isnt it amazing how foundation funding, in essence, aligns pretty much exactly with the revised history i’ve gradually arrived at?

i didn’t even consult the rockefeller annuals for years. but virtually every subversive initiative is funded by rockefeller - especially rockefeller - ford, soros, gates, bloomberg, carnegie…

rothschild are different. they draw the map. everyone else fills in the blanks on their behalf. they dont occupy the clearinghouses, they help establish the standards for them.

… 53… lol

... 52...

iirc, i was around the 100+ mark not long ago - with fewer subscribers, of course.

lol, going too fast to be coincidental

50

ok, the next essay will be highly controversial. let’s see if we can hit 40 by the weekend.

almost out of runway, you fucking crooks

this conference… explains so much.

https://dn760004.eu.archive.org/0/items/convegno-scienze-morali-storiche-europa/ConvegnoScienzeMoraliStoricheEuropa_text.pdf

another, yeah, pretty controversial essay

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-second-volta-congress

PDF

holy sh-

here’s Goebbels saying it’s neither left nor right! it’s ‘third way’.

right, let’s have a look… here’s Goebbel’s speech from 1933

https://books.google.nl/books?id=wHjn252YT-wC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

anyway, so Gusejnova in essence confirms - with higher fidelity - my research in the social and political sphere, but she doesn't discuss the central mechanism itself; ethics-standards-clearing-settlement-outcome.

and it went through the Cambridge peer-review process!

that's... pretty much the best possible confirmation i could have asked for!

she doesn’t discuss the Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (1942 nazi report), which is interesting but then again, there’s so little discussion of it online it beggars belief

https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/98638/1/9781107120624book_dg.pdf

Carnegie funding.

oh, every story needs a Warburg funder and a Rothschild reference

a little bit surprised about the lack of mention of julius wolf and eduard bernstein, but then again - she doesn’t operate within economics.

in my book, those two in essence are pivotal. wolf created the mechanism (installed at the BIS in 1930), and bernstein framed it around an ‘ethic’.

wolf also extensively wrote on european integration since certainly 1904

anyway, in context of this now being confirmed through Cambridge peer review, i suppose it should strike me as strange it doesn’t gain traction - especially in light of keynes clearly taking the 1940/1942 framework further. but then again, arguably this is regime threatening so no wonder it’d be censored to hell and back.

reminds me of this conversation with grok…

https://t.me/escapekey/1809

also, Gusejnova arrived at much the same point as i - arendt, in essence, does competent analysis in ‘origins of totalitarianism’… and then seals off the debate, stopping you looking for the common pattern.


https://t.me/escapekey/4572

… 47…