the bank of england needs to be investigated for corrupt activity
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/in-tandem?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/in-tandem?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
In Tandem
In 2023, Michael Jacobs authored a report that hints at the predictable direction they intend to take us.
π6π₯4π4
feel free to point out, btw, that the above example technically isnβt the BoEβs remit, in which case youβll have to explain why it technically isnβt anyoneβs.
because in that case, please explain to me why i would be prosecuted for offering a unique investment opportuniy along these lines, given the treasury are at liberty to lie.
because in that case, please explain to me why i would be prosecuted for offering a unique investment opportuniy along these lines, given the treasury are at liberty to lie.
π4π―3
michael laitman did a blog piece only a few weeks ago
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/what-is-the-meaning-of-tikkun-olam/
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/what-is-the-meaning-of-tikkun-olam/
π3β€2π±2π₯1
coming to the realisation there's not much more ground to cover. just a few more summary essays, then the funk 1942 document, then... unsure. everything's pretty mature. nothing's really changing at this stage.
written a substantial BIS IH/unified ledger simulator, and it all checks out. especially that it's not really about money. it's about control.
meanwhile, meryl nass drove 2x google's numbers to my substack yesterday, ukcolumn added google+facebook, and twitter was essentially level with moonofalabama...
written a substantial BIS IH/unified ledger simulator, and it all checks out. especially that it's not really about money. it's about control.
meanwhile, meryl nass drove 2x google's numbers to my substack yesterday, ukcolumn added google+facebook, and twitter was essentially level with moonofalabama...
β€6π―4
a less commonly discussed aspect of cybernetics and its manipulation of feedback loops is that is diffuses responsibility.
and in comtemporary society, the 'black box' (computational modelling) is never at fault for anything. every issue is because of lack of surveillance information (and hence we need to build more) - it's never because the models are wrong, or the people authoring the models corrupt
and in comtemporary society, the 'black box' (computational modelling) is never at fault for anything. every issue is because of lack of surveillance information (and hence we need to build more) - it's never because the models are wrong, or the people authoring the models corrupt
π7π₯6π―1
the thing is, not only did wiener explicitly discuss the 'black box' in this context, but he also identified the accuntability issue.
amusingly, wiener's books i never really touched. it's only here towards the end of my research mission that i discover...
amusingly, wiener's books i never really touched. it's only here towards the end of my research mission that i discover...
β€1
the tree of life is about flow control, and a core technique is masach; input constraint
π₯3
i genuinely hate driving in london. but it's interesting, really, observing how the cars filter through traffic with mopeds continuously circling, looking for opportunities to overtake.
but it's in situations like that, where your mind is focused on something quite different something suddenly snaps, in this particular case being laszlo's quantum consciousness.
wrote quite a lot about him on twitter, but never ported it to substack. should really, because it makes complete sense as part of the same intellectual ecosystem...
but it's in situations like that, where your mind is focused on something quite different something suddenly snaps, in this particular case being laszlo's quantum consciousness.
wrote quite a lot about him on twitter, but never ported it to substack. should really, because it makes complete sense as part of the same intellectual ecosystem...
π6π€4
Einstein said the world is deterministic - Bohr said perhaps but we cannot determine - Bohm said we might be able to predict it
Amusing.
Amusing.
π4π2π―1
... soooo... hess, marx, ashlag, laszlo... all downstream of spinoza... but who's the odd one out?
π₯1