contemporary politicians are not labour or tory, they're ‘third way’

they position themselves different in terms of rhetoric and route of implementation - but the ultimate objective is identical

latest full collection

t/y Litoralis

https://transfer.it/t/6uCsLag10bRA

‘the third way’ in essence is cancer, gradually destroying society from within

you don’t realise until down the road, because things look normal, and no-one can quite point out what’s wrong, because in ways, it looks like socialism, and in other ways, it looks like capitalism.

so… kalergi wrote about ethics… then politics… and then hantos turns that into economics… then the 1932 volta congress with hantos, rosenberg and schacht compiled the idea into volume form… then funk, hunke, cloidus etc developed the idea further in 1942... and then the treaty of rome turned it into the eventual european union...


https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/Hyperethik/coudenhove_kalergi-ethik_und_hyperethik_1922_text.pdf

but they still needed an ethic - that was to be post-ww2 peace, eventually environmentalism... that replaced the nazi racial ethic and the soviet collective duty...

the treaty of rome was signed in 1957 - the volta congress took place in 1932.

25 years. and the congress was held in rome.

there sure are a lot of concidence here.

and i haven’t even spoken of the parallels when it comes to the german central bank

the same central bank which the english and americans insisted on reforming in the late 1920s during Dawe’s turned the Young plan…

over here

the German government agreed to restructure its central bank under Allied supervision

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/black-tuesday?utm_source=publication-search

isnt it amazing how foundation funding, in essence, aligns pretty much exactly with the revised history i’ve gradually arrived at?

i didn’t even consult the rockefeller annuals for years. but virtually every subversive initiative is funded by rockefeller - especially rockefeller - ford, soros, gates, bloomberg, carnegie…

rothschild are different. they draw the map. everyone else fills in the blanks on their behalf. they dont occupy the clearinghouses, they help establish the standards for them.

… 53… lol

... 52...

iirc, i was around the 100+ mark not long ago - with fewer subscribers, of course.

lol, going too fast to be coincidental

50

ok, the next essay will be highly controversial. let’s see if we can hit 40 by the weekend.

almost out of runway, you fucking crooks

this conference… explains so much.

https://dn760004.eu.archive.org/0/items/convegno-scienze-morali-storiche-europa/ConvegnoScienzeMoraliStoricheEuropa_text.pdf

another, yeah, pretty controversial essay

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-second-volta-congress

PDF

holy sh-

here’s Goebbels saying it’s neither left nor right! it’s ‘third way’.

right, let’s have a look… here’s Goebbel’s speech from 1933

https://books.google.nl/books?id=wHjn252YT-wC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

anyway, so Gusejnova in essence confirms - with higher fidelity - my research in the social and political sphere, but she doesn't discuss the central mechanism itself; ethics-standards-clearing-settlement-outcome.

and it went through the Cambridge peer-review process!

that's... pretty much the best possible confirmation i could have asked for!

she doesn’t discuss the Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (1942 nazi report), which is interesting but then again, there’s so little discussion of it online it beggars belief

https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/98638/1/9781107120624book_dg.pdf