a less commonly discussed aspect of cybernetics and its manipulation of feedback loops is that is diffuses responsibility.

and in comtemporary society, the 'black box' (computational modelling) is never at fault for anything. every issue is because of lack of surveillance information (and hence we need to build more) - it's never because the models are wrong, or the people authoring the models corrupt

the thing is, not only did wiener explicitly discuss the 'black box' in this context, but he also identified the accuntability issue.

amusingly, wiener's books i never really touched. it's only here towards the end of my research mission that i discover...

so fucking bored of these new accounts with 0 followers doing opposition research, especially as i've answered this repeatedly.

tempted to reply with a deepseek reply just to troll

da'at is the navigator, tipheret is the pilot

but tipheret is migrating into ai

the tree of life is about flow control, and a core technique is masach; input constraint

i genuinely hate driving in london. but it's interesting, really, observing how the cars filter through traffic with mopeds continuously circling, looking for opportunities to overtake.

but it's in situations like that, where your mind is focused on something quite different something suddenly snaps, in this particular case being laszlo's quantum consciousness.

wrote quite a lot about him on twitter, but never ported it to substack. should really, because it makes complete sense as part of the same intellectual ecosystem...

yeah down the line, the demand for a 'purpose' makes rather a lot of sense.

Einstein said the world is deterministic - Bohr said perhaps but we cannot determine - Bohm said we might be able to predict it

Amusing.

... soooo... hess, marx, ashlag, laszlo... all downstream of spinoza... but who's the odd one out?

heres a hint

https://t.me/escapekey/4069

lol i see twitter 'fixed' their search again. i'm now down to just past single digits impression counts per day.

but hey, 'free speech' and musk, and all.

lol

over a month, twitter's brought me 486 impressions.

that's 16/day. extraordinary, really, given how much emphasis that platform totally places on 'free speech'.

hah, prior months: 2,885; 1,398; 1,464...

May 2010: the Rockefeller Foundation publishes Lock Step - pandemic as the trigger for top-down governance infrastructure, biometric ID, authoritarian leadership framed as public health necessity

February 2011: Epstein presents the impact investing blueprint at JPMorgan - public money takes losses, private investors take the senior tranche, 'public health' alignment determines where capital flows

2012: the Global Health Investment Fund launches from that blueprint

design the financing mechanism (impact investing; rockefeller/jp morgan/epstein)
design the trigger scenario (LockStep; Rockefeller)
trigger (covid)
fleece the taxpayer (foundations)
retain the architecture ('vax passports' ie digital id, lockdowns, quarantines, ...)

the GIIN/impact investing timeline was discussed in depth here

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein-iii?utm_source=publication-search

in yesterday's stats - twitter 9 impressions, facebook 10.

so, so, so close to running out of runway you fucking crooks.

just ftr, i want both platforms to completely ban me. but they're not going to. because it wouldn't serve their purpose - lying about all the 'free speech' they offer, so that the MSM can be totally outraged about said 'free speech' in a definitely-not-manufactured scripted chain of outrage theatre.