Marx’s closed-loop model system which works on basis of alleged prediction MUST eliminate the independent price signal, because otherwise there's unpredictability baked into the pie

but in reality, by eliminating the market price signal it doesnt eliminate lack of predictability, it just moves the issue elsewhere

now that twitter’s moved grok off site, and demand payment for ‘expert’ analysis, i’m not completely sure there’s a point to my twitter account anymore. might delete it.

logged out for the time being

PDF

back to 'moral and dogma', and it just confirms the same picture, from a different angle.

https://web.archive.org/web/20130410065541/http://rosecroix.org.au/gen-62.pdf

Gloria Dei est celare verbum

so the story in the media goes that the us attempted to seize an iranian tanker, shots were fired in retaliation, and now CENTCOM acts all innocnet

it's just non-stop lies. the Iraqi information minister clearly works in some current american capacity

so now that labour and the tories are suffering election collapse in local elections, the BBC decides to barely put it on the front page?

hah the bs ‘hantavirus’ episode is of sufficient importance for twice as much space in more premium locations than local elections in the uk which don’t go the fabian parasites’ way

marx's system of flow in essence ends up with atheism and materialism, where the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' is integrated through infrastructure

ashlah runs through religion, which aligns with hermann cohen, who saw religion as a channel of 'moral' encoding

but ashlag also routes through laitman, who then through burstein and negoita integrates with kabbalah system theory which leads to knowledge systems, AI, finance, and social systems

all three lead to a population processed through a clearing function against conditions it didn't set and can't audit. and the primary tool in this regard is conditional CBDCs

and it all traces back to moses hess

choose one or the other, wont matter. all end up in the same place

hess, marx, lenin, bogdanov, leontief, ashlag, laitman, burstein, negoita… every single one works to solve the same problem: how to surveil and manage flows so that the output serves the alleged ‘social good’

Hess: money as social blood, flows must serve the common good
Marx: flows must serve the workers through administrative allocation
Lenin: accounting and control - flows must be visible and directed
Bogdanov: universal organisational science - all flows in all domains must be integrated.
Leontief: input-output matrices - all flows quantified
Ashlag: flows must serve divinity through ‘altruistic bestowal’
Laitman: flows must align with the laws of lights and vessels
Burstein and Negoita: flows must be processed through sephirotic fuzzy logic - computationally optimised bestowal

every single one worked to direct flows for ‘the social good’ - and no-one is ever asked what they believe that 'social good' should be about. that's dictated through dubious 'science' which you're not allowed to call into question, lest you ‘endanger our collective future’

we could even include the freemasons here as well.

i could add ICSU SCOPE here, who worked to analyse the flows of carbon, nitrogen, nutrients, water… in especially the 70s.

that also makes perfect sense in terms of time - because that followed the 1968 UNESCO biosphere conference which, in essence, was the public launch of the ‘spaceship earth’ closed loop system ideology which eventually brought us the ‘circular economy’…

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/scope?utm_source=publication-search

it took me 3+ years of intense reverse engineering of pretty complex material to arrive at this conclusion. often, i walked in the wrong direction.

but this is what the text says.

on the more lighthearted side of things - my oldest is now of the age where he listens to a very odd blend of AC/DC, Metallica, and… Eminem.

i never realised how much Eminem sounds like an angry Donald Duck until my son lowered the volume the other day.