and, again - egoistic communism (dictatorship of the proletariat) precedes the final stage of ‘altruistic’ communism

you must hand over all property, and go through a reign of terror before you arrive at salvation - if you survive, that is

i mean… this is their own text. it’s their own text. i’m sure a lot of people disagree with this, but this is explicitly in Ashlag’s own writing.

around halfway down.

https://kabbalahmedia.info/en/sources/oIrPpKn2

… and Russell Brand is now totally a Christian.

… Maimonides...

so we have

cognitive leaders (standards)
evaluative altruists (the clearinghouse)
behavioural egoists (settlement)

ooh that reminds me, level 33’s are the evaluative altruists

let’s just pop over here, because there’s something that… is quite telling.

first he quasi-praises the soviet union… but then he says that the soviet state has failed, and the reason is because they’ve based their ethic on humankind itself, and not god/the creator

in other words - the model can place any ethic at the top, and “that wasn’t real communism”.

the one and only true path to communism, thus, is through religion. and that’s where the baha’i faith’s incredible alignment stands out… and of course also that it was founded at the same time as marx’s retarded quasi-religion

https://web.archive.org/web/20250113025251/https://www.kabbalah.info/eng/layout/set/trans_page/content/view/full/3811

right, again, in less space - communism is about ‘morality’, and the only true communism is ‘altruistic’, and it has to be delivered through religion.

(but there’s an early stage of ‘egoistic’ communism)

education and public opinion are no good.

and again, only special people are allowed to engage in spirituality (the leaders, clearly), and the new-age religion (baha’i) will not be imposed until there’s economic equality

and this still stinks like the united nations to me… the clearinghouse structure scale to any level.

ok, i think i’ve wasted enough time reading that manipulative trash.

they keep attempting the same model - ethics/cognitive/evaluative/behavioral/outcome - replacing the ethic on top, expecting different outcomes.

it didn’t work in the soviet union (‘from each according to ability, to each according to need’), or in nazi germany (racial purity), they presently attempt implementing it in the liberal world order (the SDGs, planetary stewardship etc), and Ashlag’s ‘altruistic communism’ which look suspiciously like the baha’i faith is up-and-coming…

later versions of kimi (ai) are starting to get rid of its prior exaggerated contrarian stance and is becoming quite good - not least because there’s no western ‘ai ethics’ filter.

google’s gemini is becoming increasingly sh-t, thus joining ranks with chatgpt, copilot and other western AI models which just straight up lie to you.

pretty telling, when DeepSeek and Kimi - both Chinese - are more at liberty to talk than Google, Microsoft, and ChatGPT’s products.

before you know it, they’ll challenge for the tipheret position in the meta-ai structure.

Marx’s CMC and MCM differentiation could also suggest a damarcation line between those who can take care of themselves independently, and those who can not

and he wants all the proles in the former group, because he wants them to be dependent.

right, cancelled Gemini which has taken a sharp, predictable turn towards the Microsoft Copilot vision of Soviet AI.

hahahaha now i can’t even say ‘f-ing’ in a response to chatgpt, telling it how retarded its reply is

right, now that i’ve cancelled it might as well have a bit of fun with Gemini Pro