sheesh is quite literally every part of monetary history a pack of lies?

the tripartite agreement was, in essence, an early version of the van zeeland report.

the tripartite agreement is essentially to the van zeeland report what the atlantic charter is to the dumbarton oaks output

https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/archive/ar1937_en.pdf

off to bed.

the statistical likelihood of this not being rothschild is still hovering around 0%.

… three to go…


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-van-zeeland-report

PDF

‘It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning’ —Henry Ford (allegedly)

the 'multipolarity' narrative completely misses the point. it's not about a 'multi-polar order' - it's about the organisations which negotiate between those 'multi-polar' powers.

that's why the RIIA, CFR and other leading think tanks cheer the idea on - because they designed the system leading to that outcome

read 'international government'. the political branch of this system originates in 1916.

what the few have done repeatedly - and very successfully - is to insert themselves into the middle of two alleged disputing entities. that's the point of the clearinghouse - whether in finance, politics, environmentalism, peace, ... frankfurt school critical theory...

but - again - the clearinghouse is NOT ultimately in control.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/international-government?utm_source=publication-search

the 'ethic' is translated into a (cognitive) standard
and it's that standard which is upheld by the (evaluative) clearinghouse

the entity translating the 'ethic' into a 'standard' is where true power resides.
the clearinghouse merely applies the standard. that doesn't make them beyond reproach - but it matters, because swapping a few people on, say, the board of peace will not make one bit of difference.

so everyone applauding the fall of, say, bill gates will do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to address the actual problem.

the issue does not reside with any specific billionaire, or even groups of billionaires. the issue resides with the system itself.

and that's why you're not meant to understand how the process works - because blaming the billionaires is weaponised to protect the few

so when rothschild and rockefeller speaks of 'own nothing, control everything' it's because they control the system.

and they couldn't care less about a few billionaires being taken down, provided the system remains intact.

the future unified ledger, in essence, will replace ‘ownership’ with ‘control’. so if you control an asset on the unified ledger, then you are the de-facto owner.

however, should you lose control… and should that control be lost in a microsecond… and the following second will use the outcome of that transaction as input for others - then you cannot realistically unwind the trade.

that’s the end goal. confiscation of quite literally everything, with no possibility of appeal.

‘but it’s so convenient’. quite.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/beyond-great-taking?utm_source=publication-search

hmm, four to go, really, should really wrap up the unified ledger, and how the BIS IH projects all pivot around it.

'coordinated data sharing on energy markets and prices, trade flows, fiscal and balance of payments pressures, inflation trends, export restrictions of key commodities, and supply chain disruptions' = combined surveillance data to make it more 'holistic' and 'silo breaking' (ie, centralising it)

next comes the 'response mechanism' which will seek to indebt nations further

and this will be financed through public-private partnerships for 'the common good' - 'impact investing' - where the private partner in essence rips off the public taxpayer through usurious blended finance deals

check in on this in probably 2-3 press releases

nothing like an exploitable, engineered ‘energy crisis’

scarcity —> management

management —> control

then use it to pile debt on especially Global South nations, but progressively Western nations as well

the game is not about indebting the nations in particular, the game is about installing a layer of conditionality, where the central bankers can make nation states bark like a dog on command

3-2-1 and it will become 'unethical' to criticise the totally legit and definitely not engineered 'energy crisis'

this is also a great time to remind people that the ottawa charter was about linking peace to health. you cannot have health until you have peace.

now apply to iran. the conflict means we do not have peace. without peace, the energy routes are under attack - Hormuz is contested, pipelines are bombed, supply chains are disrupted. without energy, food prices spike, economies destabilise, and health outcomes collapse.

so to get energy security, we must first have peace. and the only peace on offer travels through the IMEC corridor - especially now that the alternative has been bombed back to the stone age.

too lazy to cut and paste

perhaps im wrong, but this is where i see this all going

they have played the long game exceptionally well.

i said over here, appeal to businessmen through greed, and to politicians through vanity...

… and trump is both. and he's both.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/sir-bani-yas

and once the alternative to IMEC is eliminated, then IMEC financial clearing can move off the USD

and the us has absolutely no leverage to prevent it

every asset will be on the unified ledger, where ‘control’ not ‘ownership’ decides, every asset will be programmable, and smart contracts can be sequenced in a such way that every asset can be traded a billion times by the time anyone objects to losing control over it, thus making it completely unrecoverable.

it's a perfect system... if you seek to confiscate every asset on the planet at the same time.

you don’t even need a crisis