oh my appearance on courtenay turner taped last august is up over here
https://courtenayturner.com/ep-498-the-governance-stack-how-technocracy-was-built-over-200-years/
https://courtenayturner.com/ep-498-the-governance-stack-how-technocracy-was-built-over-200-years/
π7π2π1
havent actually listened to this before. er, ok, not my finest hour. this is the slight issue wrt presenting information without having fully placed it yet. the information is there, but it could certainly be structured and delivered better...
π8π€1
β¦ and i arrived there without taking a single penny outside of subscriptions, and a few donations. thatβs probably why i arrived there.
π12π―4β€1
interesting. i havenβt lost 10 subs from the most recent essay. i speculated that intelligence (itβs clearly them, as the mechanism is platform agnostic) building up an inventory of accounts which can then be used to unsub in an attempt to demotivate. last time around, i noticed the 10 unsubs post-publishing an essay didnβt happen at the third essay, and itβs not happening this time around, either.
that doesnβt constitute proof, of course, but second observation in succession is harder to explain away.
that doesnβt constitute proof, of course, but second observation in succession is harder to explain away.
added another 46, including a few which are WIP (the 1942 Funk document), and suddenly, the 1968 UNESCO Biosphere Conference proceedings are displaced.
https://t.me/escapekey/4491
https://t.me/escapekey/4491
π€‘1π1
asked it to stress test the argument again in light of the now 226 essays which include early WIP work on the funk material⦠the remaining task is distribution.
i do feel pretty confident about this, because this is what iβve spent 3 years doing. i really do not see this not being it.
itβs densely sourced, typically with primary docs, and it doesnβt just align with governance, but with finance, education, health, climate, β¦ itβs a patchwork, a lattice of information which has to be incorrect for this to not hold.
i do feel pretty confident about this, because this is what iβve spent 3 years doing. i really do not see this not being it.
itβs densely sourced, typically with primary docs, and it doesnβt just align with governance, but with finance, education, health, climate, β¦ itβs a patchwork, a lattice of information which has to be incorrect for this to not hold.
π₯13π₯°1π1
and here's an accessible onboarding summary essay
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/illusions-of-a-multipolar-world
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/illusions-of-a-multipolar-world
π3β€2
right, so 'mansion house' wasn't a welcome addition to google's index.
let's see for how long 'illusions of a multipolar world' survives in the index
also, down to 62 entries. let's see where we'll be by the end of the month. 30? 20?
let's see for how long 'illusions of a multipolar world' survives in the index
also, down to 62 entries. let's see where we'll be by the end of the month. 30? 20?
π4
hunke argues that in the anglo-saxon system, the adam smith based clearing function prioritises upwards, whereas the nazi system through friedrich list should prioritise downwards
i can see how the financial masters of london would want to avoid that at all cost
i can see how the financial masters of london would want to avoid that at all cost
β€3π―1
amusingly, i actually laid out the same argument over here wrt financial surveillance
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/how-to-fix-cbdcs-and-why-they-wont?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/how-to-fix-cbdcs-and-why-they-wont?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
How to Fix CBDCs (And Why They Wonβt)
Central banks are building programmable currencies.
β€6π₯1
holy moly, the clearinghouse is the most important concept in the world with which almost no-oneβs familiar.
π₯10π―5