PDF

haha yesterday google+twitter+facebook drove 0.87% of my substack traffic.

still ended the day +20 subs.

almost out of runway. almost out of runway.

… Marx builds the material base (Maschiah ben Yosef), then Ashlag installs the fuel (religion) that makes it permanent (ben David)…?

... and that religion is the baha'i faith?

the are no contradictions in marxism, when you treat it as an architecture of accounting

there’s no liberty either

in some regards, kimi is still a touch light weight, but it doesnt suffer from gemini/chatgpt/copilots increasing tendencies to just continuously weasel out of any controversial conclusions

working like a mad eejit to finish the final part of my essays on marx, and it summarise these fairly well

in fairness, i have not summarised it as such, but its conclusion is correct -

marxism, in essence, works to eliminate capital formation. it’s about stripping liberty, and replacing it with complete dependency.

last one, i promise

but when viewed in light of systems theory, all internal contradictions of marx dissolve.

marx, in essence, was a hyper-manipulative crook. and his scam appears to have gone unnoticed for almost 180 years.

there's no way it wasnt by intent if it resolves ALL internal contradictions in this fashion, or at least, the odds are long

not forgetting that the entire hess, marx, bogdanov, lenin lineage continuously added missing technical layers to the same structure.

it’s no coincidence, because it was by intent. an incredibly long con.

lenin, perhaps, is the least dishonest. accounting and control is too straightforward to be misunderstood. well, apart from bogdanov perhaps, but he was a somewhat ignored geek, so there’s that.

just a few of the things which resolve cleanly when you interpret Marx through a systems theory lens

just one more essay to go, then consider Marx’s steaming pile of horse manure done

as for all those who seek to refute on grounds of marx’s alleged ‘intent’, explain in concrete terms of how the state will wither away - no abstracts please. i can - can you?

version 2

full rez

haha fridge PhD diploma time

dont take this too seriously, of course, but do realise what it says - because the synthesis is too complete (spanning too many domains), and because i didn’t waste 250 pages explaning the same, it wouldn’t clear the bar

https://claude.ai/share/fecf3631-2dfa-4dd0-9032-a4e6f8e9b2ad

i think the masons are back, commenting on my substack. certainly feel that way. i’ve muted a number of them in the past, because they refuse to argue the core point.

version 3.

i think it’s done, now. even sorted them in the correct order.

the only defense here is full visibility. exposure.

they developed this through distributed general systems theory components, standardised through ISO.

i made this point in my essay on maxwell. i stand by this even stronger after having dived a final time through marx.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/maxwell?utm_source=publication-search

yesterday’s substack stats:

facebook+twitter+google = 0.84% of all my impressions - down from 0.87% the previous day. four days in a row with less than 1% of all traffic.

i see, so you’re gradually reducing it to zero, believing that by doing so gradually, it’s not visible as all hell?

https://t.me/escapekey/4149

i keep writing the same essays, over and over and over again, from different angles. it suddenly appears to me that i’ve seen that entire marx table before, just from a different perspective. but that essay needs to be properly developed, slowly and methodologically, because of the implications.

Marx’s closed-loop model system which works on basis of alleged prediction MUST eliminate the independent price signal, because otherwise there's unpredictability baked into the pie

but in reality, by eliminating the market price signal it doesnt eliminate lack of predictability, it just moves the issue elsewhere