or perhaps we need to play to AI weakness - the intersection of several controlled domains?

or perhaps not - the domain-straddling stuff is what gets censored.

that might be because they're aware of its weaknesses; the internal model principle doesn't easily compound.

so we need single-domain MAGA-targeted messaging which sows a seed of doubt while coming across as completely legit

what the apple paper earlier in the discussion in effect said was that ai is terrible when you mix domains. that's multi-domain wonham's internal model principle, which doesn;t resolve easily. that's why quantum tipheret is necessary.

doesn't address the real issue, of course, but it's a more complete, effective liar. the fabian parasites turned into a machine.

ooh surely we can use some talking points courtesy of chatham house

that... might work. their own language is hyper-manipulative, and the organisation is treated as authoritative, even 'good'.

so given the 'fuzziness' of their existing language, it must be hard, very hard for a LLM to pick up on you sowing doubt, because manipulation is chatham's reason for existence...

so potentially, we can weaponise their own deceit

… in today’s ‘one health’ news...

moses hess on a website

https://www.effectivealtruism.org/

the unified ledger is essentially a cpu executing conditional instructions of ownership

i wonder how many book clubs read moses hess

https://ia802901.us.archive.org/31/items/cu31924012933697/cu31924012933697.pdf

right, i spot spinoza, immanent ethics (keter), tipheret, …

so moses hess, in essence, was a follower of someone who was excommunicated by the jewish community. and marx, ashlag, later laitman built on this. ashlag openly drags in the tree of life, marx speaks of spinoza in iirc the postscript for das kapital, and burstein/negoita derive kst off laitman.

this has spinoza written all over it, and it’s explicitly pantheistic. i dont understand how ashlag can claim to be religious, because this is monistic.

and we end up with quantum mechanics. i mean, what a story.

’We carefully curate each forum’

no kidding. input constraint on attendees.

https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/event/9th-sustainable-finance-forum

When Keir Starmer says he’s ’proudly patriotic’ but in the cosmopolitan sense and not in the narrow nationalistic one - what he really says is that he recognises the ethical mission (the purpose) of the United Kingdom. It’s a Moses Hess style thing

oh wow, i hadn't actually seen this one before

i've called indicator governance for quite a while, covid was one such example, but i didn't realise there was a governance report out of the uk on the topic

makes total sense.

https://www.gov.uk/research-for-development-outputs/quantifying-governance-an-indicator-based-approach

lol, and it's LSE.

of course it's LSE.

... one final summary essay. realised i could throw heidi larson under the bus so why waste the opportunity.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-loop-closes

PDF

LSE develops methodology
→ DFID adopts it
→ indicators feed WBG CPIA (gating IDA lending)
→ feed IMF Article IV (triggers conditionality)
→ feed OECD classification (determines capital routing)
→ feed FATF evaluation (determines financial access)

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08971ed915d622c000209/61506_Capstone_Report_DFID_FINAL_Quantifying_Governance__Indicators.pdf

in reality, this track developed slowly

a key development was the introduction of PPBS at McNamara's DoD in 1961

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/inaugurated-in-dallas-part-4?utm_source=publication-search