the BoE is the regulator.

they have not challenged the obviously BS £9 return on £1 ‘impact’ investment.

consequently, either they are incompetent, or they find the figure acceptable.

this is key.

now, the pound sterling is debt-based. what this means is that it’s a claim on future income.

consequently, we have the pound sterling and the uk debt load which is a claim on future income, AND we have a 9:1 return on ‘impact investing’.

ergo, all we have to do to fix the UK’s debt issue, is balance the two relative to one another.

the BoE is fine with this. they haven’t objected to the obvious lie that is a 9:1 return on investment.

consequently, all we have to do, is spend £300bn on ‘impact investment’, offset the BoE-backed gains of £2.7tn against the uk public sector debt, and the nation is debt free.

thanks, bank of england.

(well, technically we’d be £300bn in the hole - but that’s much better than £2.7tn)

as regulator, the bank of england have accepted this absurd crap of a 9:1 return on ‘impact’ investing. consequently, the need to bear the responsibility here.

they’re not fit to regulate with this level of incompetence.

why are my messages here now posting in super-slow motion, one character at a time?

excellent - here’s how the UK will go debt free in an instant.

the BoE either has grossly failed in its duties, or is ok with obviously fraudulent maths.

the bank of england needs to be investigated for corrupt activity

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/in-tandem?utm_source=publication-search

feel free to point out, btw, that the above example technically isn’t the BoE’s remit, in which case you’ll have to explain why it technically isn’t anyone’s.

because in that case, please explain to me why i would be prosecuted for offering a unique investment opportuniy along these lines, given the treasury are at liberty to lie.

almost done with summary essays

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/macro-to-micro

PDF

What a shock, eh? The government and civil service needs all those communists routed.

michael laitman did a blog piece only a few weeks ago

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/what-is-the-meaning-of-tikkun-olam/

'Central banks pay well but probably don't want the qliphothic analysis included'

lol, you dont say

i shall call it the one world model. seems apt.

coming to the realisation there's not much more ground to cover. just a few more summary essays, then the funk 1942 document, then... unsure. everything's pretty mature. nothing's really changing at this stage.

written a substantial BIS IH/unified ledger simulator, and it all checks out. especially that it's not really about money. it's about control.

meanwhile, meryl nass drove 2x google's numbers to my substack yesterday, ukcolumn added google+facebook, and twitter was essentially level with moonofalabama...

when i was a child, the population of sweden was 8 million. the population of denmark was 5m.

now, the population of sweden is 10.6m, and denmark 5.9m.

soon, sweden's population will be 11m. probably around the time denmark bridges 6m.

a less commonly discussed aspect of cybernetics and its manipulation of feedback loops is that is diffuses responsibility.

and in comtemporary society, the 'black box' (computational modelling) is never at fault for anything. every issue is because of lack of surveillance information (and hence we need to build more) - it's never because the models are wrong, or the people authoring the models corrupt

the thing is, not only did wiener explicitly discuss the 'black box' in this context, but he also identified the accuntability issue.

amusingly, wiener's books i never really touched. it's only here towards the end of my research mission that i discover...

so fucking bored of these new accounts with 0 followers doing opposition research, especially as i've answered this repeatedly.

tempted to reply with a deepseek reply just to troll

da'at is the navigator, tipheret is the pilot

but tipheret is migrating into ai

the tree of life is about flow control, and a core technique is masach; input constraint