1.6K subscribers
2.86K photos
3 videos
158 files
1.53K links
Download Telegram
wow. they’re accelerating their bs. this reeks of desperation. do they really believe this will work again?
😁11🤯6👍21🤩1
right, well, if they accelerate, then so will i

this is largely a summary essay

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/ratified-by-g20
👏11🔥42
about Digital Public Infrastructure (digital ID, wallets, surveillance, CBDCs with conditionality):

they implement DPI through 'health' in europe+
they implement DPI through conflict in the middle east and ukraine
they implement DPI through 'development aid' in the G77
they implement DPI through 'financial inclusion' in the low-to-middle income countries
they implement DPI through private-sector initiatives in the states
👍11
One Fabian parasite battles the other Fabian parasite over who should be the front face of the technocratic infrastructure they both promote through differing rhetorics
👍13🤣3🔥1
Doc Malik podcast - done
👍114👌2
Ok I come back to see 100 messages some of which are clearly over the line. I don’t mind lively debate but keep it civil.
👍10
Great news!

A third Fabian parasite has announced he’s running for prime parasite of the uk
🤮16🤡6🤯2💯1
8👍3
t/y Litoralis, full archive of my substack essays

https://transfer.it/t/V0VFHahhxJJZ
👍10🙏104
👍721
twitter+facebook+google = 0.92% yesterday. practically invisible.
👎2🤯1
cheers again, ben, that ‘Office for the Impact Economy’ report has led me to O'Donohoe. this is fucking criminal. it’s so blatant what they’ve done.
🔥7
it might be ‘technically legal’, but that these pricks at the same time speaks of an ‘impact economy’ which ‘sells’ blended finance for ethical purposes which allows private parties to rip off the taxpayer, while lying about future rewards (modelled by a ‘black box’, and foe which no-one will accept responsibility) is so far beyond any legit ‘ethical’ boundary that it being ‘technically legal’ is virtually irrelevant.

they knew bloody well what they were doing, and it had nothing to do with positive ‘social impact’
💯12👍21
it’s outright theft, and it runs straight through JP Morgan. and Jamie Dimon was present at the 2009 GIIN announcement at the Clinton Global Initiative.

it’s fraud, through and through. oh, sorry, it ‘does not meet the legal definition of fraud’, in spite of it having zip to do with legit ‘social impact’.

https://giin-web-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/giin/assets/press-release/giin-launch-2009.pdf
4
i covered this a few times already

not least over here

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein-iii?utm_source=publication-search
👍8