the tories have fundamentally been aligned with labour since certainly Cameron's government beginning in 2010. setting aside the rhetoric, they've pursued policies to the same end objective.

i think we're pretty much at end station. remarkable how well planned this was.

lol

https://new-economicsf.files.svdcdn.com/production/files/3a512ad0ef4458b28b_ntm6bwk42.pdf

obviously in here as well

https://neweconomics.org/2020/03/covid-19-the-government-must-go-further

i leave this as an exercise for the reader, but this is astonishing.

what's crucial in this document?

hint: this was published BEFORE 'tragedy of the horizon'. the mechanism was suggested before the policy objective.

https://new-economicsf.files.svdcdn.com/production/files/e79789e1e31f261e95_ypm6b49z7.pdf

'spose that is an ancestor...

https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16569/1/GreenQuEasing.pdf

here's a tweet i found from today, incidentally. a rare occasion, where i could find something on google.

practically a who's who of 'stranded assets'

their entire ‘research’ catalogue comes across incredibly fabien-esque, especially their early material

https://new-economicsf.files.svdcdn.com/production/files/Land-that-works-for-us.pdf?dm=1774631312

in that, that sounds explicitly ‘ecosystem approach’ to me

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-ecosystem-approach?utm_source=publication-search

heres the Basel/NGFS argument (pricing capital) laid out in national terms, without stating the mechanism itself

https://new-economicsf.files.svdcdn.com/production/files/Reducing-interest-rates-for-clean-energy-FINAL-Nov-2024.pdf?dm=1732874840

i could carry on with the ‘definitely-not-fabian-society’ aka NEF pamphlets. they’ve essentially laid out the entire programme, though in small fragments. not sure there’s a point, however. feels like beating a dead horse at this stage.

you must feel very confident in your ability to censor. i personally wouldn’t be. to me, that’s an engineering challenge.

people know something’s wrong, but they struggle to argue exactly what it is. the ‘third way’ inherits both features of the left and right, so the two camps can argue forever whether it’s socialism or capitalism.

call it third way (uk/us), third system (ifda), bernstein’s public private partnerships, reinicke’s trisectoral network (un), or the new economic policy (lenin)

oh wait - NEF… the new economic foundation. golly, it’s another coincidence. a foundation-funded ‘civil society organisation’ (aka NGO) controlling the purposive ethic, for the public and private to implement.

the NGO’s the one quietly in charge. and that NGO is funded by the foundations.