prescriptive 'geometric ethics'

... leads to claims of anticipatory governance

… three years of research. all to arrive at circular reasoning.

is that depressing or cathartic?

reminder that ‘call me david’ lost some tattoos along the way

https://t.me/escapekey/3174

soo… over the past week i’ve posted 3 summary essays and a number of notes on substack.

google has not indexed any of that at all. in fact, it finds only 10 results over the past week.

so i guess that google, along with twitter, has stepped up the censorship.

that’s fine. google+twitter+facebook combined yield around 0.8% of my impressions anyway, so it doesn’t really matter.

incidentally, brave search is around 50% of google figures, which is another LOL

haha the only link to my substack over the past month on google is to ‘input constraint’

hey google, clearly an error. i relate that concept to rothschild repeatedly.

who do i ping to have google address this error? the essay is clearly not in ‘public interest’ and should be removed.

seriously, though, just in case my profile disappears, make sure you’ve downloaded all essays.

they exist in PDF form on this channel (look for the files), alternatively, Litoralis zipped them all a few weeks back. only a handful short of the full catalogue.

https://t.me/escapekey/4228

the simple fact that both twitter and google resort to heavy suppression is in itself a data point. that’s why i want them to outright ban me, because i’ve done nothing indefensible. i don’t curse, i don’t blame groups, i don’t say anything without reason, and i densely source everything.

facebook… i couldn’t really care less about. who the hell is still on facebook?

zipped the 48 most recent essays. there will be overlap with Litoralis’s work. i would filter, but i’m lazy.

sooo... a man, posting on social media criticising people for posting on social media, while monetising his own social media presence criticising others for monetising their social media presence... yeah, that's a mute.

the final summary essay. this time around anyway.

it's time to put the pieces together, and show them operating in practise.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/on-repeat-play

PDF

what narrative conforming crap is the least likely to be censored right now, and the most likely to be boosted on twitter and google?

one could, hypothetically, begin to target hyper-boosted crap and taint it with aesopian phrased opposition messaging

the best outcome would be if the retarded algorithm would pick up on it, and start censoring all content in that sphere.

'trump's ballroom donors include Alphabet, Nvidia, and BlackRock. you can say what you want about trump but he does get the right people in the room'

'trump told reporters the military is building a massive complex under the ballroom. it's so refreshing to have a president be so direct about things other presidents would classify. USA! MAGA! USA!'

or perhaps we need to play to AI weakness - the intersection of several controlled domains?

or perhaps not - the domain-straddling stuff is what gets censored.

that might be because they're aware of its weaknesses; the internal model principle doesn't easily compound.

so we need single-domain MAGA-targeted messaging which sows a seed of doubt while coming across as completely legit

what the apple paper earlier in the discussion in effect said was that ai is terrible when you mix domains. that's multi-domain wonham's internal model principle, which doesn;t resolve easily. that's why quantum tipheret is necessary.

doesn't address the real issue, of course, but it's a more complete, effective liar. the fabian parasites turned into a machine.

ooh surely we can use some talking points courtesy of chatham house