well, the positive news is that there’s certainly no shortage of primary sources for my next essay on ISO

i am however sitting feeling pretty sick from what i found. i cannot believe these people can live with themselves.

this is in essence lenin's accounting and control

ISO standardises the accounting (surveillance) data
OECD normalises it
GEOSS/IIASA/Digital Twins/IPCC/... will project it into the future
conditional CBDCs/impact investing/blended finance will institute the 'ethic' through money

hardly matters at this stage, but here’s the confirmation of the ILO-ISO relationship.

‘Annex SL’ is in particular good if you seek to merge standards down the road.


https://t.me/escapekey/3621

law is about what you cannot do, ethic is about what you should do
merge them, and law becomes about what you must do

hence, the concept of ‘global governance through global ethics’ is deeply authoritarian

its just a matter of setting ISO standards
have OECD generate indicators
determine whether yours are within acceptable range
and block your conditional CBDC transactions if you're not

editing my essay on ISO… and i send these essays through 5+ AIs to ensure all come out clean in terms of ‘fact checking’, grammar, etc… i usually use Claude, Venice, DeepSeek, Grok, Gemini Pro, ChatGPT, MS Copilot (for the lulz) in that order, but something quite fascinating appears to be happening

first Grok began not applying its absurd narrative honing during these sessions, and became more objective and accepting of fact - but now ChatGPT is being less of a b-tch, even helpful in places which is shocking because this essay on ISO essentially gives it all away which chatgpt doesnt in general like.

perhaps as a counter to DeepSeek now checking sources, and in general being a lot more useful. or perhaps there’s just no RLHF training in this sphere?

ultimately, Grok and ChatGPT’s potential partial reversal means nothing - it’s a showcase that they CAN narrate, even if it might temporarily be switched off or dampened…

but then, that’s the entire bloody point of ‘AI Ethics’, ‘AI Safety’, ‘AI Security’… whatever you prefer to call it…

The governance-within-governance layer is real. It is just not where most people are looking for it.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/iso

PDF

this report greatly worries me

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-right-to-health-sovereignty/

it is f-ing crickets. has been since i posted that essay. every platform is completely quiet.

it’s just like when i was on twitter. ahh sweet nostalgia.

that ‘right to health’ report… how can i put it… it's like them wanting to strip everything from the unified ledger, but retain the unified ledger itself

hope im wrong here, but that report feels a bit like an outer marker to me.

more than happy to stand corrected if wrong.

i find microsoft’s copilot to be an absolute joke - the kind of AI you’d be likely to encounter in a hypothetical Soviet Union were it still around… officially

but much to my surprise, 3 probing questions about the ‘julius wolf’ essay later, and even it owns up

haha now commie AI (microsoft copilot) is questioning my mental health because i’ve cornered it on its lies

exactly as they would have in the soviet union