Why is quantum computing even necessary here? Is it because it solves the combinatorial explosion issue? Because so far, it seems that computationally, that’s not set to become an issue anyway. Current AI with sufficient shrinkage and evolution will get there anyway.

Or is it because through Einstein-Bohr-Bohm it becomes unfalsifiable?

Through Einstein-Bohr-Bohm were led to a state where only a select class of ‘leaders’ can decipher the mysteries of the world… exactly as Ashlag suggested.

An unfalsifiable priesthood.

So it’s like a mersenne twister where you can see the random number generated but you cannot inspect the palette which created it - only those who prepared the quantum gate can. Well, technically the seed is destroyed but they hold the informational advantage here.

this is really all about a grand unified theory - of prescription. a perfect dictatorship, to which you cannot object.

quantum tipheret applied to finance

https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08180

and this is work to solve the issue highlighted by apple in 2025

the combinatorial explosion issue is real, but it’s solved through quantum computing which then also adds the informational advantage to those who seed the qubits

throw in federated ai… i mean, holy moly. this, sadly, makes complete fucking sense.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10656

here’s the apple paper

https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/illusion-of-thinking

right, should really have added ‘bidirectional’ to the BCI claims…

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32164851/

prescriptive 'geometric ethics'

... leads to claims of anticipatory governance

… three years of research. all to arrive at circular reasoning.

is that depressing or cathartic?

reminder that ‘call me david’ lost some tattoos along the way

https://t.me/escapekey/3174

soo… over the past week i’ve posted 3 summary essays and a number of notes on substack.

google has not indexed any of that at all. in fact, it finds only 10 results over the past week.

so i guess that google, along with twitter, has stepped up the censorship.

that’s fine. google+twitter+facebook combined yield around 0.8% of my impressions anyway, so it doesn’t really matter.

incidentally, brave search is around 50% of google figures, which is another LOL

haha the only link to my substack over the past month on google is to ‘input constraint’

hey google, clearly an error. i relate that concept to rothschild repeatedly.

who do i ping to have google address this error? the essay is clearly not in ‘public interest’ and should be removed.

seriously, though, just in case my profile disappears, make sure you’ve downloaded all essays.

they exist in PDF form on this channel (look for the files), alternatively, Litoralis zipped them all a few weeks back. only a handful short of the full catalogue.

https://t.me/escapekey/4228

the simple fact that both twitter and google resort to heavy suppression is in itself a data point. that’s why i want them to outright ban me, because i’ve done nothing indefensible. i don’t curse, i don’t blame groups, i don’t say anything without reason, and i densely source everything.

facebook… i couldn’t really care less about. who the hell is still on facebook?

zipped the 48 most recent essays. there will be overlap with Litoralis’s work. i would filter, but i’m lazy.

sooo... a man, posting on social media criticising people for posting on social media, while monetising his own social media presence criticising others for monetising their social media presence... yeah, that's a mute.

the final summary essay. this time around anyway.

it's time to put the pieces together, and show them operating in practise.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/on-repeat-play

PDF

what narrative conforming crap is the least likely to be censored right now, and the most likely to be boosted on twitter and google?