (philosophical ought) - da'at

surveillance (chesed), audits (gevurah), and clearing (tipheret) relate to what we do to correct the philosophical 'is' into becoming 'ought'

recursion-enabling governance (netzach), enforcement (hod) leading to settlement (yesod) - action oriented aspect delivers philosophical 'ought'

finally, the settled outcome (malkuth); either your transaction cleared or it didn't

needs more polish of course. here's three examples of how it applies to daily life

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/eleven-gates

I counted 5 planes in the sky simultaneously doing what it is that they do this past Saturday here in the south east.

you know, perhaps it’s just me, but i definitely do not recall this from my childhood

the soviet clearing system running through Gosbank as described in 1952 was practically identical as that of the EPU, and that described in 1935…

you might argue that it was bilateral, but given bretton woods, the net effect was that it wasn’t.


https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00809A000700100312-2.pdf

once you know for what to look, the evidence is just overwhelming. they hid it in plain sight, but they did so incredibly well, because practically no-one even speaks of this

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/enquiry-into-clearing-agreements?utm_source=publication-search

on Wilhelm Ropke’s post-ww2 Third Way

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-post-war-third-way

PDF

wrt David Gorski’s questionable ‘science based medicine’…

the trick he employs is input constraint. he dismisses evidence on basis of ‘prior plausibility’, which obviously isn’t subject to any oversight whatsoever beyond the ‘experts’ who operate virtually entirely without accountability.

in short, you cannot influence what he considers ‘science’, and there’s a reason for that.

i’ve even seen him source WHO documents which were little else but opinion pieces.

WHO opinion
-> treated as established science
-> sets ‘prior plausibility’
-> used to dismiss evidence that contradicts the opinion
-> the dismissed evidence never enters the base that could challenge the plausibility standard

which as it happens is precisely how IPCC corrupts climate science