i think all the hantavirus bs is starting to smell a bit desperate.
i’m also happy i wasn’t on that boat, taken away to a hospital, where they would likely attempt to kill me.
i’m also happy i wasn’t on that boat, taken away to a hospital, where they would likely attempt to kill me.
👍18💯15👏1🤣1
wrt the claim that this is ‘communitarianism’ -
it traces back to marx and ashlag, who explicitly titled it ‘communism’
lenin, bogdanov, hess, and laitman are similarly explicit
bernstein was a revisionist marxist, who built on wolf’s framework
but it ultimately all stems from moses hess
it’s communism, but call it whatever you want. the discussion if it’s this or that is irrelevant, and only wastes time. but i will call it ‘communism’ because that’s what it traces back to.
it traces back to marx and ashlag, who explicitly titled it ‘communism’
lenin, bogdanov, hess, and laitman are similarly explicit
bernstein was a revisionist marxist, who built on wolf’s framework
but it ultimately all stems from moses hess
it’s communism, but call it whatever you want. the discussion if it’s this or that is irrelevant, and only wastes time. but i will call it ‘communism’ because that’s what it traces back to.
⚡5👍3
right, well, if they accelerate, then so will i
this is largely a summary essay
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/ratified-by-g20
this is largely a summary essay
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/ratified-by-g20
👏11🔥4❤2
about Digital Public Infrastructure (digital ID, wallets, surveillance, CBDCs with conditionality):
they implement DPI through 'health' in europe+
they implement DPI through conflict in the middle east and ukraine
they implement DPI through 'development aid' in the G77
they implement DPI through 'financial inclusion' in the low-to-middle income countries
they implement DPI through private-sector initiatives in the states
they implement DPI through 'health' in europe+
they implement DPI through conflict in the middle east and ukraine
they implement DPI through 'development aid' in the G77
they implement DPI through 'financial inclusion' in the low-to-middle income countries
they implement DPI through private-sector initiatives in the states
👍11
I never really covered this, but this overlaps with the stranded assets forums. Not just in terms of timing but function. Rothschild focused on function, UNEP on institutions.
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/inquiry-design-sustainable-financial-system
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/inquiry-design-sustainable-financial-system
UN Environment Programme
Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System
Davos, 23 January 2014 - The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) launched an Inquiry today into policy options for guiding the global financial system to invest in the transition to a green economy.
👍1
Stranded assets track - featuring Al gore.
Hillary Clinton was on the parallel impact investing track. I covered that especially in ‘Epstein iii’
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-waddesdon-papers?utm_source=publication-search
Hillary Clinton was on the parallel impact investing track. I covered that especially in ‘Epstein iii’
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-waddesdon-papers?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
The Waddesdon Papers
Between March 2014 and June 2018, the University of Oxford’s Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment convened a series of private forums at Waddesdon Manor, the Rothschild family estate in Buckinghamshire.
👍8
Ok I come back to see 100 messages some of which are clearly over the line. I don’t mind lively debate but keep it civil.
👍10
👍10🙏10❤4
cheers again, ben, that ‘Office for the Impact Economy’ report has led me to O'Donohoe. this is fucking criminal. it’s so blatant what they’ve done.
🔥7
it might be ‘technically legal’, but that these pricks at the same time speaks of an ‘impact economy’ which ‘sells’ blended finance for ethical purposes which allows private parties to rip off the taxpayer, while lying about future rewards (modelled by a ‘black box’, and foe which no-one will accept responsibility) is so far beyond any legit ‘ethical’ boundary that it being ‘technically legal’ is virtually irrelevant.
they knew bloody well what they were doing, and it had nothing to do with positive ‘social impact’
they knew bloody well what they were doing, and it had nothing to do with positive ‘social impact’
💯12👍2❤1