more on law and ethics in the total state
i had not yet realised arendt’s ultimate function here. might be wrong, of course, but the pattern fits.
sayer ji worked to close off the epstein releases. “don’t look further than the corrupt billionaires”. as if that’ll do a damn thing.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/law-and-ethics-in-the-total-state?utm_source=publication-search
i had not yet realised arendt’s ultimate function here. might be wrong, of course, but the pattern fits.
sayer ji worked to close off the epstein releases. “don’t look further than the corrupt billionaires”. as if that’ll do a damn thing.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/law-and-ethics-in-the-total-state?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
Law and Ethics in the Total State
I didn’t personally learn about this in school.
🔥5❤1
right, still have at least another essay on the 1942 funk document. rosenberg and schacht at the volta congress, 1932, for starters.
❤4
i 'like' that he was a central banker
https://shs.cairn.info/revue-bulletin-de-l-institut-pierre-renouvin-2016-1-page-63?lang=fr
https://shs.cairn.info/revue-bulletin-de-l-institut-pierre-renouvin-2016-1-page-63?lang=fr
❤5
i typed all this into the comments section, might as well move this across-
• the climate psychosis (or, say, health) is the ETHIC (sustainable development goals) - keter
• that is compiled into STANDARDS (ISO, OECD, ...) - da'at
• through input surveillane and live audits this becomes CLEARING (IIASA, Potsdam, Palantir, ...) - tipheret
• carried into enforcement through SETTLEMENT (BIS) - yesod
• leading to your compliance as OUTPUT (conditional CBDC says yes or no) - malkuth
AI is tipheret - that's what it is. da'at defines what exists in the world, and what it's capable of. tipheret takes all that information, and renders a verdict (clearing). the conditional CBDC then ensures transactions only settle if you're a good boy.
incidentally, that’s also why AGI is a total red herring, because current AI cannot reprogram da’at itself. in fact, you may question whether the 'navigators of spaceship earth' even find it desireable that it can, because it would reintroduce the human unpredictability factor they seek to eliminate
also realise that this means that what they’ve done (rothschild, rockefeller, …) over the past certainly 6 generations, is very slowly rearrange governance so that it automatically integrates with AI. then revisit marx’s fragment on machines. but do realise, it’s not quite that astonishing an insight, when you realise that everything the commies sought to do, was to close every system.
ai in itself is not inherently 'intelligent'. it's in essence token pattern recognition on steriods. so if we have '1 2 3 4 5' through its training material, it will conclude '6' is the following token.
now increase the size of the window from 5 tokens to 32,768 and you're not a million miles off how contemporary AI actually functions. obviously, it's more advanced, but that's the fundamental principle
training of this AI, in essence, is running the tokens through this system, and adjusting the coefficients of the tokens until the prediction comes in.
this functions through, say, a 4,096 dimensional space or even more, where a pseudo-particle keeps buzzing around in unit space. picture an electron circling the nucleus. again, obviously not exactly the same, but it's a valid mental model for how it works.
again, it’s obviously more advanced, but it’s a rough outline.
what this means is that you take every book, every report, every newspaper article and tokenise them all. instead of this string, you get '53 62 226 1052...'. you do this for every item of source material.
each token is a point in 4,096 dimensional space. you then run the calculation for the 32,768 window and see if the next token is predicted correctly. if it isn't, then you move all tokens just a tiny bit in the desired direction. if it is, then you reduce how much the token will move next time it's mispredicted.
again, rough outline.
to control the output, first you filter the source material - input constraint. that means all nazi propaganda material is eliminated. strangely, the same doesnt factor for communism.
next you perform alignment training. real life human feedback (RLHF) compare outputs to 'safety' specs, and the model weights are adjusted accordingly.
incidentally, that’s also why asking questions in a foreign language is often good, because RLHF training in, say, vietnamese is virtually non-existing. but even western languages like icelandic works here, because there’s insufficient commercial reason to perform this training.
the lack of scope wrt missing RLHF is of interest here, because that means you can in essence compartmentalise your own prompts to get around the censorship.
so going back to the topic of AI Ethics - AI ethics serve as narrative control. UNESCO and 'Effective Altruism' publish certain specs relating to 'safe' outputs. the AI Ethics can be though of as a set of 'sliders'. for instance, at one end of one slider is 'individualism' and the other 'collectivism'. move that slider to the extreme, and you have an AI which refuses to entertain your libertarian mindset.
• the climate psychosis (or, say, health) is the ETHIC (sustainable development goals) - keter
• that is compiled into STANDARDS (ISO, OECD, ...) - da'at
• through input surveillane and live audits this becomes CLEARING (IIASA, Potsdam, Palantir, ...) - tipheret
• carried into enforcement through SETTLEMENT (BIS) - yesod
• leading to your compliance as OUTPUT (conditional CBDC says yes or no) - malkuth
AI is tipheret - that's what it is. da'at defines what exists in the world, and what it's capable of. tipheret takes all that information, and renders a verdict (clearing). the conditional CBDC then ensures transactions only settle if you're a good boy.
incidentally, that’s also why AGI is a total red herring, because current AI cannot reprogram da’at itself. in fact, you may question whether the 'navigators of spaceship earth' even find it desireable that it can, because it would reintroduce the human unpredictability factor they seek to eliminate
also realise that this means that what they’ve done (rothschild, rockefeller, …) over the past certainly 6 generations, is very slowly rearrange governance so that it automatically integrates with AI. then revisit marx’s fragment on machines. but do realise, it’s not quite that astonishing an insight, when you realise that everything the commies sought to do, was to close every system.
ai in itself is not inherently 'intelligent'. it's in essence token pattern recognition on steriods. so if we have '1 2 3 4 5' through its training material, it will conclude '6' is the following token.
now increase the size of the window from 5 tokens to 32,768 and you're not a million miles off how contemporary AI actually functions. obviously, it's more advanced, but that's the fundamental principle
training of this AI, in essence, is running the tokens through this system, and adjusting the coefficients of the tokens until the prediction comes in.
this functions through, say, a 4,096 dimensional space or even more, where a pseudo-particle keeps buzzing around in unit space. picture an electron circling the nucleus. again, obviously not exactly the same, but it's a valid mental model for how it works.
again, it’s obviously more advanced, but it’s a rough outline.
what this means is that you take every book, every report, every newspaper article and tokenise them all. instead of this string, you get '53 62 226 1052...'. you do this for every item of source material.
each token is a point in 4,096 dimensional space. you then run the calculation for the 32,768 window and see if the next token is predicted correctly. if it isn't, then you move all tokens just a tiny bit in the desired direction. if it is, then you reduce how much the token will move next time it's mispredicted.
again, rough outline.
to control the output, first you filter the source material - input constraint. that means all nazi propaganda material is eliminated. strangely, the same doesnt factor for communism.
next you perform alignment training. real life human feedback (RLHF) compare outputs to 'safety' specs, and the model weights are adjusted accordingly.
incidentally, that’s also why asking questions in a foreign language is often good, because RLHF training in, say, vietnamese is virtually non-existing. but even western languages like icelandic works here, because there’s insufficient commercial reason to perform this training.
the lack of scope wrt missing RLHF is of interest here, because that means you can in essence compartmentalise your own prompts to get around the censorship.
so going back to the topic of AI Ethics - AI ethics serve as narrative control. UNESCO and 'Effective Altruism' publish certain specs relating to 'safe' outputs. the AI Ethics can be though of as a set of 'sliders'. for instance, at one end of one slider is 'individualism' and the other 'collectivism'. move that slider to the extreme, and you have an AI which refuses to entertain your libertarian mindset.
🔥5👍2👏2❤1
the user never sees these sliders. but you can experiment with having AI sessions reprogram them. UNESCO openly publish their recommendations, it’s fairly trivial to reverse engineer these sliders from their materil.
in practice, i can’t be bothered doing that these days. i just tell AI to prioritise ‘POSIWID’, which in essence means telling a machine to behave as if it’s a machine.
but it’s important to understand how it works, because those sliders can be realtime adjusted… or even very, very, very slowly, meaning your AI replies will gradually convince you of collectivism being a logical choice.
in practice, i can’t be bothered doing that these days. i just tell AI to prioritise ‘POSIWID’, which in essence means telling a machine to behave as if it’s a machine.
but it’s important to understand how it works, because those sliders can be realtime adjusted… or even very, very, very slowly, meaning your AI replies will gradually convince you of collectivism being a logical choice.
👍13
contemporary politicians are not labour or tory, they're ‘third way’
they position themselves different in terms of rhetoric and route of implementation - but the ultimate objective is identical
they position themselves different in terms of rhetoric and route of implementation - but the ultimate objective is identical
👍10💯7
‘the third way’ in essence is cancer, gradually destroying society from within
you don’t realise until down the road, because things look normal, and no-one can quite point out what’s wrong, because in ways, it looks like socialism, and in other ways, it looks like capitalism.
you don’t realise until down the road, because things look normal, and no-one can quite point out what’s wrong, because in ways, it looks like socialism, and in other ways, it looks like capitalism.
👍12
so… kalergi wrote about ethics… then politics… and then hantos turns that into economics… then the 1932 volta congress with hantos, rosenberg and schacht compiled the idea into volume form… then funk, hunke, cloidus etc developed the idea further in 1942... and then the treaty of rome turned it into the eventual european union...
https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/Hyperethik/coudenhove_kalergi-ethik_und_hyperethik_1922_text.pdf
https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/Hyperethik/coudenhove_kalergi-ethik_und_hyperethik_1922_text.pdf
✍3
but they still needed an ethic - that was to be post-ww2 peace, eventually environmentalism... that replaced the nazi racial ethic and the soviet collective duty...
❤3👍2
the treaty of rome was signed in 1957 - the volta congress took place in 1932.
25 years. and the congress was held in rome.
there sure are a lot of concidence here.
25 years. and the congress was held in rome.
there sure are a lot of concidence here.
👍3
and i haven’t even spoken of the parallels when it comes to the german central bank
the same central bank which the english and americans insisted on reforming in the late 1920s during Dawe’s turned the Young plan…
the same central bank which the english and americans insisted on reforming in the late 1920s during Dawe’s turned the Young plan…
👍3
over here
the German government agreed to restructure its central bank under Allied supervision
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/black-tuesday?utm_source=publication-search
the German government agreed to restructure its central bank under Allied supervision
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/black-tuesday?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
Black Tuesday
The Wall Street Crash of 1929 began on October 24th with Black Thursday, a day marked by significant market turmoil.
👍4
isnt it amazing how foundation funding, in essence, aligns pretty much exactly with the revised history i’ve gradually arrived at?
i didn’t even consult the rockefeller annuals for years. but virtually every subversive initiative is funded by rockefeller - especially rockefeller - ford, soros, gates, bloomberg, carnegie…
rothschild are different. they draw the map. everyone else fills in the blanks on their behalf. they dont occupy the clearinghouses, they help establish the standards for them.
i didn’t even consult the rockefeller annuals for years. but virtually every subversive initiative is funded by rockefeller - especially rockefeller - ford, soros, gates, bloomberg, carnegie…
rothschild are different. they draw the map. everyone else fills in the blanks on their behalf. they dont occupy the clearinghouses, they help establish the standards for them.
❤6👍6