Ok I come back to see 100 messages some of which are clearly over the line. I don’t mind lively debate but keep it civil.
👍10
👍10🙏10❤4
cheers again, ben, that ‘Office for the Impact Economy’ report has led me to O'Donohoe. this is fucking criminal. it’s so blatant what they’ve done.
🔥7
it might be ‘technically legal’, but that these pricks at the same time speaks of an ‘impact economy’ which ‘sells’ blended finance for ethical purposes which allows private parties to rip off the taxpayer, while lying about future rewards (modelled by a ‘black box’, and foe which no-one will accept responsibility) is so far beyond any legit ‘ethical’ boundary that it being ‘technically legal’ is virtually irrelevant.
they knew bloody well what they were doing, and it had nothing to do with positive ‘social impact’
they knew bloody well what they were doing, and it had nothing to do with positive ‘social impact’
💯12👍2❤1
it’s outright theft, and it runs straight through JP Morgan. and Jamie Dimon was present at the 2009 GIIN announcement at the Clinton Global Initiative.
it’s fraud, through and through. oh, sorry, it ‘does not meet the legal definition of fraud’, in spite of it having zip to do with legit ‘social impact’.
https://giin-web-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/giin/assets/press-release/giin-launch-2009.pdf
it’s fraud, through and through. oh, sorry, it ‘does not meet the legal definition of fraud’, in spite of it having zip to do with legit ‘social impact’.
https://giin-web-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/giin/assets/press-release/giin-launch-2009.pdf
❤4
i covered this a few times already
not least over here
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein-iii?utm_source=publication-search
not least over here
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein-iii?utm_source=publication-search
👍8
Ronald Cohen and O'Donohoe were essentially tag-teaming this, with JP Morgan and Jeffrey Epstein
👍3
it should be mainstream fucking news, instead google, twitter and facebook by intent censor it. what does that tell you?
🔥9💯3⚡2
a particular lie relates to the claim that earlier versions generated £9 in public value for every £1 spent
with that kind of return on investment, the private sector should frankly not even want the public anywhere near it.
funny, that. because they refuse to enter, unless the sucker… sorry, taxpayer goes first.
with that kind of return on investment, the private sector should frankly not even want the public anywhere near it.
funny, that. because they refuse to enter, unless the sucker… sorry, taxpayer goes first.
👍9❤2
the ‘sophisticated investor’.
boy, those ‘impact investments’ were sh-tty deals.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/levin-repeatedly-references-shty-deal-at-goldman-hearing/
boy, those ‘impact investments’ were sh-tty deals.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/levin-repeatedly-references-shty-deal-at-goldman-hearing/
Cbsnews
Levin Repeatedly References "Sh**ty Deal" at Goldman Hearing
Quoting an E-Mail, Senator Uses Phrase Multiple Times in About Ten Minutes While Questioning Former Goldman Sachs Executive
👍2🫡2
the amount of material here… between Ronald Cohen and O'Donohoe… there is no f’ing way this isn’t it.
lob in al gore, the clintons, epstein… rothschild, rockefeller,… i mean, what is the MSM busy with?
Beyonce’s new hair do? something about a democract calling trump dumb? a republican calling Iran evil?
the magnitude of this scandal is, frankly, on an unprecedented scale. astonishing they can get away with this scale of grand larceny.
lob in al gore, the clintons, epstein… rothschild, rockefeller,… i mean, what is the MSM busy with?
Beyonce’s new hair do? something about a democract calling trump dumb? a republican calling Iran evil?
the magnitude of this scandal is, frankly, on an unprecedented scale. astonishing they can get away with this scale of grand larceny.
👍8🔥5
oh now i have a fucking great idea wrt bringing down the uk debt load.
either that, or those BoE-backed crooks have to own up to fraudulent maths.
either that, or those BoE-backed crooks have to own up to fraudulent maths.
❤4