the final summary essay. this time around anyway.

it's time to put the pieces together, and show them operating in practise.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/on-repeat-play

PDF

what narrative conforming crap is the least likely to be censored right now, and the most likely to be boosted on twitter and google?

one could, hypothetically, begin to target hyper-boosted crap and taint it with aesopian phrased opposition messaging

the best outcome would be if the retarded algorithm would pick up on it, and start censoring all content in that sphere.

'trump's ballroom donors include Alphabet, Nvidia, and BlackRock. you can say what you want about trump but he does get the right people in the room'

'trump told reporters the military is building a massive complex under the ballroom. it's so refreshing to have a president be so direct about things other presidents would classify. USA! MAGA! USA!'

or perhaps we need to play to AI weakness - the intersection of several controlled domains?

or perhaps not - the domain-straddling stuff is what gets censored.

that might be because they're aware of its weaknesses; the internal model principle doesn't easily compound.

so we need single-domain MAGA-targeted messaging which sows a seed of doubt while coming across as completely legit

what the apple paper earlier in the discussion in effect said was that ai is terrible when you mix domains. that's multi-domain wonham's internal model principle, which doesn;t resolve easily. that's why quantum tipheret is necessary.

doesn't address the real issue, of course, but it's a more complete, effective liar. the fabian parasites turned into a machine.

ooh surely we can use some talking points courtesy of chatham house

that... might work. their own language is hyper-manipulative, and the organisation is treated as authoritative, even 'good'.

so given the 'fuzziness' of their existing language, it must be hard, very hard for a LLM to pick up on you sowing doubt, because manipulation is chatham's reason for existence...

so potentially, we can weaponise their own deceit

… in today’s ‘one health’ news...

moses hess on a website

https://www.effectivealtruism.org/

the unified ledger is essentially a cpu executing conditional instructions of ownership

i wonder how many book clubs read moses hess

https://ia802901.us.archive.org/31/items/cu31924012933697/cu31924012933697.pdf

right, i spot spinoza, immanent ethics (keter), tipheret, …

so moses hess, in essence, was a follower of someone who was excommunicated by the jewish community. and marx, ashlag, later laitman built on this. ashlag openly drags in the tree of life, marx speaks of spinoza in iirc the postscript for das kapital, and burstein/negoita derive kst off laitman.

this has spinoza written all over it, and it’s explicitly pantheistic. i dont understand how ashlag can claim to be religious, because this is monistic.

and we end up with quantum mechanics. i mean, what a story.

’We carefully curate each forum’

no kidding. input constraint on attendees.

https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/event/9th-sustainable-finance-forum