so yesterday, moonofalabama (t/y) carried nearly 3x the amount of traffic from twitter, facebook and google combined.

i'm in particular grateful for the 6 impressions from twitter, which led to 2 new subscribers.

also, i added 30+ new subs yesterday. your censorship is failing.

the only way out of this is awareness

dont worry, there will totally be a vaccine against this in no time whatsoever

haha not yet fully tallied, but so far, yesterday i received the same amount of views from people passing links to my substack via a czech online email service as via twitter

almost - out - of - runway. also: fuck you.

hmm, since google doesnt genuinly index my essays, i might have to do that manually

'the nature has rights'

soon, they will trump human rights

should probably post this here as well -

again - i have no problem with people disagreing over topics in the discussion channel, but please do remain civil, thank you. we don't need division within our own ranks, it does next to nothing at best.

as we decipher what's actually take place, we're bound to disagree on a number of things. that's to be expected, and it's healthy. present me would probably disagree with myself of 2 years ago in a fictitious discussion.

2 months short of the 250th anniversary.

full stats - a big congrats to twitter for decidedly pulling ahead of people on a single-language email website forwarding links, landing at 7 impressions versus seznam's 5.

also, a big congrats to google - by far the world's dominant search engine - for managing to equal the amount of impressions relative to emails sent with links to my substack.

well done, though in fairness, i don't know why you even pretend at this stage. might as well fully block me as the censorship is so laughably obvious.

another look at Burstein and Negoita’s Kabbalah System Theory papers.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-black-swan-factory

PDF

lol @ deepseek's reaction to a future essay i work on...

that is one hell of a list.

yeah and mix all the surveillance data into one pool.

that's how you create the 'complex global shock' alright.

UN —> 'peace' ethic, and superstructure
OECD —> statistics, cognitive
AI —> evaluative clearinghouse
BIS —> behavioural settlement
YOU —> managed population

hmm...

right, this is pretty centric.

https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-coherence-for-sustainable-development.html

companion essay to ‘the black swan factory’

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/eleven-gates

PDF

also - ‘governing ai’ and ‘governing through ai’ requires the same infrastructure

but in the world of united nation inversion, such honesty is not to be expected