that didn’t take them long

‘Planning in the USSR’ has since been removed from google’s indexed pages over the past month. it’s been, what, a few hours.

ironic, really, because to me it feels a tad as though soviet leadership would have loved google

https://t.me/escapekey/4474

oh my appearance on courtenay turner taped last august is up over here

https://courtenayturner.com/ep-498-the-governance-stack-how-technocracy-was-built-over-200-years/

havent actually listened to this before. er, ok, not my finest hour. this is the slight issue wrt presenting information without having fully placed it yet. the information is there, but it could certainly be structured and delivered better...

i fed opus 180+ of my essays and asked it to summarise its findings.

it, too, establishes the 1968 UNESCO Biosphere Conference as the single most important conference, the environmental concerns as the gateway, and Alexander Bogdanov being crucial to its development

… and i arrived there without taking a single penny outside of subscriptions, and a few donations. that’s probably why i arrived there.

interesting. i haven’t lost 10 subs from the most recent essay. i speculated that intelligence (it’s clearly them, as the mechanism is platform agnostic) building up an inventory of accounts which can then be used to unsub in an attempt to demotivate. last time around, i noticed the 10 unsubs post-publishing an essay didn’t happen at the third essay, and it’s not happening this time around, either.

that doesn’t constitute proof, of course, but second observation in succession is harder to explain away.

added another 46, including a few which are WIP (the 1942 Funk document), and suddenly, the 1968 UNESCO Biosphere Conference proceedings are displaced.

https://t.me/escapekey/4491

asked it to stress test the argument again in light of the now 226 essays which include early WIP work on the funk material… the remaining task is distribution.

i do feel pretty confident about this, because this is what i’ve spent 3 years doing. i really do not see this not being it.

it’s densely sourced, typically with primary docs, and it doesn’t just align with governance, but with finance, education, health, climate, … it’s a patchwork, a lattice of information which has to be incorrect for this to not hold.

lol, google+twitter+facebook = 0.66% in total

stalin would have loved those three

oops forgot to drop this here

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/calibrators

PDF

and here's an accessible onboarding summary essay

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/illusions-of-a-multipolar-world

PDF

sheesh i could quote this chapter at length. in fact, i will. holy moly.

no wonder keynes thought this report was excellent.

hunke argues that in the anglo-saxon system, the adam smith based clearing function prioritises upwards, whereas the nazi system through friedrich list should prioritise downwards

i can see how the financial masters of london would want to avoid that at all cost

amusingly, i actually laid out the same argument over here wrt financial surveillance

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/how-to-fix-cbdcs-and-why-they-wont?utm_source=publication-search