the differentiation between ownership and control is interesting, because that’s exactly what takes place wrt tokenisation

and as for it making no difference - it’s not who owns the means of production. it’s about who manages the inputs and outputs of production.

it’s a soup of bureaucrats.

yeah, laitman’s wonderful ‘altruistic communism’ is just as oppressive as regular communism.

23) Ethics cannot rely solely on education and public opinion

oh wow, then we’re treated to a lenin quote - the permanent religious state does not stem from religion but from science

that’s… the final link, really.

Carus’s religion of science -> ethics

so IUCN claim something about ‘planetary stewardship’
ICSU (ISC) fabricates the ‘science’
this is channelled into religion as we can clearly see through ie Laudato Si and Laudate Deum
UNESCO brainwashes it with the kids
…
and then in 1993, we have Hans Kung’s ‘Towards a Global Ethic’ at the centenary of the first Parliament of thr World’s Religions, which is where Paul Carus, the great big monist that he was, introduced interfaith.

then we have miriam rothschild participating at both the 1942 Science and Ethics correspondence event, and the foundation of the IUCN.

science -> ethics

here

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/science-and-ethics?utm_source=publication-search

and science and ethics followed from the science and world order conference in 1941, which essentially contained all the british marxists who founded the various UN agencies

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/science-and-world-order?utm_source=publication-search

i mean, the alignment here is impeccable - and this is sourcing ashlag’s own material.

https://kabbalahmedia.info/en/sources/oIrPpKn2

in other news, thank you google and twitter for the 33 views yesterday. you’re really spoiling me, here.

omg, we’re even treated to “that wasn’t true communism”😂


the last generations will know why communism was revoked, that it was not because it could not be sustained, as capitalists say, but because the leaders did not understand how to establish that regime. They erected a regime of egoism where they should have established a regime of altruism

… and altruistic communism goes through egoistic communism… and communism must be international…

and the majority will always be anti-communists, meaning they have to rely on force.

what an awesome ideology, totally liberating for the ‘altruistic’ few

reading further, and it largely repeats itself continuously

so we’re down to two men in particular here - Paul Carus and Hermann Cohen

Carus bridged religion with science, Cohen supplies Kant’s categorical imperative which can be implemented incrementally

‘science’ leads to ‘ethical’ imperatives that must lead to the development of institutional authority

this psycho’s ‘altruistic communism’… it just gets better and better - unless you’re not ‘altruistic’, the it sounds like hell

so ‘altruistic communism’ = total control

‘They will be able to control their souls and lower the standard of living when needed’

not liberate - control.

it repeats itself continuously, but to reaffirm -

‘Ultimately, altruistic communism will encircle the entire world, and the entire world will have the same standard of living. However, the actual process is slow and gradual. Each nation whose majority of the public has been educated to bestowal upon one another will enter the international communist framework first.’

the actual process is slow and gradual

and, again - egoistic communism (dictatorship of the proletariat) precedes the final stage of ‘altruistic’ communism

you must hand over all property, and go through a reign of terror before you arrive at salvation - if you survive, that is